Nominate (insert name here) to the default trust list

[Bicknellski]

I believe there is a thread for that Diamond.

Been plenty of suggestions made.

For me my suggestions would be made there not off topic here.

NO ONE.

Dump the default. Let the community set the list.

And how do you propose we deal with shills?

That's the problem. You can scream for justice and total decentralization but at the end of the day it's extremely hard to properly implement. I haven't really seen an idea that would actually work better than DefaultTrust in implementation, so really it's either DefaultTrust or allow all members above a certain rank to give trusted feedback.

Holy fook? How do you deal with them now?

Let them get on the default trust I guess?

Name all the anonymous members on the Default Trust list please. Are you 100% sure the default list is free of people you wouldn't trust? See Quickseller as an example.

Oh no, I'm not saying DefaultTrust doesn't have corrupt people who use it for their own benefit. I'm very aware of that and I've seen it be used quite heavily as a tool to manipulate and advance personal interests.

But what's the best alternative?

[1715001259]

1715001259

[1715001259]

1715001259

[1715001259]

1715001259

[escrow.ms]

The quality of the trade doesnt matter here. The number of trades do.

Nope It's not just about number of trades, I can provide you a example here.
Projects https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=52439 (He stole approx 400k USD)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=393593.0

PS: I would like to see Kludge & Blazedout419 in Default trust list.

[redsn0w]

The quality of the trade doesnt matter here. The number of trades do.

Nope It's not just about number of trades, I can provide you a example here.
Projects https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=52439 (He stole approx 400k USD)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=393593.0

PS: I would like to see Kludge & Blazedout419 in Default trust list.

Blazedout419 is already in the Tomatocage's trust list, so he is also in the defaultTrust list (depth 2). The same thing for Kluge ( dserrano5, Tomatocage and BadBear's trust list).


If you trust Kluge & Blazedout419 add them to your trust list .

[escrow.ms]

The quality of the trade doesnt matter here. The number of trades do.

Nope It's not just about number of trades, I can provide you a example here.
Projects https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=52439 (He stole approx 400k USD)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=393593.0

PS: I would like to see Kludge & Blazedout419 in Default trust list.

Blazedout419 is already in the Tomatocage's trust list, so he is also in the defaultTrust list (depth 2). The same thing for Kluge ( dserrano5, Tomatocage and BadBear's trust list).


If you trust Kluge & Blazedout419 add them to your trust list .

They are already in my trust list since trust system was started.

[redsn0w]

The quality of the trade doesnt matter here. The number of trades do.

Nope It's not just about number of trades, I can provide you a example here.
Projects https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=52439 (He stole approx 400k USD)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=393593.0

PS: I would like to see Kludge & Blazedout419 in Default trust list.

Blazedout419 is already in the Tomatocage's trust list, so he is also in the defaultTrust list (depth 2). The same thing for Kluge ( dserrano5, Tomatocage and BadBear's trust list).


If you trust Kluge & Blazedout419 add them to your trust list .

They are already in my trust list since trust system was started.

Oh so have you asked to see them in the list of the user DefaultTrust (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=122551)? Sorry I misunderstood  . *basically in the depth 1 (if we have only the DefaultTrust user in our list).

[Blazed]

Yeah I am added to Philip and Tomato's lists already so adding me will do not much. I only joked about being added due to the use of trust scores since mine is fairly high. I do think that with public disputes the default trust has gotten much better.

[ianferns]

Whats the point of this thread ? Its not as that because of this thread people will be added to the default list .

[botany]

Like I said this is a FUN post and lets not make it anymore serious than it needs to be.

If this is a fun post, you should consider moving it to off-topic

[Michail1]

I can't vote.  It's a radio button instead of a check box, so it allows me to only vote for one person.  And, I am not on the list.

JK
Vote placed, but shouldn't it also be a lottery in that the voters win something.  Get paid to pick the right person?
Or, the voters have to donate 0.xyzBTC to place a vote.

JK Again.

[legendster]

@OP i see you Red , why are you even in the list , you don't qualify with 55 Trust

Its kinda getting repetitive. World Cup Host Nation Rule!! Read the full post.

That is one Hilarious way of doing it
I see Og Removed from list , Stupid me , he was already in DefaultTrust 1 , i thought he was in level 2.

Like I said, if just by HOSTING a world cup an undeserving nation can be a part of that World Cup then why not me ? This is a fun / hilarious post, been trumpeting that since the start.

[legendster]

This is a joke right?

Yes thats right.

Most of the people on that list are a joke, including yourself OP.

Not MOST people because they DO have a bigger dick trust score than you. People that put their trust on those people werent joking around when they added they added the trust points.

You even have negative trust yourself and are a classified scammer.

Oh really ? Now I didnt have a problem with any of the statements made so far, but I have a problem with this statement so why dont you show me proof / links / evidence where I have scammed even a single penny from anyone on the INTERNET ? (I'm easy to find through google) Go ahead and do it, oh & when you DONT find it then do youself a favor and keep your piehole shut & think twice before slandering anyone.

THIS is the very reason why I dont support the 'Trust system' any random motherfudger can come & create a baseless accusation and the accused would have to spend days trying to repair his image or at least explain to every damn moron that believes the accusation.

THIS is just goes to show what a failure this trust system really is.

[legendster]

The quality of the trade doesnt matter here. The number of trades do.

Nope It's not just about number of trades, I can provide you a example here.
Projects https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=52439 (He stole approx 400k USD)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=393593.0

PS: I would like to see Kludge & Blazedout419 in Default trust list.

A scammer is a scammer even if he stole $1 or $1,000,000 but when it comes to trusting people to do business with over here in this forum the trust system blatantly fails.

[Michail1]

THIS is the very reason why I dont support the 'Trust system' any random motherfudger can come & create a baseless accusation and the accused would have to spend days trying to repair his image or at least explain to every damn moron that believes the accusation.

This.

[legendster]

I can't vote.  It's a radio button instead of a check box, so it allows me to only vote for one person.  And, I am not on the list.

JK
Vote placed, but shouldn't it also be a lottery in that the voters win something.  Get paid to pick the right person?
Or, the voters have to donate 0.xyzBTC to place a vote.

JK Again.

You havent got a 55+ TS as seen from my end so you dont qualify.

You dont win anything here, neither do you lose anything. But you can see how 'wrong' the trust system really is.

[Muhammed Zakir]

THIS is the very reason why I dont support the 'Trust system' any random motherfudger can come & create a baseless accusation and the accused would have to spend days trying to repair his image or at least explain to every damn moron that believes the accusation.

This.

No baseless accusations has ever endure for long. IRL, you will have to do the same.

[legendster]

If I nominate myself, would I be bumped up from level 2 to level 1?

I know a few honest members here that I would add to level 2.  

You are a Forum Cop, and in a sense you and Tomatocage are the 'pioneer' of this forum policing. The very reason I started this mess here.

Which is good.

But now every other idiot is trying to follow your footsteps to get to that high level of trust on this forum. Which is what I have a problem with.

A typical wanna be Cage / Vod has lower number of trades than a serial trader here on this forum, I just dont get it why that should be the case. I am not saying that either you or cage or anyone that follows your footsteps are underserving of the trust you guys have earned but that just gives all of the new 'forum cops' a new 'short cut' to get to the top & do some major screw job.

[legendster]

THIS is the very reason why I dont support the 'Trust system' any random motherfudger can come & create a baseless accusation and the accused would have to spend days trying to repair his image or at least explain to every damn moron that believes the accusation.

This.

No baseless accusations has ever endure for long. IRL, you will have to do the same.

I have been accused of living in Dubai, selling stolen cars and scamming people off of their money by creating a loan request on BTCJAM for a long time now AND I'm still enduring it, I dont see it going away anytime soon.
But do any of those guys who accused me of all that crap ever GIVE A CRAP of wiping off those baseless slanders ? No.

Make no mistake those accusations have had no limiting effect on the transactions I have done on this forum but it just is a pain to see how EASILY a moron can turn my green trust into red / orange. Same goes with many other that have faced the same situation.

[Quickseller]

THIS is the very reason why I dont support the 'Trust system' any random motherfudger can come & create a baseless accusation and the accused would have to spend days trying to repair his image or at least explain to every damn moron that believes the accusation.

This.

No baseless accusations has ever endure for long. IRL, you will have to do the same.

This.

If someone were to make a baseless accusation then you will not be taken seriously. There are also no baseless accusations that have been made by people on default trust that I can think of off the top of my head (although there are several instances where negative trust was given for inappropriate reasons).

[legendster]

THIS is the very reason why I dont support the 'Trust system' any random motherfudger can come & create a baseless accusation and the accused would have to spend days trying to repair his image or at least explain to every damn moron that believes the accusation.

This.

No baseless accusations has ever endure for long. IRL, you will have to do the same.

This.

If someone were to make a baseless accusation then you will not be taken seriously. There are also no baseless accusations that have been made by people on default trust that I can think of off the top of my head (although there are several instances where negative trust was given for inappropriate reasons).

Forum Policing is the ultimate form of practicing 'baseless accusation' its like condemning a criminal even before he even thinks of committing a crime.
It just helps the meak minded to avoid *some scams in the short run while the real scammers device easy work around long cons to get what they want, in the mean while wanna be forum cops (like yourself) gain all the trust you need to potentially turn someone into a saint or a devil and guess what the sheep minded people here WILL take you seriously

This isnt personal.

[Quickseller]

THIS is the very reason why I dont support the 'Trust system' any random motherfudger can come & create a baseless accusation and the accused would have to spend days trying to repair his image or at least explain to every damn moron that believes the accusation.

This.

No baseless accusations has ever endure for long. IRL, you will have to do the same.

This.

If someone were to make a baseless accusation then you will not be taken seriously. There are also no baseless accusations that have been made by people on default trust that I can think of off the top of my head (although there are several instances where negative trust was given for inappropriate reasons).

Forum Policing is the ultimate form of practicing 'baseless accusation' its like condemning a criminal even before he even thinks of committing a crime.
It just helps the meak minded to avoid *some scams in the short run while the real scammers device easy work around long cons to get what they want, in the mean while wanna be forum cops (like yourself) gain all the trust you need to potentially turn someone into a saint or a devil and guess what the sheep minded people here WILL take you seriously

This isnt personal.

So you would rather be able to pull off a scam first and then receive negative trust so you cannot scam a second time?

The trust system is designed to prevent scams from happening in the first place.

Do you think a police officer would stand by and do nothing if they saw someone wearing a mask and holding a gun walk into a bank?