Nominate (insert name here) to the default trust list

[legendster]

Like I said this is a FUN post and lets not make it anymore serious than it needs to be.

If this is a fun post, you should consider moving it to off-topic

Well it is forum discussion so it does belong in Meta and it's a tad similar to when we had a vote on default trust and tried to replace it this ones just a tad more silly

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=914641.0

Since were nominating here is a suggested list now vote for your on call overlords  
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;suggest

And a trusting image
Layered 2015.05.16
 


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1062052.msg11388327#msg11388327

Modifying your trust settings to include people is more of a personal thing, doesnt affect the common trader across the forum.

[1714134982]

1714134982

[1714134982]

1714134982

[1714134982]

1714134982

[legendster]

Who made this list and why am I not listed???


Also, DiamondCardz??

Minimum TRADE streak required : 10. Minimum Trust points required : 55

[cakir]

Reminder; this survey can be manipulated you know that right?
How will you decide that who'll get into def trust?

Service Ann: I'll get you 10 votes for only 0.1 BTC

[legendster]

Reminder; this survey can be manipulated you know that right?
How will you decide that who'll get into def trust?

Service Ann: I'll get you 10 votes for only 0.1 BTC

Yes this survey can be manipulated, hence it is not to be taken seriously.

[Xialla]

ahh this is serious:) OP with some default trust bullshit promoting obvious scam in sig. campaign of some fucker with multiple bought accs. amazing.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1074272.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1076517.0

you know, when you are talking about trust and this stuff, you should start with yourself.

[CrackedLogic]

Monbux, devthedev and Blazedout419. My nominations. They're on mine.

[legendster]

ahh this is serious:) OP with some default trust bullshit promoting obvious scam in sig. campaign of some fucker with multiple bought accs. amazing.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1074272.0

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1076517.0

you know, when you are talking about trust and this stuff, you should start with yourself.

Start with myself for what ? I was with 777 for the last month previously with secondstrade, I even promoted coinharvest for a while but hey look what Tradefortress turned into.

My signature space is for rent and the current tenant has paid IN ADVANCE for 2 weeks. Who am I to say no if someone wants to buy something which is in my possession & I want to sell ??

Sure he maybe running a scam; maybe he isnt; but he hasnt scammed me. I stand by my words. I support trust scores obtained by legitimate trades not by playing pretend cop.

[legendster]

Monbux, devthedev and Blazedout419. My nominations. They're on mine.

They're already on the poll.

[CrackedLogic]

Monbux, devthedev and Blazedout419. My nominations. They're on mine.

They're already on the poll.

Yeah I know. I could only vote for one and that can be manipulated quite easily, so might as well just state it.

[legendster]

Monbux, devthedev and Blazedout419. My nominations. They're on mine.

They're already on the poll.

Yeah I know. I could only vote for one and that can be manipulated quite easily, so might as well just state it.

Statement well made

[legendster]

Added Deadley to the poll not only because of his awesome trade streak but also because he deserves a spot.

[Blazed]

Added Deadley to the poll not only because of his awesome trade streak but also because he deserves a spot.

What is this trade streak I keep hearing about exactly?

[koelen3]

This concept is rather cheeky.
And i see what you did their OP

[Muhammed Zakir]

Added Deadley to the poll not only because of his awesome trade streak but also because he deserves a spot.

What is this trade streak I keep hearing about exactly?

Probably,

-snip-
Rules to be nominated :

10 positive trade streak -
Which means trust score gained by personal grudge/favoritism wont be counted and it's a streak, implying you werent neg'd by someone recently (up to 10 trades in the past)
 -snip-

[dogie]

Reminder; this survey can be manipulated you know that right?
How will you decide that who'll get into def trust?

Service Ann: I'll get you 10 votes for only 0.1 BTC

Yes this survey can be manipulated, hence it is not to be taken seriously.

Hence this thread could really do with a non serious tag:

As this is a non serious thread and its been misunderstood by at least half of people, can we get a [non-serious] tag in the title please?

[BitcoinDistributor]

Had coffee and lunch with a couple of people on this list. I would like to nominate them as after speaking with them for a couple hours I fully trust them.

These people I met and talked with who I nominate are (we met under different names, none of you realized who I was at the time in the past):
-Xetsr
-Blazedout
-SaltySpitoon

People I vote for that I have not met:
-Devthedev

People who should be put on lower tiers of default trust (probationary / see what they do in future):
-Kluge (very young, sometimes jokes around, dont know too much about him)
-Deadley (havent interacted much but seems ok)

People who should NOT be on default trust (with reason):
-Stunna (is unethical and abuses trust in my honest opinion plus has promoted spam on multiple occasions, used to run a complete scam Primedice, after over a year of complaints finally changed provably fair system however server seed are obviously still rigged as awful streaks happen here more often than stastically feasible after simulation done of 10 x 10,000 rolls each)
-Bees Brothers (they own a business but imo are not active enough to need the default trust. Not saying they don't deserve it but honestly, why give default trust to people who won't be really looking for scammers? I mean they'll be busy with their business. Are they trustworthy though? Yes.
-Quickseller (my opinion on this guy should already be quite well known)
-Dogie Guy is probably the most hated guy on the default trust. Multiple examples of negative trusting people he simply doesn't like. Abuses trust, etc. Spams constantly in the past.

People who should be in the ultimate trust level, higher than all the rest and be color coded with GOLD around their name and trust:
-Kingofsports of course

[legendster]

Reminder; this survey can be manipulated you know that right?
How will you decide that who'll get into def trust?

Service Ann: I'll get you 10 votes for only 0.1 BTC

Yes this survey can be manipulated, hence it is not to be taken seriously.

Hence this thread could really do with a non serious tag:

As this is a non serious thread and its been misunderstood by at least half of people, can we get a [non-serious] tag in the title please?

But then the post will lose it's seriousness. The real reason behind holding a 'fun poll' is to promote a 'serious cause' i.e. the failure of the trust score system.

Now stop butt hurting cuz you're not on my list

[legendster]

..... why give default trust to people who won't be really looking for scammers? I mean they'll be busy with their business. Are they trustworthy though? Yes .......

You are missing the whole point, this post opposes giving trust points to scam busting. Scam busting is ethically wrong and is a short cut to gain massive amounts of trust without doing anything other than trolling around playing pretend cop.

Users should be encouraged to trade with even the most trusted people like Theymos / John K with one eye opened. The moment you introduce the age old 'reference' system it is a cocktail of disaster because then you are simply encouraging people to blindly trust the 'most trusted' person - who could turn out to be a scammer. Example : Tradefortress.

[BitcoinDistributor]

..... why give default trust to people who won't be really looking for scammers? I mean they'll be busy with their business. Are they trustworthy though? Yes .......

You are missing the whole point, this post opposes giving trust points to scam busting. Scam busting is ethically wrong and is a short cut to gain massive amounts of trust without doing anything other than trolling around playing pretend cop.

Users should be encouraged to trade with even the most trusted people like Theymos / John K with one eye opened. The moment you introduce the age old 'reference' system it is a cocktail of disaster because then you are simply encouraging people to blindly trust the 'most trusted' person - who could turn out to be a scammer. Example : Tradefortress.

In my opinion default trust should be given to those most active and most trustworthy on the forum. Beesbrothers aren't THAT active here. Are they trustworthy? Yes. But they are not active enough to watch over those they have on their trust list and ultimately have given default trust to if they were on the default trust tier one. That is where I was going with that post.

[legendster]

..... why give default trust to people who won't be really looking for scammers? I mean they'll be busy with their business. Are they trustworthy though? Yes .......

You are missing the whole point, this post opposes giving trust points to scam busting. Scam busting is ethically wrong and is a short cut to gain massive amounts of trust without doing anything other than trolling around playing pretend cop.

Users should be encouraged to trade with even the most trusted people like Theymos / John K with one eye opened. The moment you introduce the age old 'reference' system it is a cocktail of disaster because then you are simply encouraging people to blindly trust the 'most trusted' person - who could turn out to be a scammer. Example : Tradefortress.

In my opinion default trust should be given to those most active and most trustworthy on the forum. Beesbrothers aren't THAT active here. Are they trustworthy? Yes. But they are not active enough to watch over those they have on their trust list and ultimately have given default trust to if they were on the default trust tier one. That is where I was going with that post.

Well yeah that is a fair point, but they do 'deserve' to showcase their trade experience / seniority here over other members, but that has to be in a way that does not encourage the use of the 'Trust page'.