Bitcoin Forum
June 27, 2024, 09:50:30 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: The United States is where regime change is most badly needed.  (Read 1186 times)
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3822
Merit: 1373


View Profile
May 19, 2015, 12:35:57 AM
 #21

The OP is right on but most ordinary people out there would think that by getting rid of Obama then the regime would be changed, officially. Aside from Rand getting elected, the next republican or Hillary would continue on the same path. The foreign policy advisers that most of these candidates use are from certain think tanks in and around DC. They've been recycled for decades and you get the same people showing up in democratic and republican regimes and that why things keep going along w/ no major policy changes. Interventionism is the main foreign policy.

This is absolutely correct. And it is even worse, that is the tricks "they" went through to make the whole thing to be legal on the outside.

The regime change we need is for the American people to realize that the 9th Amendment is the key to individuals throwing off the shackles of the government - including things like the IRS - so that they can use the common law of man against the evildoers in government. The base for doing so is in the 9th Amendment.

The Cosntitution is reasonably good. It is the lack of knowledge of the common people. Before we make any kind of regime change that destroys the Constitution, we need to understand the basics of law and life.

Smiley

Cure your cancer at home. Ivermectin, fenbendazole, methylene blue, and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) are chief among parasite drugs. Find out that all disease is based in parasites or pollution, and what you can easily do about it - https://www.huldaclark.com/, https://thedrardisshow.com/, https://thehighwire.com/.
Chef Ramsay
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001



View Profile
May 19, 2015, 02:22:07 AM
 #22

The OP is right on but most ordinary people out there would think that by getting rid of Obama then the regime would be changed, officially. Aside from Rand getting elected, the next republican or Hillary would continue on the same path. The foreign policy advisers that most of these candidates use are from certain think tanks in and around DC. They've been recycled for decades and you get the same people showing up in democratic and republican regimes and that why things keep going along w/ no major policy changes. Interventionism is the main foreign policy.

This is absolutely correct. And it is even worse, that is the tricks "they" went through to make the whole thing to be legal on the outside.

The regime change we need is for the American people to realize that the 9th Amendment is the key to individuals throwing off the shackles of the government - including things like the IRS - so that they can use the common law of man against the evildoers in government. The base for doing so is in the 9th Amendment.

The Cosntitution is reasonably good. It is the lack of knowledge of the common people. Before we make any kind of regime change that destroys the Constitution, we need to understand the basics of law and life.

Smiley
Very astute point! You're like the first person to have ever brought up the 9th Amendment but are very correct in doing so. So many people who act like they revere the Constitution and Bill of Rights have glossed over that Amendment and most of them past the first two. I think the 9th and 10th are two of the most important and specifically the 9th that states that individuals have rights that should be recognized outside of what is enumerated in the BoRs like privacy and every other corollary of the right to life.

The rub is that w/ most of the media controlled, those that are active voters, donors and such get their news through this medium and the rest are stuck trying their best (us and other liberty lovers) while often being laughed at or ridiculed. Thankfully, Rand is running a decent campaign as a US Senator and hopefully he's done and is doing what it takes to win over more of those that participate in the system, namely retirees. Hopefully, he can get his targeted audiences to also lend a hand and tip the scales against the neocon dominated press and most of the GOP. I believe he's done what he had to to placate his fellow Senior US Senator from KY - McConnell (Senate Majority Leader) in certain situations w/o selling out to get his support and that of his donors. We'll see how it turns out but lets be active in the process to help effect change.
Benjig
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 19, 2015, 02:34:17 AM
 #23

and you all believe this is 'real' not something that has been discussed prior ??

todays world of politics revolves around the businesses that  control the politicians and the people who control the money supply of large nations (which in most cases if you look carefully are not the nations leaders)

 it is a big show

getting mad at obama , bush, putin, or any of these people is like being mad at Brad Pitt for burning the other guys hand in fight club and being a general dick.

Brad Pitt was doing what was written in the script and following the directions of the director on the set.


These politicians mentioned, Kerry, Putin , Obama,  consider them in a similar role.............. puppets

If those guys are puppets, What are we?
I now feel even more tiny
cryptocoiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 500


hyperboria - next internet


View Profile WWW
May 19, 2015, 07:21:08 AM
 #24

Is Washington Coming To Its Senses? — Paul Craig Roberts

May 15, 2015


Paul Craig Roberts

There is much speculation about US Secretary of State John Kerry’s rush visit to Russia in the wake of Russia’s successful Victory Day celebration on May 9. On May 11, Kerry, who was snubbing Russia on the 9th, was on his way to Russia, and Putin consented to see him on May 12.

As time passes we will find out why Kerry was snubbing Putin on May 9 and 3 days later was criticizing Washington’s puppet regime in Ukraine. For what is known at this time, a possible explanation is that Washington is coming to its senses.

If you watched the 1 hour 20 minute video of the Victory Day Parade, you are aware that the celebration sent a powerful message. Russia is a first class military power, and Russia is backed by China and India, whose soldiers marched with Russia’s in the parade.

So, while the increasingly irrelevant West, absorbed in its own self-importance, snubbed
the celebration of the victory that the Red Army gave them over Hitler, the three largest countries in the world were present united. Russia has the largest land mass, and China and India, also large land masses, have the world’s largest populations.

The celebration in Moscow made it clear that Washington has failed miserably to isolate Russia. What Washington has done is to make the BRICS more unified.

With the President of China sitting at the right hand of Putin, the celebration also made it completely clear even to the morons in the Obama regime that Washington is no longer the Uni-power.

Consider now the impact on Washington’s vassal states in Europe, the crux of the American Empire. Europeans are aware that two of the most powerful military states in history did not survive their invasions of Russia. Napoleon lost the Grande Army in Russia, and Hitler lost the Wehrmacht in Russia. It has dawned on Europeans that they are being shoved into conflict with Russia in the interest of Washington’s claim to be the World Hegemon. Europeans are accustomed to obey Washington, but when it came to being forced into conflict with Russia, Europeans began to express dissent. Signs of an independent European foreign policy appeared with Merkel and Hollande’s meeting with Putin to resolve the Ukrainian crisis orchestrated by Washington.

Faced with the failure of its policy of isolating Russia and the emergence of an independent foreign policy in Europe, Washington sent Kerry as a supplicant to Putin to work out a way to de-escalate the Ukrainian crisis. Putin being a peacemaker will permit Washington to save face. But this will not please the neoconsevatives or the military/security complex. The former are invested heavily in claims of Amerika Uber Alles, and the latter are lusting for the abundant revenues from a new cold, or hot, war.

Obama, Kerry, and Cameron have to become magicians. They have to transition from demonizing Putin to working with him.

Having failed with force against Russia, the West is now employing seduction. If Western peoples hope to escape from the Police State that Washington has imposed on the entire Western World, we must pray that Putin does not fall for the seduction.

There is no world leadership in the West. There is only selfishness and hubris. Western “leadership” is exploitative. The West loots the non-West and is now turning on itself with its looting of Ireland and Greece, with Italy, Spain, and Portugal the next targets for looting. The American public itself has been looted of its jobs, career aspirations, and civil liberties.

The Western model of “democratic capitalism” turns out to be neither democratic nor capitalist, but a form of fascism ruled by an oligarchy. The United States is where regime change is most badly needed.

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/05/15/washington-coming-senses-paul-craig-roberts/


Fuck yeah!!!! American revolution! Fuck banks! Fuck FRS! Fuck IRS! Don't pay taxes! Rob Wal-marts! Burn macdonalds restourants! Fuck police! Destroy american power! Let China and Russia take the lead! =)))))))))


Okurkabinladin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 506



View Profile
May 19, 2015, 09:49:01 PM
 #25

Frankly, US might be the only country safe from regime change on the planet. Reason? It has no US embassy on its soil.
galdur (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 20, 2015, 03:19:22 PM
 #26

Frankly, US might be the only country safe from regime change on the planet. Reason? It has no US embassy on its soil.

Let me edit this a little. US might be the only country on the planet where the regime is safe from regime change. Reason? It has no US embassy on its soil.

Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!