Do not bet with Matthew N. Wright without an escrow on both sides

[Grinder]

I will bet you 100 Bitcoins that Matthew will fulfill his end of the deal within 3 weeks after a conclusion.

This means that if Matthew wins (pirate pays out) Matthew is done and I get 100 Bitcoins from you.
If it is decided that Matthew loses and has to pay you Ƀ250, and he /doesn't/ do so within 3 weeks, I will give you 100 Bitcoins. (The 3 weeks start after it's been decided that Matthew loses. Suggestions on how this should be decided?)

We can use a two-sided escrow on this bet if you want to. I've got a decent rating though.

I'll bet 1 BTC that BTCurious will honor this bet!

[Transisto]

escrow ? what is it you don't understand ?

The escrow is the public log of the thread, the enforcement method is bitcointalk/online reputation.

Why would you need an escrow on your side ?

[556j]

escrow ? what is it you don't understand ?

The escrow is the public log of the thread, the enforcement method is bitcointalk/online reputation.

Why would you need an escrow on your side ?

Why not? That's the better question.

[dust]

Bumping for "I told you so".

[Hexadecibel]

Bumping for "I told you so".

Heh heh yup..

Im happy at least he got his Scammer tag.

[conspirosphere.tk]

dust: I think at this point many would be interested in knowing about your portfolio.
This may be the right time for you to launch an investment fund or newsletter.
 

[mobodick]

escrow ? what is it you don't understand ?

The escrow is the public log of the thread, the enforcement method is bitcointalk/online reputation.

Why would you need an escrow on your side ?

Because money > bitcointalk/online reputation maybe?