Whatever happened to eMunie?

[Peachy]

eMunie was never based on blockchain technology...ever, because it doesn't scale, it's wasteful and inefficient.  

eMunie is the ONLY tech that doesn't use a blockchain, everyone else took something that Satoshi did and modified, we haven't, and that's why its taken some time.

Better to be wasteful and inefficient rather than vaporware.

Trust me when I say it's in a category beyond anything you've ever encountered.

Granted few scams play out this long, I'll give it that  

There's the hopeful optimism that was the original intent behind the entire crypto scene.  

It is indeed not a scam as he previously refunded over half a million dollars at his own personal expense to those that wanted out due to the delays of the project or because they needed the money for other uses.  Find me any other dev that has such unquestionable integrity.  I'm guessing it'll be a while because I've yet to encounter one.

Easy to refund when you stole your own coins, ie he still had their coins/money to giveback to them ffs how thick are you people.

His integrity OMFG, he scammed his gov, he stole his own coins to hide the money he collected ffs its been done 1 thousand and 1 times in this community.

Wow.  Just Wow.

I don't even know where to begin with this level of insanity and paranoia.  I apologize if you were personally affected by some other tragedy, but you should rethink painting everything with the same broad brush of guilt.  Sometimes theft is truly theft without the conspiracy you might imagine. 

I personally challenge you to find one shred of proof to backup your allegations or else this accusation is truly off the rails.  I can easily identify several individuals that can back up my claims of his integrity.  Likewise, I have met him in person and would vouch for his moral compass pointing unwaveringly North.

Sorry for your loss.

Peachy your level of twisted nuttiness is even worth further response to.

Ok.  Sorry you feel that way as I was hoping to assuage any concerns you were having.
I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on the facts.

[Hansen]

I was gunna leave a nice reply, but it's like talking to a brick wall

Oh I read the dribble before you deleted it.

[Videlicet]

Why is not doing that bad?  Why is working on this tech without the pressure of a release date a bad thing?

I'm in no rush, it's ready when it's ready and I'll make those announcements when I feel the vision is complete, the tech is ready, we are happy with it, and the dates are achievable.

We have developed tech that no ones even close to having, and that takes time, so it's worth doing right, because from where I'm sitting no one else has other that Satoshi.  And the "competition", it's small fry in the grand scheme of things.

You say you sit equal to Satoshi, but yet his implementation and work to develop the blockchain is what your work is based on whether you use the same code or not, for you did not make eMunie before Satoshi's Bitcoin; we must regard the source of our growth before claiming fame from another.

Keep in mind NXT, Ripple, Steller, etc. all have unique code bases written from scratch, with each claiming their "innovation" is superior. Look at Apple and Microsoft, Apple clearly had the better Technology, but Gates played the game better. Sadly, this is the condition of earth  

Thank You,
Viz.

P.S. That anonymous option will bite you in the ass when you try to establish regulation, which is necessary if you are wanting to replace the existing financial systems with your "Electronic Money Units". May I suggest an alternative of "Electronic Monetary Units" as that to me seems more proper, but of course just my opinion 

Also curious, your claim "Highest levels of security that technology can provide".
What's your minimum bit length for your keys and cryptography?

eMunie was never based on blockchain technology...ever, because it doesn't scale, it's wasteful and inefficient. 

eMunie is the ONLY tech that doesn't use a blockchain, everyone else took something that Satoshi did and modified, we haven't, and that's why its taken some time.

The anonymity is optional, if it puts a brick wall in our path down the road then it can be disabled, everything is modular and can be plugged in and out without effect to the rest of the system.

Minimum required key length for signatures is 160bit, minimum for encryption is 256bit....and supports up to 512bit for each, so covered as hardware gets faster.

What I'm getting at, is without Satoshi, nor his success with Bitcoin, you wouldn't have made eMunie, can't disregard blockchain when you inherit the principals of decentralization from Satoshi, among others. Many coins have already written from scratch, yet none have surpassed Bitcoin as of yet.

So 512 is your maximum cryptographic output, this isn't highest security possible FYI. Might want to reword your website to be accurate, otherwise it looks like most other coins, even if you did write it from scratch. 

Thank You,
Viz.

[dewdeded]

Is eMunie going to be decentralised? How is the ledger and consensus algorithm working, if it has no blockchain?

[Peachy]

Is eMunie going to be decentralised? How is the ledger and consensus algorithm working, if it has no blockchain?

Completely decentralized.

As for the ledger and consensus, I'll let the whitepaper provide those answers. We're wrapping that up shortly and it's nearly ready for publication.

[Sparky_eMunie]

What I'm getting at, is without Satoshi, nor his success with Bitcoin, you wouldn't have made eMunie, can't disregard blockchain when you inherit the principals of decentralization from Satoshi, among others. Many coins have already written from scratch, yet none have surpassed Bitcoin as of yet.

Why can't you disregard the blockchain? It's like claiming that riding a horse is the last step in transportation, and everything that comes after has to have four legs.  

[Videlicet]

If it were a horse, rather than a synchronized machine you would have a point - but in the realm of machines, it is expanded in the supplementing components of the engine, yes the rotary is quicker revving, higher RPM capable, but still not as solid as a V8, which always gets you there. The blockchain is the engine, and you're pushing the Rotary saying you invented the engine.

Satoshi invented the engine, at least pay him some respect.

Thank You,
Viz.

[Sparky_eMunie]

BTC blockchain is the horse, a slow one, maybe a donkey.

[r3wt]

BTC blockchain is the horse, a slow one, maybe a donkey.

more like a pig, moving only a few feet at a time in a pile of its own feces, eating a handful of transactions, shitting out 25 coins and a block, then sleeping for 10 minutes

[kelsey]

yeah you see alot on this forum and around the bitcoin nerd community about blockchain technology, but as i've often said it makes it seem like much of blockchain tech is a solution looking for a problem.

[kennyP]

yeah you see alot on this forum and around the bitcoin nerd community about blockchain technology, but as i've often said it makes it seem like much of blockchain tech is a solution looking for a problem.

prodigal son ....

[cryptopaths]

If it were a horse, rather than a synchronized machine you would have a point - but in the realm of machines, it is expanded in the supplementing components of the engine, yes the rotary is quicker revving, higher RPM capable, but still not as solid as a V8, which always gets you there. The blockchain is the engine, and you're pushing the Rotary saying you invented the engine.

Satoshi invented the engine, at least pay him some respect.

Thank You,
Viz.

You do realize Satoshi didn't invent the blockchain right? The idea of the blockchain had been around for a very long time Satoshi just solved problems like double spends, reversing transactions etc. While Satoshi vastly reduced the possibility of these things happening they are still possible in Bitcoin to some extent. The Bitcoin code is an amazing creation but it would be a lie to say that nothing could be better.

[jubalix]

I invested in emunie way way back....and Dan has be ok so far as I can tell.

You have to cast the investment strategy wide I say. So one dev doesn't want pressure on his Dev. That Ok rather than headless chicken running around and then bug stop for ever and a day.

[Videlicet]

The Bitcoin code is an amazing creation but it would be a lie to say that nothing could be better.

Well of course a binary tree is quite a well known computing structure, but the fact of designing the secure data object with pow to allow it to be in a decentralized environment among others is pure brilliance: this does not mean it can't be improved - but to shame Satoshi's work with ignorant comparisons, I have a problem with.

We can't forget our roots,
Viz.