Bitcoin Buyer Reload
|
|
April 19, 2015, 06:46:47 PM |
|
It has been brought to our attention that POS has started earlier than was originally intended. We are currently investigating the issue and will either prepare a fix or we will continue and just increase the coin amount. We deeply apologise for the confusion and we will post more details as soon as we have decided what course to take. Let me make clear though, we will not be relaunching so keep mining!
Don't mess with staking. If it isn't broke don't fix it. In the long run, you will regret forking your coin if you don't have to. Nothing pisses off miners and investors more than devs increasing the coin supply. In the old days this was a favorite self-destructive passtime that coin devs participated in. Agreed, let it be. It's part of the game and will probably do more harm than good if you try to do anything about it now. agreed, just go with the flow. it is what it is now. increase of coin supply does not always mean that it is something bad. it might turn out to be something good when the time arrives. also i have noticed that the more coin that will be distributed, the more likely it happen that people will be interested in mining it
|
|
|
|
minerpools
|
|
April 19, 2015, 07:24:21 PM |
|
Oh I see the hashrate is spread fairly (sarcasm).. Quite a large number of pools, all the hash at one. Same shit different day Yeah, seems to be the norm lately.
|
|
|
|
moeseph
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
April 19, 2015, 07:40:01 PM |
|
Oh I see the hashrate is spread fairly (sarcasm).. Quite a large number of pools, all the hash at one. Same shit different day Yeah, seems to be the norm lately. Well, if all the pools had the same fair fee then there would be more fair spreads. All the pools have different fees so everyone with lots of hashrate would definitely go for the pools that charge less.
|
|
|
|
minerpools
|
|
April 19, 2015, 07:42:18 PM |
|
Oh I see the hashrate is spread fairly (sarcasm).. Quite a large number of pools, all the hash at one. Same shit different day Yeah, seems to be the norm lately. Well, if all the pools had the same fair fee then there would be more fair spreads. All the pools have different fees so everyone with lots of hashrate would definitely go for the pools that charge less. Fees are for covering server and operational costs, a 1% fee doesn't even come close to doing that unless you're doing something else on the backend with people's hashes.
|
|
|
|
moeseph
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
April 19, 2015, 07:44:03 PM |
|
Oh I see the hashrate is spread fairly (sarcasm).. Quite a large number of pools, all the hash at one. Same shit different day Yeah, seems to be the norm lately. Well, if all the pools had the same fair fee then there would be more fair spreads. All the pools have different fees so everyone with lots of hashrate would definitely go for the pools that charge less. Fees are for covering server and operational costs, a 1% fee doesn't even come close to doing that unless you're doing something else on the backend with people's hashes. Suchpool is charging us a 2% fee but i'm still mining there to try to even it out but, they're charging double what other pools are charging.
|
|
|
|
louiseth1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Bitfarms.io
|
|
April 19, 2015, 07:45:01 PM |
|
Oh I see the hashrate is spread fairly (sarcasm).. Quite a large number of pools, all the hash at one. Same shit different day Yeah, seems to be the norm lately. Well, if all the pools had the same fair fee then there would be more fair spreads. All the pools have different fees so everyone with lots of hashrate would definitely go for the pools that charge less. Fees are for covering server and operational costs, a 1% fee doesn't even come close to doing that unless you're doing something else on the backend with people's hashes. Suchpool is charging us a 2% fee but i'm still mining there to try to even it out but, they're charging double what other pools are charging. But rock a 6 dedicated cluster with 10gbps internet feeds and 100+gbps ddos mitigation. Quality hosting has a price, and time? If you want to work for free, pm me i'll hire you in the team and pay you 0, that makes sense?
|
Bitfarms.io - Powering Blockchains with Sustainable Energy
|
|
|
portice1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
April 19, 2015, 07:48:13 PM |
|
Oh I see the hashrate is spread fairly (sarcasm).. Quite a large number of pools, all the hash at one. Same shit different day Yeah, seems to be the norm lately. Well, if all the pools had the same fair fee then there would be more fair spreads. All the pools have different fees so everyone with lots of hashrate would definitely go for the pools that charge less. Fees are for covering server and operational costs, a 1% fee doesn't even come close to doing that unless you're doing something else on the backend with people's hashes. Are you tossing out blatant accusations now, or do you have some sort of proof? Bottomline, he (I'm assuming you are referring to supernova) performs. He is always the first up which counts for alot usually. If something goes wrong, he actively tries to make it right. His service is outstanding on all fronts and all you other pool operators need to stop crying in every single new coin thread.
|
|
|
|
shimlbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 19, 2015, 07:48:26 PM |
|
btw guys ealier pos blocks means less amount only 30 coins instead of Block 121 - 950 = 750 Coins Block 951 - 1400 = 550 Coins Block 1401 - 1900 = 425 Coins Block 1901 - 2400 = 325 Coins Block 2401 - 2850 = 250 Coins Block 2851 - 3500 = 190 Coins Block 3501 - 4000 = 105 Coins
|
|
|
|
NeutronCoin (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
April 19, 2015, 07:49:32 PM |
|
The PoW/PoS charts have being changed to reflect PoS starting early. No need to change anything if it works. We will go with the community request on this and Let It Be
|
|
|
|
shimlbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1001
|
|
April 19, 2015, 07:50:39 PM |
|
The PoW/PoS charts have being changed to reflect PoS starting early. No need to change anything if it works. We will go with the community request on this and Let It Be its not a big problem...only less coins than expected with more 30 coin blocks while pow stage
|
|
|
|
minerpools
|
|
April 19, 2015, 08:09:12 PM |
|
Oh I see the hashrate is spread fairly (sarcasm).. Quite a large number of pools, all the hash at one. Same shit different day Yeah, seems to be the norm lately. Well, if all the pools had the same fair fee then there would be more fair spreads. All the pools have different fees so everyone with lots of hashrate would definitely go for the pools that charge less. Fees are for covering server and operational costs, a 1% fee doesn't even come close to doing that unless you're doing something else on the backend with people's hashes. Are you tossing out blatant accusations now, or do you have some sort of proof? Bottomline, he (I'm assuming you are referring to supernova) performs. He is always the first up which counts for alot usually. If something goes wrong, he actively tries to make it right. His service is outstanding on all fronts and all you other pool operators need to stop crying in every single new coin thread. Was he the first pool up this time? Isn't the service from suchpool and minerpools good as well? No one's crying but unfair competition is very annoying.
|
|
|
|
louiseth1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Bitfarms.io
|
|
April 19, 2015, 08:11:30 PM |
|
I was just saying that the hashrate spread was not fair. Ultimately suprnova himself has nothing to do with it, the miners SHOULD be smart enough to distribute the hashrate even amongst all pool...
After all, isn't the CENTER MAIN GOAL of crypto to decentralize powers? Seems a lot of people just didn't get that part.
|
Bitfarms.io - Powering Blockchains with Sustainable Energy
|
|
|
portice1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
April 19, 2015, 08:19:02 PM |
|
Oh I see the hashrate is spread fairly (sarcasm).. Quite a large number of pools, all the hash at one. Same shit different day Yeah, seems to be the norm lately. Well, if all the pools had the same fair fee then there would be more fair spreads. All the pools have different fees so everyone with lots of hashrate would definitely go for the pools that charge less. Fees are for covering server and operational costs, a 1% fee doesn't even come close to doing that unless you're doing something else on the backend with people's hashes. Are you tossing out blatant accusations now, or do you have some sort of proof? Bottomline, he (I'm assuming you are referring to supernova) performs. He is always the first up which counts for alot usually. If something goes wrong, he actively tries to make it right. His service is outstanding on all fronts and all you other pool operators need to stop crying in every single new coin thread. Was he the first pool up this time? Isn't the service from suchpool and minerpools good as well? No one's crying but unfair competition is very annoying. Not saying if he was or wasn't, really didn't pay attention. Look at from a simple consumer point of view, I buy my coffee from "place A" for a real long time. The coffee always tastes good, it's always there when i need it, and priced well. Just because "place B" tells me to come drink their coffee because it's better, a bit more expensive, and they are upset because everyone is going to "place A" to buy their coffee and gosh darnit, it just isn't fair. People are creatures of habit it takes a bit to change those habits and if you and suchpool are not "crying" about it I apologize, thats just how it's been coming across the past couple days in the various threads. "Edited to state that 1 or 2% makes no diff to me honestly"
|
|
|
|
minerpools
|
|
April 19, 2015, 08:21:34 PM |
|
Oh I see the hashrate is spread fairly (sarcasm).. Quite a large number of pools, all the hash at one. Same shit different day Yeah, seems to be the norm lately. Well, if all the pools had the same fair fee then there would be more fair spreads. All the pools have different fees so everyone with lots of hashrate would definitely go for the pools that charge less. Fees are for covering server and operational costs, a 1% fee doesn't even come close to doing that unless you're doing something else on the backend with people's hashes. Are you tossing out blatant accusations now, or do you have some sort of proof? Bottomline, he (I'm assuming you are referring to supernova) performs. He is always the first up which counts for alot usually. If something goes wrong, he actively tries to make it right. His service is outstanding on all fronts and all you other pool operators need to stop crying in every single new coin thread. Was he the first pool up this time? Isn't the service from suchpool and minerpools good as well? No one's crying but unfair competition is very annoying. Not saying if he was or wasn't, really didn't pay attention. Look at from a simple consumer point of view, I buy my coffee from "place A" for a real long time. The coffee always tastes good, it's always there when i need it, and priced well. Just because "place B" tells me to come drink their coffee because it's better, a bit more expensive, and they are upset because everyone is going to "place A" to buy their coffee and gosh darnit, it just isn't fair. People are creatures of habit it takes a bit to change those habits and if you and suchpool are not "crying" about it I apologize, thats just how it's been coming across the past couple days in the various threads. "Edited to state that 1 or 2% makes no diff to me honestly" I like coffee So, btw should supernova be the only pool left then? @ocminer, shill accounts eh? nice.
|
|
|
|
OVRGRO
|
|
April 19, 2015, 08:23:30 PM |
|
got my first stake aka goodbye 520 coins
|
|
|
|
louiseth1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Bitfarms.io
|
|
April 19, 2015, 08:31:29 PM |
|
Not saying if he was or wasn't, really didn't pay attention. Look at from a simple consumer point of view, I buy my coffee from "place A" for a real long time. The coffee always tastes good, it's always there when i need it, and priced well. Just because "place B" tells me to come drink their coffee because it's better, a bit more expensive, and they are upset because everyone is going to "place A" to buy their coffee and gosh darnit, it just isn't fair. People are creatures of habit it takes a bit to change those habits and if you and suchpool are not "crying" about it I apologize, thats just how it's been coming across the past couple days in the various threads.
"Edited to state that 1 or 2% makes no diff to me honestly"
Makes total sense, I agree with you on that. Except the fact that this entire ecosystem is meant to be decentralized, and we're all doing the same mistakes that we've done in our current financial system which is to centralize too much the "power" into the same entities. Yes we operate a higher fee, but got a nicer interface and more staff. Matter of choice ultimately, but people seem to go where all the hash is, regardless where it's at (it's not always suprnova who has all the hash). It's kind of defeating the purpose of all of this.
|
Bitfarms.io - Powering Blockchains with Sustainable Energy
|
|
|
c-cex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1001
CryptoCurrency EXchange: https://c-cex.com
|
|
April 19, 2015, 08:31:51 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
louiseth1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Bitfarms.io
|
|
April 19, 2015, 08:32:46 PM |
|
|
Bitfarms.io - Powering Blockchains with Sustainable Energy
|
|
|
glen123
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1028
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 19, 2015, 08:33:15 PM |
|
Thx C-Cex The Race begun Next 300 BTC
|
|
|
|
|
|