ktev
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
 |
April 28, 2015, 09:47:28 PM |
|
LOL no I don't think Gavin is Satoshi, I am pretty sure the last time we heard of Satoshi was when Gavin was going to meet the CIA(?) and Satoshi disappeared.
AKA Gavin and Satoshi have different mindsets about Bitcoin and unless it was a long ruse of self talking they aren't the same.
Gavin visited the CIA after Satoshi disappeared. One of his last messages indicates that he didn't want to be associated with WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks has kicked the hornet's nest, and the swarm is headed towards us. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The grue lurks in the darkest places of the earth. Its favorite diet is adventurers, but its insatiable appetite is tempered by its fear of light. No grue has ever been seen by the light of day, and few have survived its fearsome jaws to tell the tale.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastfist
|
|
April 28, 2015, 09:49:31 PM |
|
'Until version 0.3.20, Bitcoin went into safe mode when a valid alert was received. In safe mode, all RPC commands that send BTC or get info about received BTC return an error. Current Bitcoin versions no longer go into safe mode in response to alerts.' - https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/AlertsThree people have the key: Theymos, Satoshi, and Gavin. Typically it has been used to inform users of URGENT updates. Correction: That particular Satoshi is Jeff Garzik, not the original. |
|
|
|
|
|
bennybong
|
|
April 29, 2015, 12:26:39 AM |
|
I think you guys are talking about the 'alert code' key. It is used to send an alert message to all bitcoin clients in the event of an emergency.
^^^^ This  How is it that an alert emergency key "controls bitcoin" Exactly. It's not. |
|
|
|
|
randy8777
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 29, 2015, 02:34:02 AM |
|
who cares. even if he is, he won't admit it. people here have too much free time. what i am interested in is that the developers bring bitcoin to the next level.
|
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4116
Merit: 7858
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
April 29, 2015, 02:49:46 AM |
|
who cares. even if he is, he won't admit it. people here have too much free time. what i am interested in is that the developers bring bitcoin to the next level.
What is the next level for bitcoin? I am curious ? Would it be made better for buyers using BTC? How do you think we can upgrade coins so that the public uses them and wants them thus driving the price of them higher. |
|
|
|
|
tss
|
|
April 29, 2015, 03:54:03 AM |
|
i thought it was hal finney  |
|
|
|
|
funtotry
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
Ever wanted to run your own casino? PM me for info
|
|
April 29, 2015, 03:59:49 AM |
|
Having the "no one owns bitcoin" thing is very good. Since there is no 1 famous creator of it, satoshi nakamoto is probably a fake name, people think the coin is just made "by the people", as they don't tie one person to it. If the US dollar was not stated it was made by the US, it would be though of the more "world currency", same thing with bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
Kprawn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1073
|
|
April 29, 2015, 06:33:45 AM |
|
Why do you not just ask Obama, he carry the secret with him in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_footballWhen Gavin went to the CIA, he revealed the identity to the CIA and they added the name to the little black book. It's listed just below the line that says .... Who killed Kennedy - ############### There, now you have a bigger and more interesting conspiracy theory.  |
|
|
|
|
Agestorzrxx
|
|
April 29, 2015, 12:12:08 PM |
|
I don't think he is satoshi, apparently, satoshi didn't want to reveal his identity, we may never know who is him, it's doesn't matter, he already left 5 years, bitcoin is still in development.
|
|
|
|
|
WhatTheGox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 812
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 29, 2015, 12:21:46 PM |
|
I don't think he is satoshi, apparently, satoshi didn't want to reveal his identity, we may never know who is him, it's doesn't matter, he already left 5 years, bitcoin is still in development.
I reckon it was a group tbh which is why its been so hard to track down any one person, maybe 1 person did the final work and released a collaboration project. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin Explorer
|
|
April 29, 2015, 01:33:02 PM |
|
Satoshi Nakamoto is probably someone still posting in here, under a moniker and most likely one of the main usual developers. It was probably planned to not want to have a public creator of Bitcoin to enforce the perception that Bitcoin is no one but everyone.
Yeah, he might still be lurking here, but we can't say. Lol at LitecoinGuy's pic |
|
|
|
cyrusthegreat (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
April 30, 2015, 09:34:46 AM |
|
the question is can you prove that Gavin Andresen is not satoshi nakamoto?,well i can! but first you have to make donations even if you dont care ho is satoshi, the story is good and can have a huge impact on the price of bitcoin and thats my goal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
s2
|
|
April 30, 2015, 11:21:50 AM |
|
"Satoshi Nakamoto" is likely a made up name as a sign of respect to the people who made Bitcoin possible.
Look up the Sato-Tate conjecture for example, if you discover the other meanings perhaps just use proofofexistence to log that you've figured it out but don't publish your findings as others may enjoy the rabbit hole.
We aren't meant to know who Satoshi really is and I respect he/she/they want to remain anonymous, this name is a beautifully clever way to make that obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 30, 2015, 02:20:53 PM |
|
"Satoshi Nakamoto" is likely a made up name as a sign of respect to the people who made Bitcoin possible.
...
Its not a made up name at all. Its a real name, it's just not the creators real name  |
|
|
|
|
tyz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3360
Merit: 1531
|
|
April 30, 2015, 02:26:42 PM |
|
I guess, Satoshi Nakamoto is not one person. "He" is a group of persons. Look at the different writing styles of him here on the board and the released whitepaper. Probably it has been written by a ghostwriter, but there is still the unbelievable perfect source code of version 0.01.
|
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
April 30, 2015, 03:19:22 PM |
|
"Satoshi Nakamoto" is likely a made up name as a sign of respect to the people who made Bitcoin possible.
...
Its not a made up name at all. Its a real name, it's just not the creators real name well this isn't known, it could be his real name if he is really one person and not multiple people that have developed bitcoin(i still have my doubt about this) |
|
|
|
|
franckuestein
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1130
Truth will out!
|
|
April 30, 2015, 03:32:03 PM
Last edit: April 30, 2015, 06:40:56 PM by franckuestein |
|
wow, thanks for the info @cyrusthegreat! Do you think that we're stupid? if you want to know how and why send me donations to make a documentary
 |
[ AVAILABLE SIGNATURE SPACE ]
|
|
|
|
Joe_Bauers
|
|
April 30, 2015, 04:13:44 PM |
|
, but there is still the unbelievable perfect source code of version 0.01.
If the source code was perfect, we wouldn't be at version 0.10.1 Looking at the source code, to me, makes it pretty evident who wrote it. One of the main reasons that I am assuming Satoshi left is she was not liking the "godliness" that members of the community we starting to attribute to her. |
|
|
|
|
|
futureofbitcoin
|
|
April 30, 2015, 04:58:40 PM |
|
, but there is still the unbelievable perfect source code of version 0.01.
If the source code was perfect, we wouldn't be at version 0.10.1 Looking at the source code, to me, makes it pretty evident who wrote it. One of the main reasons that I am assuming Satoshi left is she was not liking the "godliness" that members of the community we starting to attribute to her. I find extremely annoying the people who go out of their way to use "her" or "she" instead of "him" or "he". Seriously. It's especially stupid when Satoshi is clearly a male name. |
|
|
|
|
|
Joe_Bauers
|
|
April 30, 2015, 05:18:22 PM |
|
, but there is still the unbelievable perfect source code of version 0.01.
If the source code was perfect, we wouldn't be at version 0.10.1 Looking at the source code, to me, makes it pretty evident who wrote it. One of the main reasons that I am assuming Satoshi left is she was not liking the "godliness" that members of the community we starting to attribute to her. I find extremely annoying the people who go out of their way to use "her" or "she" instead of "him" or "he". Seriously. It's especially stupid when Satoshi is clearly a male name. The only thing clear about Satoshi's name is that it's a pseudonym Sorry to ruin the idea that your "god" Satoshi is clearly a man. P.S. Not really, your annoyance shows you are another cog in the worldly wheel of problems. |
|
|
|
|
|
