DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
|
|
July 29, 2013, 03:29:32 AM |
|
Is bitcoin 2 coming out next month?
No.
Everybody knows eleven is my favorite number, so if there was going to be a major release of bitcoin it would be "Bitcoin 11". But it ain't gonna happen.
Only 11 kinds of people in the world, those who can count in binary and those who can't So what's the third type of people? (you said there were 11) 11=2 in binary Really? Not in any binary I know. What is 1, 2, 3 in binary? 1 = 2 = 3 =
|
|
|
|
LightRider
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1500
Merit: 1022
I advocate the Zeitgeist Movement & Venus Project.
|
|
July 29, 2013, 03:58:53 AM |
|
I'm disappointed in you Phinnaeus.
01 = 1 10 = 2 11 = 3
|
|
|
|
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1014
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
|
|
July 29, 2013, 04:16:19 AM |
|
I'm disappointed in you Phinnaeus.
01 = 1 10 = 2 11 = 3
He actually meant "nary" which in old english is defined as "not one." The "bi" prefix is naturally a sexual orientation conjugation he chose to append.
|
Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
|
|
|
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
|
July 29, 2013, 05:40:47 AM |
|
I'm disappointed in you Phinnaeus.
01 = 1 10 = 2 11 = 3
He actually meant "nary" which in old english is defined as "not one." The "bi" prefix is naturally a sexual orientation conjugation he chose to append. He meant: Only 11 10 kinds of people in the world, those who can count in binary and those who can't
|
|
|
|
MineForeman.com
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 29, 2013, 05:42:02 AM |
|
I'm disappointed in you Phinnaeus.
01 = 1 10 = 2 11 = 3
He actually meant "nary" which in old english is defined as "not one." The "bi" prefix is naturally a sexual orientation conjugation he chose to append. He meant: Only 11 10 kinds of people in the world, those who can count in binary and those who can't I assume that makes me one of those that can again . Neil
|
|
|
|
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
|
|
July 29, 2013, 05:48:00 AM |
|
01 = 1 10 = 2 11 = 3
If 01 + 10 = 11 = 3, Then why doesn't 01 + 11 = 12 = 4?
|
|
|
|
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
|
|
July 29, 2013, 06:12:26 AM |
|
01 = 1 10 = 2 11 = 3
If 01 + 10 = 11 = 3, Then why doesn't 01 + 11 = 12 = 4?
Are you joking? It is hard to tell.
|
|
|
|
LightRider
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1500
Merit: 1022
I advocate the Zeitgeist Movement & Venus Project.
|
|
July 29, 2013, 06:12:40 AM |
|
01 = 1 10 = 2 11 = 3
If 01 + 10 = 11 = 3, Then why doesn't 01 + 11 = 12 = 4?
Because math is rigorous, regardless of base.
|
|
|
|
AliceWonder
|
|
July 29, 2013, 08:14:19 AM |
|
To answer the question (serious or not, some may not understand), we normally use base 10 because there are 10 symbols in our integer counting system, 0-9 Base2 has 2 - 0 and 1 Base16 (hex) has 16 - 0-F so Base10 | Base2 | hex | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 100 | 4 | 5 | 101 | 5 | 6 | 110 | 6 | 7 | 111 | 7 | 8 | 1000 | 8 | 9 | 1001 | 9 | 10 | 1010 | A | 11 | 1011 | B | 12 | 1100 | C | 13 | 1101 | D | 14 | 1110 | E | 15 | 1111 | F | 16 | 10000 | 10 | 17 | 10001 | 11 | 18 | 10010 | 12 | 19 | 10011 | 13 | 20 | 10100 | 14 | 21 | 10101 | 15 | 22 | 10110 | 16 | 23 | 10111 | 17 | 24 | 11000 | 18 | 25 | 11001 | 19 | 26 | 11010 | 1A | 27 | 11011 | 1B | 28 | 11100 | 1C | 29 | 11101 | 1D | 30 | 11110 | 1E | 31 | 11111 | 1F | 32 | 100000 | 20 | 33 | 100001 | 21 |
As a modern byte has 8 bits (historically not always the case) there are 256 different values a byte can have - sqrt(256) = 16 so we can describe a byte with two hex numbers - which is why you see hex used so often when talking about the value of a byte (essentially it is base256 with 00-FF as the possible values)
|
|
|
|
Garr255
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
What's a GPU?
|
|
July 29, 2013, 08:16:09 AM |
|
I love threads like this
|
“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” -- Mahatma Gandhi
Average time between signing on to bitcointalk: Two weeks. Please don't expect responses any faster than that!
|
|
|
oleganza
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 200
Merit: 104
Software design and user experience.
|
|
July 29, 2013, 10:25:55 AM |
|
Funny how some people get angry about "Bitcoin 2" proposal (not in this thread, I guess, but somewhere on reddit). The truth is, Bitcoin is 100% voluntary. I like my current Bitcoin and don't need to care much about Bitcoin 2. If, however, there begins a noticeable market with Bitcoin 2 guys (will never happen, but let's imagine that), I can decide to voluntarily join this market. Or not. Either way I have choice and everyone's happy.
|
Bitcoin analytics: blog.oleganza.com / 1TipsuQ7CSqfQsjA9KU5jarSB1AnrVLLo
|
|
|
solex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1006
100 satoshis -> ISO code
|
|
July 29, 2013, 10:36:15 AM |
|
To answer the question (serious or not, some may not understand), we normally use base 10 because there are 10 symbols in our integer counting system, 0-9 Base2 has 2 - 0 and 1 Base16 (hex) has 16 - 0-F
I have always thought that humanity would have done much better with base-12 counting system than base-10. The Babylonians had the right idea with 60 as the most useful number, because of its divisibility, where 10 is very much inferior. The metric system would be much better in base-12 too. Too late now though!
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
July 29, 2013, 11:21:05 AM |
|
Also there's base 58 as used in all our BTC addresses It's also a bastardisation of base 58 to avoid having 0, I, O and l 0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuv becomes 123456789ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijkmnopqrstuvwxyz
|
|
|
|
phatsphere
|
|
July 29, 2013, 11:37:06 AM |
|
He meant: Only 11 10 kinds of people in the world, those who can count in binary and those who can't
in unary (like binary, but only one), it's 2. 1 = 1 11 = 2 111 = 3 1111 = 4 ....
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
July 29, 2013, 11:40:38 AM |
|
... I presume everyone does know the original joke right? There Are 3 Types Of People In The World, Those Who Are Good At Math And Those Who Aren't ...
|
|
|
|
AliceWonder
|
|
July 29, 2013, 01:09:27 PM |
|
Also there's base 58 as used in all our BTC addresses It's also a bastardisation of base 58 to avoid having 0, I, O and l 0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuv becomes 123456789ABCDEFGHJKLMNPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijkmnopqrstuvwxyz base58 usually leaves out two of 0, O and o plus I and l. Point of base58 is base 62 but w/o characters that are too similar. I've not seen a lot of implementations but most I have seen keep 0 so that the first 10 are the same. bitcoin doesn't. Also most I've seen have lower case letters before upper. But there is no standard for base58 as far as I know.
|
|
|
|
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
|
|
July 29, 2013, 04:31:50 PM |
|
To answer the question (serious or not, some may not understand), we normally use base 10 ...
All number systems are base 10 if you think about it. The word "base 10" is horribly ambiguous for meaning base-ten.
|
|
|
|
fex
|
|
July 29, 2013, 09:15:03 PM |
|
I'm disappointed in you Phinnaeus.
01 = 1 10 = 2 11 = 3
He actually meant "nary" which in old english is defined as "not one." The "bi" prefix is naturally a sexual orientation conjugation he chose to append. He meant: Only 11 10 kinds of people in the world, those who can count in binary and those who can't Of course, a more obvious correction would have been: Only 11 kinds of people in the world, those who can count in binary DEC Radix-50 and those who can't.
|
|
|
|
atomium
Donator
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 252
Study the past, if you would divine the future.
|
|
July 30, 2013, 12:02:38 AM |
|
bitcoin 2 will come with a retina display.
+1 Can't wait for this
|
|
|
|
|