★★ >> Offering loan for everyone with and without collateral << ★★

[Quickseller]

If the hacker was able to figure out what the OP's password is then he could have logged into his account and changed the repayment address.

IMO this is a good reason why you should not use a single repayment address as many lenders in the lending section like to do.

[Vod]

I don't really think someone modified the post, most probably I copy pasted some text from this thread to create my loan thread and forgot to change the address. Which is awkward.

It's still better than the OP being a scammer.   

[Moebius327]

I don't really think someone modified the post, most probably I copy pasted some text from this thread to create my loan thread and forgot to change the address. Which is awkward.

It's still better than the OP being a scammer.   

Yep, sorry for the confusion. I guess being too paranoid is not good as well.

[omegaflare]

All collateral should be held by a trusted third party.

QuickTroll: SHUT UP! Thank you. That's not your decision to make, dick.

[Vod]

All collateral should be held by a trusted third party.

QuickTroll: SHUT UP! Thank you. That's not your decision to make, dick.

It's simply a suggestion.  If the OP tries to hold collateral, there is a good chance he'll run off with it (collateral scam).  QS is just trying to warn the OP he will get negative trust if he tries this.

It's my suggestion too.   

[danielca9]

Loan of 0.15 btc
Reason buying friend a gift on purse
Btc address 1AmvY2FJ1to6ru7Fuh4fEc91ozqHijrRg2
Term length 7days
Collertal hide my ass account with 6montg subscription and auto renew

[MonkeyCoin11]

After a few weeks (i was in holiday) i am now back on bitcointalk and i have some stock to loan.
Contact me here on with a PM

[MonkeyCoin11]

bump

[tech_solutions]

Loan of 0.05 Btc
Reason to purchase gift for wife
Term Length: 5 days
Address: 1HYakPDMTv88sTZgZ6hPaUBzWm2DEELFQz

[MonkeyCoin11]

Loan of 0.05 Btc
Reason to purchase gift for wife
Term Length: 5 days
Address: 1HYakPDMTv88sTZgZ6hPaUBzWm2DEELFQz

Loan sended:
https://blockchain.info/tx/d078b9c30b73c8cd3894c01dc35819cff87c77c2fc36987146d591a09d57cfae

I am waiting your payment for thursday.
Amount to repay: 0.055BTC

[Quickseller]

Repayment address: 15V9ZNTezDkQabQYbAeqDVsz3Ke6dPq2zb

Who sent you 996af90179b15ef630ffde5a1de4b9dbbcc5a837473c383ffab26b8c945ae4fd and why? It was sent to you on May 26 but I don't see any loans that match that date/amount/time

[FACKYOU1]

Loan Amount : 0.03
Reason : Personal
BTC Address : 18bzij3abHnRh8FfFu6Ky39UckDJcDo9aZ
Term Length : 5 days

[kdhilip75]

Loan: 0.1 Btc
Reason : To buy A Grade A/c who is active in signature campaign with good reputation
Address: 32WULYAyeeErEZL38geNWoQsWmDXoihXvN
Term Length : 7 Days (signature payment waiting)

 

[MonkeyCoin11]

Loan: 0.1 Btc
Reason : To buy A Grade A/c who is active in signature campaign with good reputation
Address: 32WULYAyeeErEZL38geNWoQsWmDXoihXvN
Term Length : 7 Days (signature payment waiting)

 

Well, when people ask loan without reading my first post it's always making me laugh, especially with newbie.
Soooo, i won't lend you, find someone else.

[SebastianJu]

By the way Quickseller, i don't think it is needed to give every newbie asking for a loan without collateral a negative trust. For example i see, that kdphilip75 wanted that loan for buying an account i sell for a user. It's probable that he did not know that a collateral is needed. But regardless of that, getting a red trust for that is not needed at all since why would you need to tell everyone that he wanted a loan without collateral? He would not get a loan anyway and everyone could see already that he did not offer collateral. Why you need to write that again as red trust is something i wonder about.

At least his request looks genuine for me since he only asked because i demanded that he prooves he has that much coins. His request would not have been successfull anyway.

Any other reason why you think that is needed? Even if you think he might move on and try to scam... you don't know it and a neutral warning might be sufficient.

No, i wasn't asked by him, i only noticed that he suddenly has red trust.

[Panthers52]

Loan: 0.1 Btc
Reason : To buy A Grade A/c who is active in signature campaign with good reputation
Address: 32WULYAyeeErEZL38geNWoQsWmDXoihXvN
Term Length : 7 Days (signature payment waiting)

 

This is not going to protect the lender because he would have no way to recover the loan if you default, and the lender would have no way to force you to actually spend the money you receive on the loan to purchase an account.

It looks like SebastianJu wants to lend you this money though 

[MonkeyCoin11]

Repayment address: 15V9ZNTezDkQabQYbAeqDVsz3Ke6dPq2zb

Who sent you 996af90179b15ef630ffde5a1de4b9dbbcc5a837473c383ffab26b8c945ae4fd and why? It was sent to you on May 26 but I don't see any loans that match that date/amount/time

Some loan are make only by pm, anyway i don't see why i have to justified all my btc x)

By the way Quickseller, i don't think it is needed to give every newbie asking for a loan without collateral a negative trust. For example i see, that kdphilip75 wanted that loan for buying an account i sell for a user. It's probable that he did not know that a collateral is needed. But regardless of that, getting a red trust for that is not needed at all since why would you need to tell everyone that he wanted a loan without collateral? He would not get a loan anyway and everyone could see already that he did not offer collateral. Why you need to write that again as red trust is something i wonder about.

At least his request looks genuine for me since he only asked because i demanded that he prooves he has that much coins. His request would not have been successfull anyway.

Any other reason why you think that is needed? Even if you think he might move on and try to scam... you don't know it and a neutral warning might be sufficient.

No, i wasn't asked by him, i only noticed that he suddenly has red trust.

Hey nice to say it to me, but i don't give any red trust for it, so maybe next time check from who is the red trust.
If you are not blaming then it's ok.
I agree with you, giving redtrust only for asking is stupid so i never do it
I just refuse the loan because he did not even took time to read my first post where i explain rules, so i really don't want to loan to these users ^^

Loan Amount : 0.03
Reason : Personal
BTC Address : 18bzij3abHnRh8FfFu6Ky39UckDJcDo9aZ
Term Length : 5 days

Sorry i did not see your post, if you still need a loan pm me

[SebastianJu]

Repayment address: 15V9ZNTezDkQabQYbAeqDVsz3Ke6dPq2zb

Who sent you 996af90179b15ef630ffde5a1de4b9dbbcc5a837473c383ffab26b8c945ae4fd and why? It was sent to you on May 26 but I don't see any loans that match that date/amount/time

Some loan are make only by pm, anyway i don't see why i have to justified all my btc x)

By the way Quickseller, i don't think it is needed to give every newbie asking for a loan without collateral a negative trust. For example i see, that kdphilip75 wanted that loan for buying an account i sell for a user. It's probable that he did not know that a collateral is needed. But regardless of that, getting a red trust for that is not needed at all since why would you need to tell everyone that he wanted a loan without collateral? He would not get a loan anyway and everyone could see already that he did not offer collateral. Why you need to write that again as red trust is something i wonder about.

At least his request looks genuine for me since he only asked because i demanded that he prooves he has that much coins. His request would not have been successfull anyway.

Any other reason why you think that is needed? Even if you think he might move on and try to scam... you don't know it and a neutral warning might be sufficient.

No, i wasn't asked by him, i only noticed that he suddenly has red trust.

Hey nice to say it to me, but i don't give any red trust for it, so maybe next time check from who is the red trust.
If you are not blaming then it's ok.
I agree with you, giving redtrust only for asking is stupid so i never do it
I just refuse the loan because he did not even took time to read my first post where i explain rules, so i really don't want to loan to these users ^^

I think you got offended without reason and you told me to check first when you actually did not check yourself.

I wrote to Quickseller, which is the user who gave the requesting user a red trust. I did not address you there.

[MonkeyCoin11]

I think you got offended without reason and you told me to check first when you actually did not check yourself.

I wrote to Quickseller, which is the user who gave the requesting user a red trust. I did not address you there.

Ok no problem.
Sorry if i have been disapointing or agressive it was not the purpose

[SebastianJu]

I think you got offended without reason and you told me to check first when you actually did not check yourself.

I wrote to Quickseller, which is the user who gave the requesting user a red trust. I did not address you there.

Ok no problem.
Sorry if i have been disapointing or agressive it was not the purpose

No problem, there are others that would have been way worse, you tried to calm the things down. So i think it's a good sign of your character.