Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 05:33:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Encrypted Jabber Communication  (Read 4433 times)
BitterTea (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 27, 2011, 06:52:59 AM
Last edit: May 27, 2011, 08:15:55 PM by BitterTea
 #1

After a discussion with a friend, I wanted to find an encrypted chat solution. I came across Psi, an open source Jabber client that supports OpenPGP encryption.

I have to say, I love it. The user interface is very minimal, I find it much more pleasing than Pidgin. It's easy to set up but there appear to be lots of advanced settings. It was trivial to get it running over Tor with polipo, and OpenPGP integration is very nice.

You can use the UI to register a new account on any Jabber server, or use an existing account. Here's how to set it up for Google chat.

Mods: if there's a more appropriate place for this, please move it. I didn't think it fit in technical support or bitcoin discussion. (lol, I meant to put it in Other > Off-topic, not Local > Other)
1714844021
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714844021

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714844021
Reply with quote  #2

1714844021
Report to moderator
1714844021
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714844021

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714844021
Reply with quote  #2

1714844021
Report to moderator
1714844021
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714844021

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714844021
Reply with quote  #2

1714844021
Report to moderator
Unlike traditional banking where clients have only a few account numbers, with Bitcoin people can create an unlimited number of accounts (addresses). This can be used to easily track payments, and it improves anonymity.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714844021
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714844021

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714844021
Reply with quote  #2

1714844021
Report to moderator
1714844021
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714844021

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714844021
Reply with quote  #2

1714844021
Report to moderator
1714844021
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714844021

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714844021
Reply with quote  #2

1714844021
Report to moderator
bittrader
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 1



View Profile
May 28, 2011, 02:18:54 PM
 #2

Am I understanding correctly that this supports encryption from one client to the other, without the server being able to decrypt? That would be really cool.
BitterTea (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 28, 2011, 03:03:42 PM
 #3

Am I understanding correctly that this supports encryption from one client to the other, without the server being able to decrypt? That would be really cool.

Yes, it supports the use of GPG for end to end encryption. If have each other's private key you can talk over google chat without google being able to see what you're saying. It is very nice!
bleedkira
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83
Merit: 10



View Profile
June 01, 2011, 02:01:55 AM
 #4

You mean you have eachother's public key. I use Pidgin+OTR for my encrypted chats.
JackSparrow
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 116
Merit: 10



View Profile
June 05, 2011, 11:16:43 PM
 #5

OTR is much better than PGP/GPG when using via IM, because you got two extra features: Deniability and forward secrecy.

From http://www.cypherpunks.ca/otr/
Quote
Deniability
    The messages you send do not have digital signatures that are checkable by a third party. Anyone can forge messages after a conversation to make them look like they came from you. However, during a conversation, your correspondent is assured the messages he sees are authentic and unmodified.

Perfect forward secrecy
    If you lose control of your private keys, no previous conversation is compromised.
Binford 6100
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


PGP OTC WOT: EB7FCE3D


View Profile
June 21, 2011, 05:01:26 PM
 #6

heard about silc? it's around for a few years ...

You can't build a reputation on what you are going to do.
BitterTea (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 21, 2011, 05:22:52 PM
 #7

OTR is much better than PGP/GPG when using via IM, because you got two extra features: Deniability and forward secrecy.

From http://www.cypherpunks.ca/otr/
Quote
Deniability
    The messages you send do not have digital signatures that are checkable by a third party. Anyone can forge messages after a conversation to make them look like they came from you. However, during a conversation, your correspondent is assured the messages he sees are authentic and unmodified.

Perfect forward secrecy
    If you lose control of your private keys, no previous conversation is compromised.

I wasn't aware of those benefits, thank you. I've switched back to Pidgin which supports OTR.
PCRon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 46
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 24, 2011, 06:16:01 PM
 #8

I can't help but notice, bittertea you have taken apple polishing to a new level.
BitterTea (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 24, 2011, 07:00:34 PM
 #9

I can't help but notice, bittertea you have taken apple polishing to a new level.

I have avatars turned off in my preferences, so at first I wasn't sure to what you were referring.

It's actually a reference to the Golden Apple of Discord and/or Discordianism.

Hail Eris.
Binford 6100
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500


PGP OTC WOT: EB7FCE3D


View Profile
June 27, 2011, 09:44:31 PM
 #10

Hail Eris.
Hail Discordia.

You can't build a reputation on what you are going to do.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!