Bobsurplus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Making money since I was in the womb! @emc2whale
|
|
May 19, 2015, 08:30:46 PM |
|
Attn: DEV / bitcoinmax88 , given the last 10 pages of this thread (which could use some cleanup) and continued small "dumps" or at least downward trend in price (yes we know you don't control price, etc. etc.) could you please provide some sort of further transparency re. VIRAL. I find it surprising at certain amounts of this coin dropping out of "weak hands" this soon/early a bit odd...especially given "where this coin is heading" kind of talk.
Just asking given the recent 'coming to light' details in another thread on this forum (I wil refrain from posting the link) and also to put to rest some rumors abound re. any sort of back-door ICO deals that were done with either groups or manipulators. Given the amount of hype and expectations of your coin I think it's fair to ask already at this point, regardless if you're ahead of schedule or not (really that doesn't mean much to the avg investor).
I, like others, understand it will take time to get things moving regardless, but just asking for as much transparency and updates as possible on VIRAL.
Also what is a bit strange, is that the trading volume exceeds the amount of coins sold in the ICO. And it's been only one week. Basically every coin has been traded at least once, while "strong hands" are staking and hodling.
The dev team will hold 5% of the total coins being bought during current phase crowdfund and second phase. The entire dev team is in agreement that this 5% holding will be held in a wallet that will be listed publicly for transparency. This wallet can and will be consulted by any interested parties when it comes to the dev holding actions.
Has this 5% wallet been published yet? So what are ou saying there? and yeah... I think the wallets are in the op.
|
|
|
|
Bank_sy
|
|
May 19, 2015, 08:32:02 PM |
|
Attn: DEV / bitcoinmax88 , given the last 10 pages of this thread (which could use some cleanup) and continued small "dumps" or at least downward trend in price (yes we know you don't control price, etc. etc.) could you please provide some sort of further transparency re. VIRAL. I find it surprising at certain amounts of this coin dropping out of "weak hands" this soon/early a bit odd...especially given "where this coin is heading" kind of talk.
Just asking given the recent 'coming to light' details in another thread on this forum (I wil refrain from posting the link) and also to put to rest some rumors abound re. any sort of back-door ICO deals that were done with either groups or manipulators. Given the amount of hype and expectations of your coin I think it's fair to ask already at this point, regardless if you're ahead of schedule or not (really that doesn't mean much to the avg investor).
I, like others, understand it will take time to get things moving regardless, but just asking for as much transparency and updates as possible on VIRAL.
Also what is a bit strange, is that the trading volume exceeds the amount of coins sold in the ICO. And it's been only one week. Basically every coin has been traded at least once, while "strong hands" are staking and hodling.
The dev team will hold 5% of the total coins being bought during current phase crowdfund and second phase. The entire dev team is in agreement that this 5% holding will be held in a wallet that will be listed publicly for transparency. This wallet can and will be consulted by any interested parties when it comes to the dev holding actions.
Has this 5% wallet been published yet? So what are ou saying there? and yeah... I think the wallets are in the op. I think he is asking... hello dev! can you tell me what everyone is doing with every viral that they own?
|
|
|
|
nemo
|
|
May 19, 2015, 08:41:03 PM |
|
Say I have 2 coins. I stake one and sell the other one. The guy who I sold that coin to sells it to someone else. So 1 coin is being staked and 2 coins have been sold out of an original 2 coins. Does that mean every single coin I have has been sold? No.
|
|
|
|
illodin
|
|
May 19, 2015, 08:43:03 PM |
|
Attn: DEV / bitcoinmax88 , given the last 10 pages of this thread (which could use some cleanup) and continued small "dumps" or at least downward trend in price (yes we know you don't control price, etc. etc.) could you please provide some sort of further transparency re. VIRAL. I find it surprising at certain amounts of this coin dropping out of "weak hands" this soon/early a bit odd...especially given "where this coin is heading" kind of talk.
Just asking given the recent 'coming to light' details in another thread on this forum (I wil refrain from posting the link) and also to put to rest some rumors abound re. any sort of back-door ICO deals that were done with either groups or manipulators. Given the amount of hype and expectations of your coin I think it's fair to ask already at this point, regardless if you're ahead of schedule or not (really that doesn't mean much to the avg investor).
I, like others, understand it will take time to get things moving regardless, but just asking for as much transparency and updates as possible on VIRAL.
Also what is a bit strange, is that the trading volume exceeds the amount of coins sold in the ICO. And it's been only one week. Basically every coin has been traded at least once, while "strong hands" are staking and hodling.
The dev team will hold 5% of the total coins being bought during current phase crowdfund and second phase. The entire dev team is in agreement that this 5% holding will be held in a wallet that will be listed publicly for transparency. This wallet can and will be consulted by any interested parties when it comes to the dev holding actions.
Has this 5% wallet been published yet? So what are ou saying there? and yeah... I think the wallets are in the op. Thanks I missed the addresses from the OP on the first read. However, the addresses listed are empty.
|
|
|
|
Bobsurplus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Making money since I was in the womb! @emc2whale
|
|
May 19, 2015, 09:28:31 PM |
|
Attn: DEV / bitcoinmax88 , given the last 10 pages of this thread (which could use some cleanup) and continued small "dumps" or at least downward trend in price (yes we know you don't control price, etc. etc.) could you please provide some sort of further transparency re. VIRAL. I find it surprising at certain amounts of this coin dropping out of "weak hands" this soon/early a bit odd...especially given "where this coin is heading" kind of talk.
Just asking given the recent 'coming to light' details in another thread on this forum (I wil refrain from posting the link) and also to put to rest some rumors abound re. any sort of back-door ICO deals that were done with either groups or manipulators. Given the amount of hype and expectations of your coin I think it's fair to ask already at this point, regardless if you're ahead of schedule or not (really that doesn't mean much to the avg investor).
I, like others, understand it will take time to get things moving regardless, but just asking for as much transparency and updates as possible on VIRAL.
Also what is a bit strange, is that the trading volume exceeds the amount of coins sold in the ICO. And it's been only one week. Basically every coin has been traded at least once, while "strong hands" are staking and hodling.
The dev team will hold 5% of the total coins being bought during current phase crowdfund and second phase. The entire dev team is in agreement that this 5% holding will be held in a wallet that will be listed publicly for transparency. This wallet can and will be consulted by any interested parties when it comes to the dev holding actions.
Has this 5% wallet been published yet? So what are ou saying there? and yeah... I think the wallets are in the op. Thanks I missed the addresses from the OP on the first read. However, the addresses listed are empty. I tracked the coins to here.. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/viral/address.dws?VQJKyYj8N8FjUvux3akatvWy5mWZbCQFKh.htmAll still together... Im looking at my wallet now and because of staking my wallet seems to shuffle coins around. Im not the best blockchain analyzer but im sure someone will figure this out but I see the coins are still sitting so thats a good sign.
|
|
|
|
ViralDev (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
May 19, 2015, 10:27:56 PM |
|
Hello everyone, 180,000 VIRAL was initially sent to the Viral Developer Fund (VCs3KAQ88tLM9yLyTuewKE1TZoqPkfd2zy) and has been staking since May 14, 2015. 25,000 VIRAL was initially sent to Viral Bounty Fund (VVpAFhcZR98L5m4RhCCEsR14eHwhBeZseb) and has been staking since May 14, 2015. The coins were not moved from their respective address but seems to have changed addresses while staking or when coins were sent for giveaways and Viral promotions. So far about 4,000 Viral has been given away. Here is a screen shot of the Viral Dev Fund and Viral Bounty Fund for full transparency since we have nothing to hide. Some coins are being staked so a small part of the full balance is not shown.
|
|
|
|
Bank_sy
|
|
May 19, 2015, 10:32:06 PM |
|
Hello everyone, 180,000 VIRAL was initially sent to the Viral Developer Fund (VCs3KAQ88tLM9yLyTuewKE1TZoqPkfd2zy) and has been staking since May 14, 2015. 25,000 VIRAL was initially sent to Viral Bounty Fund (VVpAFhcZR98L5m4RhCCEsR14eHwhBeZseb) and has been staking since May 14, 2015. The coins were not moved from their respective address but seems to have changed addresses while staking or when coins were sent for giveaways and Viral promotions. So far about 4,000 Viral has been given away. Here is a screen shot of the Viral Dev Fund and Viral Bounty Fund for full transparency since we have nothing to hide. Some coins are being staked so a small part of the full balance is not shown. thanks for clearing this up
|
|
|
|
neordicICE
|
|
May 19, 2015, 10:34:51 PM |
|
Hello everyone, 180,000 VIRAL was initially sent to the Viral Developer Fund (VCs3KAQ88tLM9yLyTuewKE1TZoqPkfd2zy) and has been staking since May 14, 2015. 25,000 VIRAL was initially sent to Viral Bounty Fund (VVpAFhcZR98L5m4RhCCEsR14eHwhBeZseb) and has been staking since May 14, 2015. The coins were not moved from their respective address but seems to have changed addresses while staking or when coins were sent for giveaways and Viral promotions. So far about 4,000 Viral has been given away. Here is a screen shot of the Viral Dev Fund and Viral Bounty Fund for full transparency since we have nothing to hide. Some coins are being staked so a small part of the full balance is not shown. Right on! We trust you so don't worry about everyone else.
|
|
|
|
lambdaE
|
|
May 20, 2015, 01:07:41 AM |
|
My wallet is having connecting problems can someone help? 0 connections
|
|
|
|
lambdaE
|
|
May 20, 2015, 01:09:40 AM |
|
Hello everyone, 180,000 VIRAL was initially sent to the Viral Developer Fund (VCs3KAQ88tLM9yLyTuewKE1TZoqPkfd2zy) and has been staking since May 14, 2015. 25,000 VIRAL was initially sent to Viral Bounty Fund (VVpAFhcZR98L5m4RhCCEsR14eHwhBeZseb) and has been staking since May 14, 2015. The coins were not moved from their respective address but seems to have changed addresses while staking or when coins were sent for giveaways and Viral promotions. So far about 4,000 Viral has been given away. Here is a screen shot of the Viral Dev Fund and Viral Bounty Fund for full transparency since we have nothing to hide. Some coins are being staked so a small part of the full balance is not shown. I can't see this in my wallet. 0 connections also. Where can I see coin control?
|
|
|
|
Bobsurplus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
Making money since I was in the womb! @emc2whale
|
|
May 20, 2015, 01:25:55 AM |
|
File settings options display.
|
|
|
|
Hollowman338
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 20, 2015, 02:37:51 AM |
|
The metrics page doesn't update. It seems it will check market and network status upon starting the wallet, but that's it. I need to restart the wallet to get updated metrics.
|
|
|
|
ubeenpaycoind
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 1
|
|
May 20, 2015, 04:13:50 AM |
|
hey bobo when u gonna pump viral looks like another shitcoin
|
|
|
|
hash512
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
May 20, 2015, 09:27:00 AM |
|
The metrics page doesn't update. It seems it will check market and network status upon starting the wallet, but that's it. I need to restart the wallet to get updated metrics.
Can you not just right click on the page and select reload?
|
|
|
|
choochimil
|
|
May 20, 2015, 09:41:57 AM |
|
The metrics page doesn't update. It seems it will check market and network status upon starting the wallet, but that's it. I need to restart the wallet to get updated metrics.
Can you not just right click on the page and select reload? He's right you know. I never tried that before.
|
|
|
|
Hollowman338
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 20, 2015, 12:20:31 PM |
|
The metrics page doesn't update. It seems it will check market and network status upon starting the wallet, but that's it. I need to restart the wallet to get updated metrics.
Can you not just right click on the page and select reload? Didn't try that, I will later. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
TrueAnon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 20, 2015, 01:11:34 PM |
|
Hello everyone, 180,000 VIRAL was initially sent to the Viral Developer Fund (VCs3KAQ88tLM9yLyTuewKE1TZoqPkfd2zy) and has been staking since May 14, 2015. 25,000 VIRAL was initially sent to Viral Bounty Fund (VVpAFhcZR98L5m4RhCCEsR14eHwhBeZseb) and has been staking since May 14, 2015. The coins were not moved from their respective address but seems to have changed addresses while staking or when coins were sent for giveaways and Viral promotions. So far about 4,000 Viral has been given away. Here is a screen shot of the Viral Dev Fund and Viral Bounty Fund for full transparency since we have nothing to hide. Some coins are being staked so a small part of the full balance is not shown. Right on! We trust you so don't worry about everyone else. Hence why I've made such inquiries...since nobody else has, so not sure why folks want to shoot my recommendations down. People see FUD and 'certain name' promoting or pushing a coin they get antsy, but everyone is different. The MORE transparency like this the better for something as "big" as VIRAL is supposed to be, especially in the public eye. So far they seem to be holding strong and proving themselves to be the real deal. I'm just hoping that will continue. The dev and those involved should know this and hopefully care about their own reputations as well as that of the VIRAL brand itself. When the business side of this coin kicks in for the near future we'll see just how well they do...have to back up the hype. I'm sure hoping the price per VIRAL will also show this VERY nicely. (without the usual whales/group manipulation...granted most of us can guess that will be there too, just have to watch the timing/charts). Public perception is vital if you want to succeed and be taken seriously...it can be swayed negatively very easily given social media today, especially in messed up crypto-land (as we all know).
|
|
|
|
favdesu
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 20, 2015, 01:47:14 PM |
|
how/where do I find my connected twitter nodes?
|
|
|
|
NoobKidOnTheBlock
|
|
May 20, 2015, 03:26:27 PM |
|
Hey I would just like to throw something out there that the people behind VIRAL need to seriously contain their investors or their people because they are nonstop ranting nonstop everyday on Twitter at people and to be honest it's not helping the coin out in my opinion at all. I mean I am holding VIRAL and that's because I listened to myself and decided to go with the concepts and the ideas that the coin has not the people who are behind it. If VIRAL is going to be a huge success like you guys are planning for it to be then you seriously need to tell some people to calm down a bit because it certainly doesn't come across professional or inviting when people are losing their shit on people FUDDING VIRAL because let's be honest did Guerbuez honestly think that he would launch a coin and no one would SCREAM SCAM? That's a fucking laugh and a half right there!! Guerbuez knew that this coin would get haters from the moment he attached his name on it and I understand that any publicity is good publicity because the Twitter feeds are exploding with VIRAL this and VIRAL that which "Hey that's a good thing " But the people who are lashing out at people and calling them names and insulting them like a teenager would, well that's the kinds of things that won't help this coin get anywhere!! I've said it once and I'll say it again "If VIRAL is as good as everyone claims for it to be then the coin will speak for itself and the charts will show the truth in the end!!!!" Don't feed the people who are bashing the coin and the people behind it just let them rant because eventually they will get bored and move onto something else! But honestly it is in my opinion not helping people who don't know whether or not they would like to invest in VIRAL when there are VIRAL CRAZIES freaking out at anyone who says BOO about VIRAL! Those are the kind of actions that will scare someone off of a coin and make them believe all the FUD and the bashers! I know this and you all know this so please for the sake of proving that your coin really is going to be a huge thing LEAVE THEM ALONE!! There is no need for name calling and people bashing on either sides and I have said that over and over! I don't care who Guerbuez is or what he has "apparently" done in his life, all I care about is that the people behind VIRAL are serious about the plans that they have for the coin and are working hard to accomplish their goals!! Anyways that's kind of just what I think about the whole VIRAL feuding scenario!! Cheers
|
▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ | | ... | ............NoobKidOnThe.BLOCK.....
|
|
|
|
|
buddynuno
|
|
May 20, 2015, 03:44:49 PM |
|
Well said Lets keep the good vibes up people
|
|
|
|
|