Whatever happened to eMunie?

[Coinsy]

Weren't they supposed to "change the game" in Crypto 2.0?

[1714724532]

1714724532

[1714724532]

1714724532

[1714724532]

1714724532

[1714724532]

1714724532

[1714724532]

1714724532

[1714724532]

1714724532

[dewdeded]

Subscribed.

[noelmal]

Just another oh my btc got stolen dev   with vapourware to con his small cult group.

[JustAnotherGuy]

I'm a beta tester for Emunie, and as we know there have been delays. But the developer (Dan) has been very active the past year and is chatting with us nearly every day (and even more with the founders).

This will be released.

[Fuserleer]

I didn't realize the game was over?  Who changed it so it was?   

[00Smurf]

I'm a beta tester for Emunie, and as we know there have been delays. But the developer (Dan) has been very active the past year and is chatting with us nearly every day (and even more with the founders).

This will be released.

another "dan" dev, why are the majority of coin devs named "dan"?

[Zer0Sum]

I didn't realize the game was over?  Who changed it so it was?   

There is nothing to indicate you can make it work...
You have completely misjudged other successful Gen 2.0 platforms for 18 months...
And fallen way behind by applying a glacial, corporate development approach to a fast moving sector.

And it's not even about currency anymore...
It's about businesses building and delivering REVENUES on your platform.

So, yes, the game you seem to be playing is over.

[skywave]

I didn't realize the game was over?  Who changed it so it was?  

There is nothing to indicate you can make it work...
You have completely misjudged other successful Gen 2.0 platforms for 18 months...
And fallen way behind by applying a glacial, corporate development approach to a fast moving sector.

And it's not even about currency anymore...
It's about businesses building and delivering REVENUES on your platform.

So, yes, the game you seem to be playing is over.

Dear Zer0Sum,
May I suggest to you this?:
Make a print - in big font - of your post.
Put it in a nice frame.
Hang it over your bed.
Then - every night when you go to bed - look at it and say out loud:
Never again shall I speak nonsense about something I don't know anything about!

[Sparky_eMunie]

I didn't realize the game was over?  Who changed it so it was?  

There is nothing to indicate you can make it work...
You have completely misjudged other successful Gen 2.0 platforms for 18 months...
And fallen way behind by applying a glacial, corporate development approach to a fast moving sector.

And it's not even about currency anymore...
It's about businesses building and delivering REVENUES on your platform.

So, yes, the game you seem to be playing is over.

There is currently no digital currency available that can even compare to the eMunie Beta from 2013. I would even say there is no digital currency period. All we have are digital assets certificates comparable to gold or oil certificates. The first digital currency out will be the new standard. And since there is nothing else comparable to eMunie even in development, I think eMunie will be the first digital currency out. Even after all these (necessary) delays.

Any tech based on a blockchain is bound to fail. It's slow, ineffective, error prone, and hard to use.

[Fuserleer]

I didn't realize the game was over?  Who changed it so it was?   

There is nothing to indicate you can make it work...
You have completely misjudged other successful Gen 2.0 platforms for 18 months...
And fallen way behind by applying a glacial, corporate development approach to a fast moving sector.

And it's not even about currency anymore...
It's about businesses building and delivering REVENUES on your platform.

So, yes, the game you seem to be playing is over.

Nothing to indicate...ok, I guess the client must be a figment of my imagination.

And are you kidding me??  Successful Gen 2.0 platforms? What? Unless Bitcoin is suddenly regarded as 2.0 I don't see any success, the roost is still ruled by 1.0 tech, Bitcoin, Ripple, LTC and others.  All the "2.0" platforms are behind.  I don't even consider Bitcoin a success anymore, 2-3 million users after 5 years would be a failure in any other industry sector.

And it's not even about currency anymore...
It's about businesses building and delivering REVENUES on your platform.

THIS is why nothing is more successful than Bitcoin, everyone is running around being a bunch of fat greedy assholes only concerned about making money, instead of actually concentrating on what matters.

I don't get the stigma surrounding what we are trying to do, and you know what, I don't even care about it anymore...play in your sandpit, there is a whole world out there no one here seems to care about.

[dewdeded]

If you guys claim eMunie is still alive, why not give a concrete release date and serious & believable (project) roadmap?

[Fuserleer]

Why is not doing that bad?  Why is working on this tech without the pressure of a release date a bad thing?

I'm in no rush, it's ready when it's ready and I'll make those announcements when I feel the vision is complete, the tech is ready, we are happy with it, and the dates are achievable.

We have developed tech that no ones even close to having, and that takes time, so it's worth doing right, because from where I'm sitting no one else has other that Satoshi.  And the "competition", it's small fry in the grand scheme of things.

[Sparky_eMunie]

Because it's not possible. It's like with the moon landing. Development of any ground breaking technology has many development issues. The client works fine since many months with the blockchainless protocol on a simulated Bitcoin scale transaction volume. But we don't want to replace Bitcoin, we want to replace Paypal, Mastercard and Visa. It's not trivial.

[choochimil]

I forgot about emunie, but I was very interested in it about a year ago. If it comes out I will keep an eye on it for sure.

[kjadB]

I thought CfB came out and admitted he was Fuserleer last year.

[lovely89]

I thought CfB came out and admitted he was Fuserleer last year.

Lol. Cfb is Fuserleer? Wouldn't that be a twsit and a half!

[Videlicet]

Why is not doing that bad?  Why is working on this tech without the pressure of a release date a bad thing?

I'm in no rush, it's ready when it's ready and I'll make those announcements when I feel the vision is complete, the tech is ready, we are happy with it, and the dates are achievable.

We have developed tech that no ones even close to having, and that takes time, so it's worth doing right, because from where I'm sitting no one else has other that Satoshi.  And the "competition", it's small fry in the grand scheme of things.

You say you sit equal to Satoshi, but yet his implementation and work to develop the blockchain is what your work is based on whether you use the same code or not, for you did not make eMunie before Satoshi's Bitcoin; we must regard the source of our growth before claiming fame from another.

Keep in mind NXT, Ripple, Steller, etc. all have unique code bases written from scratch, with each claiming their "innovation" is superior. Look at Apple and Microsoft, Apple clearly had the better Technology, but Gates played the game better. Sadly, this is the condition of earth  

Thank You,
Viz.

P.S. That anonymous option will bite you in the ass when you try to establish regulation, which is necessary if you are wanting to replace the existing financial systems with your "Electronic Money Units". May I suggest an alternative of "Electronic Monetary Units" as that to me seems more proper, but of course just my opinion 

Also curious, your claim "Highest levels of security that technology can provide".
What's your minimum bit length for your keys and cryptography?

[kennyP]

I thought CfB came out and admitted he was Fuserleer last year.

no, Fuserleer admitted that 'CfB' was one of his sockpuppets

[Sparky_eMunie]

You say you sit equal to Satoshi, but yet his implementation and work to develop the blockchain is what your work is based on whether you use the same code or not, for you did not make eMunie before Satoshi's Bitcoin; we must regard the source of our growth before claiming fame from another.

eMunie is not based on a blockchain.

[Daedelus]

I thought CfB came out and admitted he was Fuserleer last year.

no, Fuserleer admitted that 'CfB' was one of his sockpuppets

I admit Gmaxwell, cunicula and satoshi are my sockpuppets.

[Come-from-Beyond]

Any tech based on a blockchain is bound to fail. It's slow, ineffective, error prone, and hard to use.

Glad to hear that I'm not the only one who sees this obvious thing.

[Fuserleer]

Why is not doing that bad?  Why is working on this tech without the pressure of a release date a bad thing?

I'm in no rush, it's ready when it's ready and I'll make those announcements when I feel the vision is complete, the tech is ready, we are happy with it, and the dates are achievable.

We have developed tech that no ones even close to having, and that takes time, so it's worth doing right, because from where I'm sitting no one else has other that Satoshi.  And the "competition", it's small fry in the grand scheme of things.

You say you sit equal to Satoshi, but yet his implementation and work to develop the blockchain is what your work is based on whether you use the same code or not, for you did not make eMunie before Satoshi's Bitcoin; we must regard the source of our growth before claiming fame from another.

Keep in mind NXT, Ripple, Steller, etc. all have unique code bases written from scratch, with each claiming their "innovation" is superior. Look at Apple and Microsoft, Apple clearly had the better Technology, but Gates played the game better. Sadly, this is the condition of earth  

Thank You,
Viz.

P.S. That anonymous option will bite you in the ass when you try to establish regulation, which is necessary if you are wanting to replace the existing financial systems with your "Electronic Money Units". May I suggest an alternative of "Electronic Monetary Units" as that to me seems more proper, but of course just my opinion 

Also curious, your claim "Highest levels of security that technology can provide".
What's your minimum bit length for your keys and cryptography?

eMunie was never based on blockchain technology...ever, because it doesn't scale, it's wasteful and inefficient. 

eMunie is the ONLY tech that doesn't use a blockchain, everyone else took something that Satoshi did and modified, we haven't, and that's why its taken some time.

The anonymity is optional, if it puts a brick wall in our path down the road then it can be disabled, everything is modular and can be plugged in and out without effect to the rest of the system.

Minimum required key length for signatures is 160bit, minimum for encryption is 256bit....and supports up to 512bit for each, so covered as hardware gets faster.

[Come-from-Beyond]

eMunie is the ONLY tech that doesn't use a blockchain, everyone else took something that Satoshi did and modified, we haven't, and that's why its taken some time.

Ripple doesn't use blockchain but it proves your point in the second part. Ripple development started earlier than Bitcoin.

[TinEye]

eMunie was never based on blockchain technology...ever, because it doesn't scale, it's wasteful and inefficient. 

eMunie is the ONLY tech that doesn't use a blockchain, everyone else took something that Satoshi did and modified, we haven't, and that's why its taken some time.

Better to be wasteful and inefficient rather than vaporware.

[Fuserleer]

eMunie is the ONLY tech that doesn't use a blockchain, everyone else took something that Satoshi did and modified, we haven't, and that's why its taken some time.

Ripple doesn't use blockchain but it proves your point in the second part. Ripple development started earlier than Bitcoin.

Ahh my bad! Yes, and Ripple...

eMunie was never based on blockchain technology...ever, because it doesn't scale, it's wasteful and inefficient. 

eMunie is the ONLY tech that doesn't use a blockchain, everyone else took something that Satoshi did and modified, we haven't, and that's why its taken some time.

Better to be wasteful and inefficient rather than vaporware.

*YAWN*

[TinEye]

eMunie was never based on blockchain technology...ever, because it doesn't scale, it's wasteful and inefficient. 

eMunie is the ONLY tech that doesn't use a blockchain, everyone else took something that Satoshi did and modified, we haven't, and that's why its taken some time.

Better to be wasteful and inefficient rather than vaporware.

*YAWN*

Thats right, keep napping while everyone else move ahead.

[Fuserleer]

eMunie was never based on blockchain technology...ever, because it doesn't scale, it's wasteful and inefficient. 

eMunie is the ONLY tech that doesn't use a blockchain, everyone else took something that Satoshi did and modified, we haven't, and that's why its taken some time.

Better to be wasteful and inefficient rather than vaporware.

*YAWN*

Thats right, keep napping while everyone else move ahead.

Lol!!  Nothings moved ahead in 6 years since BTC came out...

[Peachy]

eMunie was never based on blockchain technology...ever, because it doesn't scale, it's wasteful and inefficient. 

eMunie is the ONLY tech that doesn't use a blockchain, everyone else took something that Satoshi did and modified, we haven't, and that's why its taken some time.

Better to be wasteful and inefficient rather than vaporware.

Vaporware?
I guess we should all be driving around on horse and buggies since the development of a more efficient mode of transportation would be considered vaporware.

I can personally vouch that it is indeed NOT vaporware as I've test driven it several times.  Trust me when I say it's in a category beyond anything you've ever encountered.

[TinEye]

Lol!!  Nothings moved ahead in 6 years since BTC came out...

Wow

If it makes you happy.

I can personally vouch that it is indeed NOT vaporware as I've test driven it several times.  Trust me when I say it's in a category beyond anything you've ever encountered.

No reason to, but if it indeed is what it keeps on claiming then it would be excellent. I seriously doubt it is going to.

[noelmal]

eMunie was never based on blockchain technology...ever, because it doesn't scale, it's wasteful and inefficient. 

eMunie is the ONLY tech that doesn't use a blockchain, everyone else took something that Satoshi did and modified, we haven't, and that's why its taken some time.

Better to be wasteful and inefficient rather than vaporware.

Trust me when I say it's in a category beyond anything you've ever encountered.

Granted few scams play out this long, I'll give it that 

[Peachy]

Lol!!  Nothings moved ahead in 6 years since BTC came out...

Wow

If it makes you happy.

I can personally vouch that it is indeed NOT vaporware as I've test driven it several times.  Trust me when I say it's in a category beyond anything you've ever encountered.

No reason to, but if it indeed is what it keeps on claiming then it would be excellent. I seriously doubt it is going to.

I get where you are coming from and the need for a cautiously pessimistic outlook.

With all of the "supposed" revolutionary coins (a.k.a. copy-clone coins) that have sprouted up like weeds with their ever-sickening pump-n-dump strategies it is easy to be wary and rightfully suspicious of anything purporting to be new and revolutionary.   Thus, all I'm asking (which is a large ask given the landscape of the past few years) is that you maintain an openness towards the idea that there might be a better way.

[Fuserleer]

Every time I step in here....  

It's like the local drinking establishment where everyone in there doesn't have a job because they can't be arsed to get off their backsides and do anything.  The one guy that drinks there that does have a job, because he got up and did something different to everyone else, is hated on, made fun of and gets ridiculed because of it.

Enjoy your pints all...

[Fuserleer]

Lol!!  Nothings moved ahead in 6 years since BTC came out...

Wow

If it makes you happy.

I can personally vouch that it is indeed NOT vaporware as I've test driven it several times.  Trust me when I say it's in a category beyond anything you've ever encountered.

No reason to, but if it indeed is what it keeps on claiming then it would be excellent. I seriously doubt it is going to.

I get where you are coming from and the need for a cautiously pessimistic outlook.

With all of the "supposed" revolutionary coins (a.k.a. copy-clone coins) that have sprouted up like weeds with their ever-sickening pump-n-dump strategies it is easy to be wary and rightfully suspicious of anything purporting to be new and revolutionary.   Thus, all I'm asking (which is a large ask given the landscape of the past few years) is that you maintain an openness towards the idea that there might be a better way.

There's being wary and cautious, and then there's being downright rude and nasty.

[Peachy]

eMunie was never based on blockchain technology...ever, because it doesn't scale, it's wasteful and inefficient. 

eMunie is the ONLY tech that doesn't use a blockchain, everyone else took something that Satoshi did and modified, we haven't, and that's why its taken some time.

Better to be wasteful and inefficient rather than vaporware.

Trust me when I say it's in a category beyond anything you've ever encountered.

Granted few scams play out this long, I'll give it that 

There's the hopeful optimism that was the original intent behind the entire crypto scene.  

It is indeed not a scam as he previously refunded over half a million dollars at his own personal expense to those that wanted out due to the delays of the project or because they needed the money for other uses.  Find me any other dev that has such unquestionable integrity.  I'm guessing it'll be a while because I've yet to encounter one.

[Uest3]

If some people think Emunie is a scam or a fictive coin is their problem, I'm a beta tester, I have tested the client many times. Besides all great features, the succes isn't guaranteed yet, our community should not answer to these attacks untill the client is ready for mass adoption. Just my opinion.

[noelmal]

eMunie was never based on blockchain technology...ever, because it doesn't scale, it's wasteful and inefficient.  

eMunie is the ONLY tech that doesn't use a blockchain, everyone else took something that Satoshi did and modified, we haven't, and that's why its taken some time.

Better to be wasteful and inefficient rather than vaporware.

Trust me when I say it's in a category beyond anything you've ever encountered.

Granted few scams play out this long, I'll give it that  

There's the hopeful optimism that was the original intent behind the entire crypto scene.  

It is indeed not a scam as he previously refunded over half a million dollars at his own personal expense to those that wanted out due to the delays of the project or because they needed the money for other uses.  Find me any other dev that has such unquestionable integrity.  I'm guessing it'll be a while because I've yet to encounter one.

Easy to refund when you stole your own coins, ie he still had their coins/money to giveback to them ffs how thick are you people.

His integrity OMFG, he scammed his gov, he stole his own coins to hide the money he collected ffs its been done 1 thousand and 1 times in this community.

[Peachy]

eMunie was never based on blockchain technology...ever, because it doesn't scale, it's wasteful and inefficient.  

eMunie is the ONLY tech that doesn't use a blockchain, everyone else took something that Satoshi did and modified, we haven't, and that's why its taken some time.

Better to be wasteful and inefficient rather than vaporware.

Trust me when I say it's in a category beyond anything you've ever encountered.

Granted few scams play out this long, I'll give it that  

There's the hopeful optimism that was the original intent behind the entire crypto scene.  

It is indeed not a scam as he previously refunded over half a million dollars at his own personal expense to those that wanted out due to the delays of the project or because they needed the money for other uses.  Find me any other dev that has such unquestionable integrity.  I'm guessing it'll be a while because I've yet to encounter one.

Easy to refund when you stole your own coins, ie he still had their coins/money to giveback to them ffs how thick are you people.

His integrity OMFG, he scammed his gov, he stole his own coins to hide the money he collected ffs its been done 1 thousand and 1 times in this community.

Wow.  Just Wow.

I don't even know where to begin with this level of insanity and paranoia.  I apologize if you were personally affected by some other tragedy, but you should rethink painting everything with the same broad brush of guilt.  Sometimes theft is truly theft without the conspiracy you might imagine. 

I personally challenge you to find one shred of proof to backup your allegations or else this accusation is truly off the rails.  I can easily identify several individuals that can back up my claims of his integrity.  Likewise, I have met him in person and would vouch for his moral compass pointing unwaveringly North.

Sorry for your loss.

[Fuserleer]

I was gunna leave a nice reply, but it's like talking to a brick wall

People can believe what they want to believe, fact is the BTC got stolen, I paid the price for it.  Sometimes there are no conspiracies, or a grand plan to deceive, what is said happened, happened.

Unless the guy that stole them dares to come forward and announce it, and proves he did, you'll have to make up your own mind, because it's impossible to prove you don't own something.

[noelmal]

eMunie was never based on blockchain technology...ever, because it doesn't scale, it's wasteful and inefficient.  

eMunie is the ONLY tech that doesn't use a blockchain, everyone else took something that Satoshi did and modified, we haven't, and that's why its taken some time.

Better to be wasteful and inefficient rather than vaporware.

Trust me when I say it's in a category beyond anything you've ever encountered.

Granted few scams play out this long, I'll give it that  

There's the hopeful optimism that was the original intent behind the entire crypto scene.  

It is indeed not a scam as he previously refunded over half a million dollars at his own personal expense to those that wanted out due to the delays of the project or because they needed the money for other uses.  Find me any other dev that has such unquestionable integrity.  I'm guessing it'll be a while because I've yet to encounter one.

Easy to refund when you stole your own coins, ie he still had their coins/money to giveback to them ffs how thick are you people.

His integrity OMFG, he scammed his gov, he stole his own coins to hide the money he collected ffs its been done 1 thousand and 1 times in this community.

Wow.  Just Wow.

I don't even know where to begin with this level of insanity and paranoia.  I apologize if you were personally affected by some other tragedy, but you should rethink painting everything with the same broad brush of guilt.  Sometimes theft is truly theft without the conspiracy you might imagine.  

I personally challenge you to find one shred of proof to backup your allegations or else this accusation is truly off the rails.  I can easily identify several individuals that can back up my claims of his integrity.  Likewise, I have met him in person and would vouch for his moral compass pointing unwaveringly North.

Sorry for your loss.

Peachy your level of twisted nuttiness isnt even worth further response to.

[noelmal]

I was gunna leave a nice reply, but it's like talking to a brick wall

Oh I read the dribble before you deleted it.

[Peachy]

eMunie was never based on blockchain technology...ever, because it doesn't scale, it's wasteful and inefficient.  

eMunie is the ONLY tech that doesn't use a blockchain, everyone else took something that Satoshi did and modified, we haven't, and that's why its taken some time.

Better to be wasteful and inefficient rather than vaporware.

Trust me when I say it's in a category beyond anything you've ever encountered.

Granted few scams play out this long, I'll give it that  

There's the hopeful optimism that was the original intent behind the entire crypto scene.  

It is indeed not a scam as he previously refunded over half a million dollars at his own personal expense to those that wanted out due to the delays of the project or because they needed the money for other uses.  Find me any other dev that has such unquestionable integrity.  I'm guessing it'll be a while because I've yet to encounter one.

Easy to refund when you stole your own coins, ie he still had their coins/money to giveback to them ffs how thick are you people.

His integrity OMFG, he scammed his gov, he stole his own coins to hide the money he collected ffs its been done 1 thousand and 1 times in this community.

Wow.  Just Wow.

I don't even know where to begin with this level of insanity and paranoia.  I apologize if you were personally affected by some other tragedy, but you should rethink painting everything with the same broad brush of guilt.  Sometimes theft is truly theft without the conspiracy you might imagine. 

I personally challenge you to find one shred of proof to backup your allegations or else this accusation is truly off the rails.  I can easily identify several individuals that can back up my claims of his integrity.  Likewise, I have met him in person and would vouch for his moral compass pointing unwaveringly North.

Sorry for your loss.

Peachy your level of twisted nuttiness is even worth further response to.

Ok.  Sorry you feel that way as I was hoping to assuage any concerns you were having.
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on the facts.

[Hansen]

I was gunna leave a nice reply, but it's like talking to a brick wall

Oh I read the dribble before you deleted it.

[Videlicet]

Why is not doing that bad?  Why is working on this tech without the pressure of a release date a bad thing?

I'm in no rush, it's ready when it's ready and I'll make those announcements when I feel the vision is complete, the tech is ready, we are happy with it, and the dates are achievable.

We have developed tech that no ones even close to having, and that takes time, so it's worth doing right, because from where I'm sitting no one else has other that Satoshi.  And the "competition", it's small fry in the grand scheme of things.

You say you sit equal to Satoshi, but yet his implementation and work to develop the blockchain is what your work is based on whether you use the same code or not, for you did not make eMunie before Satoshi's Bitcoin; we must regard the source of our growth before claiming fame from another.

Keep in mind NXT, Ripple, Steller, etc. all have unique code bases written from scratch, with each claiming their "innovation" is superior. Look at Apple and Microsoft, Apple clearly had the better Technology, but Gates played the game better. Sadly, this is the condition of earth  

Thank You,
Viz.

P.S. That anonymous option will bite you in the ass when you try to establish regulation, which is necessary if you are wanting to replace the existing financial systems with your "Electronic Money Units". May I suggest an alternative of "Electronic Monetary Units" as that to me seems more proper, but of course just my opinion 

Also curious, your claim "Highest levels of security that technology can provide".
What's your minimum bit length for your keys and cryptography?

eMunie was never based on blockchain technology...ever, because it doesn't scale, it's wasteful and inefficient. 

eMunie is the ONLY tech that doesn't use a blockchain, everyone else took something that Satoshi did and modified, we haven't, and that's why its taken some time.

The anonymity is optional, if it puts a brick wall in our path down the road then it can be disabled, everything is modular and can be plugged in and out without effect to the rest of the system.

Minimum required key length for signatures is 160bit, minimum for encryption is 256bit....and supports up to 512bit for each, so covered as hardware gets faster.

What I'm getting at, is without Satoshi, nor his success with Bitcoin, you wouldn't have made eMunie, can't disregard blockchain when you inherit the principals of decentralization from Satoshi, among others. Many coins have already written from scratch, yet none have surpassed Bitcoin as of yet.

So 512 is your maximum cryptographic output, this isn't highest security possible FYI. Might want to reword your website to be accurate, otherwise it looks like most other coins, even if you did write it from scratch. 

Thank You,
Viz.

[dewdeded]

Is eMunie going to be decentralised? How is the ledger and consensus algorithm working, if it has no blockchain?

[Peachy]

Is eMunie going to be decentralised? How is the ledger and consensus algorithm working, if it has no blockchain?

Completely decentralized.

As for the ledger and consensus, I'll let the whitepaper provide those answers. We're wrapping that up shortly and it's nearly ready for publication.

[Sparky_eMunie]

What I'm getting at, is without Satoshi, nor his success with Bitcoin, you wouldn't have made eMunie, can't disregard blockchain when you inherit the principals of decentralization from Satoshi, among others. Many coins have already written from scratch, yet none have surpassed Bitcoin as of yet.

Why can't you disregard the blockchain? It's like claiming that riding a horse is the last step in transportation, and everything that comes after has to have four legs.  

[Videlicet]

If it were a horse, rather than a synchronized machine you would have a point - but in the realm of machines, it is expanded in the supplementing components of the engine, yes the rotary is quicker revving, higher RPM capable, but still not as solid as a V8, which always gets you there. The blockchain is the engine, and you're pushing the Rotary saying you invented the engine.

Satoshi invented the engine, at least pay him some respect.

Thank You,
Viz.

[Sparky_eMunie]

BTC blockchain is the horse, a slow one, maybe a donkey.

[r3wt]

BTC blockchain is the horse, a slow one, maybe a donkey.

more like a pig, moving only a few feet at a time in a pile of its own feces, eating a handful of transactions, shitting out 25 coins and a block, then sleeping for 10 minutes

[kelsey]

yeah you see alot on this forum and around the bitcoin nerd community about blockchain technology, but as i've often said it makes it seem like much of blockchain tech is a solution looking for a problem.

[kennyP]

yeah you see alot on this forum and around the bitcoin nerd community about blockchain technology, but as i've often said it makes it seem like much of blockchain tech is a solution looking for a problem.

prodigal son ....

[cryptopaths]

If it were a horse, rather than a synchronized machine you would have a point - but in the realm of machines, it is expanded in the supplementing components of the engine, yes the rotary is quicker revving, higher RPM capable, but still not as solid as a V8, which always gets you there. The blockchain is the engine, and you're pushing the Rotary saying you invented the engine.

Satoshi invented the engine, at least pay him some respect.

Thank You,
Viz.

You do realize Satoshi didn't invent the blockchain right? The idea of the blockchain had been around for a very long time Satoshi just solved problems like double spends, reversing transactions etc. While Satoshi vastly reduced the possibility of these things happening they are still possible in Bitcoin to some extent. The Bitcoin code is an amazing creation but it would be a lie to say that nothing could be better.

[jubalix]

I invested in emunie way way back....and Dan has be ok so far as I can tell.

You have to cast the investment strategy wide I say. So one dev doesn't want pressure on his Dev. That Ok rather than headless chicken running around and then bug stop for ever and a day.

[Videlicet]

The Bitcoin code is an amazing creation but it would be a lie to say that nothing could be better.

Well of course a binary tree is quite a well known computing structure, but the fact of designing the secure data object with pow to allow it to be in a decentralized environment among others is pure brilliance: this does not mean it can't be improved - but to shame Satoshi's work with ignorant comparisons, I have a problem with.

We can't forget our roots,
Viz.