anonymous2 (OP)
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 30, 2011, 11:37:58 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Be very wary of relying on JavaScript for security on crypto sites. The site can change the JavaScript at any time unless you take unusual precautions, and browsers are not generally known for their airtight security.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
kiba
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1014
|
|
May 30, 2011, 11:39:35 PM |
|
Meh. Free transactions are only done for charity anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
JackH
|
|
May 30, 2011, 11:43:41 PM |
|
How exactly are they going to exchange that large amount of funds into the network, to millions of accounts?
And through what method will they organize a large scale attack funding wise? Its going to take soo long time that.....well, lets see what happens
|
<helo> funny that this proposal grows the maximum block size to 8GB, and is seen as a compromise
<helo> oh, you don't like a 20x increase? well how about 8192x increase?
<JackH> lmao
|
|
|
grue
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1431
|
|
May 30, 2011, 11:44:53 PM |
|
too lazy to type address manually
|
|
|
|
Maged
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015
|
|
May 30, 2011, 11:45:58 PM |
|
Meh. We could use a good stress test.
|
|
|
|
|
Garrett Burgwardt
|
|
May 30, 2011, 11:46:31 PM |
|
I can't believe someone expected this to work.
|
|
|
|
|
Nick
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 57
Merit: 0
|
|
May 30, 2011, 11:47:38 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Guest
|
|
May 30, 2011, 11:50:33 PM |
|
One doesnt just make accounts in bitcoin.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Horkabork
|
|
May 30, 2011, 11:53:16 PM |
|
Haha. There's no way any Anon with any sort of influence on fellow Anons would come up with such an unimaginative name as "Operation Bitcoin."
|
|
|
|
goatpig
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 3654
Merit: 1345
Armory Developer
|
|
May 30, 2011, 11:54:11 PM |
|
Looking forward to it.
|
|
|
|
kwukduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1937
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 30, 2011, 11:54:52 PM |
|
i loled bring it on |
14b8PdeWLqK3yi3PrNHMmCvSmvDEKEBh3E
|
|
|
Bit_Happy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1040
A Great Time to Start Something!
|
|
May 30, 2011, 11:55:00 PM |
|
We do not reward thieves and terrorists: No one said a happy ending would be easy, this looks exciting.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Bit_Happy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1040
A Great Time to Start Something!
|
|
May 30, 2011, 11:57:55 PM |
|
I forget or never saw the exact details:
What is the Bitcoin protection against transaction spam attacks?
|
|
|
|
nickwit
Member
Offline
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
|
|
May 30, 2011, 11:58:53 PM |
|
Funny innit...
... bitcoin is qualitatively different from other currencies, in that its core-constituency is (at the moment) geeks.
But not just geeks. Ideologically-driven geeks. A community of ideologically-driven geeks, who are (in large part) doing this as an experiment.
So instead of "oooh... that's really scary, we're being threatened", our relationship with Anonymous (or some lone nerd) isn't one of adversary, so much as an experimental partner.
You say you can bring the network down? That's really interesting. Please... give it a go so we can see how resilient our system is... so we can see if there's some way we can improve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BitterTea
|
|
May 30, 2011, 11:59:25 PM |
|
IMO, Anonymous should set up an "official" (how?) Bitcoin address for each operation. I would gladly donate to fund operations that I morally supported and was reasonably certain would go to the correct individuals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DATA COMMANDER
|
|
May 30, 2011, 11:59:53 PM |
|
There's very little chance that Anonymous is actually behind this. They ought to love Bitcoin on principle. Someone should post a link to this in Anon's den. I have a feeling they will be annoyed by this imposter and may even go after him.
|
Tips are appreciated (very tiny tips are perfectly okay!) 13gDRynPfLH3NNAz3nVyU3k3mYVcfeiQuF
|
|
|
|
|
Lynzoi
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 10
|
|
May 31, 2011, 12:03:16 AM |
|
Haha. There's no way any Anon with any sort of influence on fellow Anons would come up with such an unimaginative name as "Operation Bitcoin."
Also I doubt they would act like anonymous and 4chan are the same thing... |
1HX4zSn3yQpVH3v9Sv5TNwMqbfXoBbMuNf
|
|
|
goatpig
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3654
Merit: 1345
Armory Developer
|
|
May 31, 2011, 12:03:54 AM |
|
I forget or never saw the exact details:
What is the Bitcoin protection against transaction spam attacks?
Supposedly the transaction fee. Although from my understanding, when the client was patched to handle 8 digits after the decimal, sending anything below 0.01 BTC would enforce a fee of 0.01 BTC. So instead of "oooh... that's really scary, we're being threatened", our relationship with Anonymous (or some lone nerd) isn't one of adversary, so much as an experimental partner. 4chan != Anonymous There was a long time ago when they used to lurk /b/, but today's 4chan user base has very little to do with Anonymous. |
|
|
|
|
