ndnhc[resolved]

[fox19891989]

IMO Carra23 is correct, first, you guys know nowadays there are many people complain in dadice OP, and I guess ndnhc's hater or dadice competitor wanna frame him, one reason is trying to destroy dadice sig campaign, second reason is to jeopardize dadice's reputation, and this thread was posted nowadays, connect these things, it is more suspicious than ndnhc himself, hmm, my conspiracy theory seems logical. 

Btw, it is easy to frame someone use a new account, and don't forget that account's prediction on 27th of May, isn't it too suspicious? It's the correct time when some guys troll in dadice OP, it is not the coincidence, I think it is a frame, an obvious set up, by his hater or dadice competitor.

[1715176221]

1715176221

[ajareselde]

IMO Carra23 is correct, first, you guys know nowadays there are many people complain in dadice OP, and I guess ndnhc's hater or dadice competitor wanna frame him, one reason is trying to destroy dadice sig campaign, second reason is to jeopardize dadice's reputation, and this thread was posted nowadays, connect these things, it is more suspicious than ndnhc himself, hmm, my conspiracy theory seems logical. 

Btw, it is easy to frame someone use a new account, and don't forget that account's prediction on 27th of May, isn't it too suspicious? It's the correct time when some guys troll in dadice OP, it is not the coincidence, I think it is a frame, an obvious set up, by his hater or dadice competitor.

Exactly my point.

[PolarPoint]

Went through the whole thread. The only fact is a newbie account, question2, extorted someone to pay into one of ndnhc's old addresses. Anyone could have done that. The only one who can find out the truth is theymos. He looks for the IP address of the newbie account and check against ndnhc's IP. Rest of us can only speculate.

The strange thing is question2 changed the address of his old post. If he wants to frame ndnhc, he shouldn't have.

[fox19891989]

Went through the whole thread. The only fact is a newbie account, question2, extorted someone to pay into one of ndnhc's old addresses. Anyone could have done that. The only one who can find out the truth is theymos. He looks for the IP address of the newbie account and check against ndnhc's IP. Rest of us can only speculate.

The strange thing is question2 changed the address of his old post. If he wants to frame ndnhc, he shouldn't have.

you are right, but admin won't tell us their ips, they can tell us the ips of these 2 accounts are same or not, anyone can request this.

If they have the same ip, these 2 accounts should be the same guy, because scammer won't change ip if he didn't change older address to extort, simple logic.

[Quickseller]

Went through the whole thread. The only fact is a newbie account, question2, extorted someone to pay into one of ndnhc's old addresses. Anyone could have done that. The only one who can find out the truth is theymos. He looks for the IP address of the newbie account and check against ndnhc's IP. Rest of us can only speculate.

The strange thing is question2 changed the address of his old post. If he wants to frame ndnhc, he shouldn't have.

you are right, but admin won't tell us their ips, they can tell us the ips of these 2 accounts are same or not, anyone can request this.

If they have the same ip, these 2 accounts should be the same guy, because scammer won't change ip if he didn't change older address to extort, simple logic.

The two accounts having the same IP range and/or same browser fingerprint would certainly prove that they are the same person however different IP ranges and different browser fingerprints would not prove they are different people.

[ndnh]

LOL!

Let me read the thread..

Edit: Seriously, it can't be. 
This post here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996260.msg11467648#msg11467648 was made on 27yth May and edited on 28th.
I didn't have access to internet on 28th, 29th, and 30th.

On 27th however I logged in for a few minutes I got, and arranged for Carra23 and bf4btc to take over. Former by email, and latter by a single PM - the only thing I did that day.

[izanagi narukami]

LOL!

Let me read the thread..

Welcome back ndnhc , you're surely need to explain this case to recover your trust.

[ndnh]

LOL!

Let me read the thread..

Welcome back ndnhc , you're surely need to explain this case to recover your trust.

Sure. I got to find what is wrong with the proof OP submitted. This is not the first time someone comes up with txs falsely acusing me of being someone else. Second time..

[achow101]

LOL!

Let me read the thread..

Welcome back ndnhc , you're surely need to explain this case to recover your trust.

Sure. I got to find what is wrong with the proof OP submitted. This is not the first time someone comes up with txs falsely acusing me of being someone else. Second time..

What was the first time?

[ndnh]

TXID 7ae108de4b2287bd3ba2c8a9a436c524456f9a7e4373a61eff58f18f783522db was signed by both 12Ey8KPWPcv22VVUdZWCTQFZH97Yy1XAuE and 1GjMtZop3K6JZW7emBWXC11ZhdQ1xEJwpm

The address 1GjMtZop3K6JZW7emBWXC11ZhdQ1xEJwpm was posted by ndnhc, among other places, here (archive - OP).

I checked.
Both addresses does not belong to me.  

Possibly it is the deposit address of some site, most probably a dice site. Could be PrimeDice or SatoshiDice, since I had it on 2013 December, No wonder it got linked.

[ndnh]

LOL!

Let me read the thread..

Welcome back ndnhc , you're surely need to explain this case to recover your trust.

Sure. I got to find what is wrong with the proof OP submitted. This is not the first time someone comes up with txs falsely acusing me of being someone else. Second time..

What was the first time?

Similar case. This time it was both SatoshiCircle's deposit address.. Many of this so called txid investigators ignore that the addresses people post here need not be their own.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=525975.msg9935220#msg9935220

[ndnh]

Funny. I should be able to send and receive amounts with same address. So, it cannot be the deposit address of a gambling site

http://btcoracle.com/search.php?s=1GjMtZop3K6JZW7emBWXC11ZhdQ1xEJwpm
Tho, I don't remember playing there..

Couldn't be inputs since I was selling it..

I am going to PM this question guy to know where he got the address from.  Hope he gets back online soon.


Hope OP is not attacking me because, what? I supported tspacepilot

[Quickseller]

Funny. I should be able to send and receive amounts with same address. So, it cannot be the deposit address of a gambling site

http://btcoracle.com/search.php?s=1GjMtZop3K6JZW7emBWXC11ZhdQ1xEJwpm
Tho, I don't remember playing there..

The address does not belong to satoshi circle, and that link supports the claim that it does not belong to satoshi circle. According to their FAQ, you must send funds from a wallet of which you control the private keys. If this address shows up as an address that played on satoshi circle then someone thought that they controlled such private keys. While it is possible that someone incorrectly made this assumption, the fact that 4 bets were made with this address would make this scenario unlikely, plus there is exactly one other address spend-linked to that address which does not match what generally happens with a exchange/site address.

Hope OP is not attacking me because, what? I supported tspacepilot

I am going to keep an open mind regarding your guilt/innocence, (it takes all of ~30 seconds to remove negative trust if it is determined I am incorrect about this) however these kind of statements are not going to do anything to make you look less guilty

[ndnh]

Funny. I should be able to send and receive amounts with same address. So, it cannot be the deposit address of a gambling site

http://btcoracle.com/search.php?s=1GjMtZop3K6JZW7emBWXC11ZhdQ1xEJwpm
Tho, I don't remember playing there..

The address does not belong to satoshi circle, and that link supports the claim that it does not belong to satoshi circle. According to their FAQ, you must send funds from a wallet of which you control the private keys. If this address shows up as an address that played on satoshi circle then someone thought that they controlled such private keys. While it is possible that someone incorrectly made this assumption, the fact that 4 bets were made with this address would make this scenario unlikely, plus there is exactly one other address spend-linked to that address which does not match what generally happens with a exchange/site address.

That is what I said. I initially thought the address was PD's, but it couldn't be since I found the btcoracle link.

But, it is weird. I know I am not question2. The proof should be wrong.. But, I should first get to know from where I got that address.
I PM'd question2.
It is too long back - 2013, I hope I remember soon.. My account was never bought or sold, so none of that complications.

And, I don't blackmail people. 
and for 0.1BTC? Really?

[ndnh]

And this whole thing could be framed very easily.. 

[ndnh]

Both addresses have not been used from 2014 Jan 5.

I really want to know where he got that address from.. But, I don't have much hope hearing back from question2.



Edit: The address was edited from 1 to I? LOL. I am almost sure this is framed.
I don't think anyone actually uses that address too.. Funny how far people go nowadays..

[DiamondCardz]

Both addresses have not been used from 2014 Jan 5.

I really want to know where he got that address from.. But, I don't have much hope hearing back from question2.



Edit: The address was edited from 1 to I? LOL. I am almost sure this is framed.
I don't think anyone actually uses that address too.. Funny how far people go nowadays..

[INVESTIGATION INTENSIFIES]

A'ight I'll watch the thread for any further developments. If you were framed, then we need to figure out who framed you...huh. That might be a bit difficult, but it's possible...

[Muhammed Zakir]

Both addresses have not been used from 2014 Jan 5.

I really want to know where he got that address from.. But, I don't have much hope hearing back from question2.
 -snip-

By looking at the sending and receiving transactions, it didn't look like a deposit address.

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/2016db899b159d2c?from_address=12Ey8KPWPcv22VVUdZWCTQFZH97Yy1XAuE

[DiamondCardz]

Both addresses have not been used from 2014 Jan 5.

I really want to know where he got that address from.. But, I don't have much hope hearing back from question2.
 -snip-

By looking at the sending and receiving transactions, it didn't look like a deposit address.

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/2016db899b159d2c?from_address=12Ey8KPWPcv22VVUdZWCTQFZH97Yy1XAuE

Hmm, you're certainly right, that address was definitely used often before. It doesn't seem to be a shared wallet address either, unless someone with more experience wants to correct me on that...? I could be wrong, you never know.

[ndnh]

Both addresses have not been used from 2014 Jan 5.

I really want to know where he got that address from.. But, I don't have much hope hearing back from question2.
 -snip-

By looking at the sending and receiving transactions, it didn't look like a deposit address.

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/2016db899b159d2c?from_address=12Ey8KPWPcv22VVUdZWCTQFZH97Yy1XAuE

Hmm, you're certainly right, that address was definitely used often before. It doesn't seem to be a shared wallet address either, unless someone with more experience wants to correct me on that...? I could be wrong, you never know.

I know. Great pick of an address!
I have my list of possible suspects.

PM'd you.
Sorry for making it that long.