is this using the ppcoin 2.0 software ?
This has potential. Will each chain have its own daemon running in the end? I don't normally use an alternate wallet, but it needs to use the daemon in case there is an urgent update or something. Do you think it could be possible to let the user add more blockchains? Considering most chains use commands similar to BTC's protocol, I imagine it can't be too hard. Just a thought. I really like what you are doing.
Yes PPcoin 2.0 is what is being used and what is included in the package.
At this time I see no reason why the daemons could not run at the same time, as I do that now with the standard clients with BTC and LTC. Hot swapping is definitely one of my goals.
****The next release is going to be a big step forward as the client will use JSON to communicate with the daemon rather then opening a new daemon with commands and parameters to communicate with the primary instance of the daemon. I am experiencing near instant information retrievals when using the in house beta.*******I have also shrunk the size of the primary windows as not to be so obnoxious...
I am have having one issue with the JSON command set. When issuing a "walletpassphrase" command with the pass and time, I receive a "error 500" exception. I receive the same error when attempting to send from an encrypted wallet without unlocking it first. Originally I caught that exception and used it as the indicator that a wallet was encrypted and needed to be unlocked to send. But I cannot get the daemon to accept the "Walletpassphrase" command through JSON.
I noticed it was one of the couple of commands new to the PPCoin daemon.Edit: Sorry Sunny, late night, I see that it is in the original API spec.
If anybody has any clue, please let me know. I would really hate resorting to calling a new PPCoin daemon instance just for this one command.