LIVE@C-CEX Polybit [POLY] • INVOICE USERS • FUTURE OF BUSINESS ON BLOCKCHAIN

[animalroam]

When I compile using make -f makefile.unix in the src folder, I get this:

Code:

make[1]: *** No rule to make target `libleveldb.a'.  Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/polybit/src/leveldb'
make: *** [leveldb/libleveldb.a] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
^Cmake: *** [obj/checkpoints.o] Interrupt
make: *** [obj/alert.o] Interrupt

If I go to src/leveldb and make clean libleveldb.a libmemenv.a, it gives me this error:

Code:

make: *** No rule to make target `clean'.  Stop.

Is there a fix for this?

[1715295984]

1715295984

[1715295984]

1715295984

[notsofast]

The fact that smarterhash was the only pool for the first few thousand blocks of this coin is kind of ruinous for proper distribution of a coin in its crucial early stages. Especially one like Polybit which has a very broad, generic use case and is thus almost impossible to pull off successfully. Though a poorly distributed ICO is almost as bad.

Buying into its small ICO was in retrospect the best play here. I still mined a small stack solo. At least the paywall pool made the mining dynamic into something I haven't yet seen and thus was mildly interesting, if probably poisonous for the coin's long-term prospects.

I don't like how the smarterhash discussion threadjacked the OP but hey I guess that's crypto for you.

I'm pretty sure I do better on my mining than any profit-switching multipool, paywall or otherwise, but I would point rigs to ipominer before paying to play at smarterhash.

Best of luck to Polybit dev team.

[BittrexCoin]

When I compile using make -f makefile.unix in the src folder, I get this:

Code:

make[1]: *** No rule to make target `libleveldb.a'.  Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/polybit/src/leveldb'
make: *** [leveldb/libleveldb.a] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
^Cmake: *** [obj/checkpoints.o] Interrupt
make: *** [obj/alert.o] Interrupt

If I go to src/leveldb and make clean libleveldb.a libmemenv.a, it gives me this error:

Code:

make: *** No rule to make target `clean'.  Stop.

Is there a fix for this?

copy - this file - libleveldb.a - from othe coin. and start compille again

[BanzaiBTC]

When I compile using make -f makefile.unix in the src folder, I get this:

Code:

make[1]: *** No rule to make target `libleveldb.a'.  Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/polybit/src/leveldb'
make: *** [leveldb/libleveldb.a] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
^Cmake: *** [obj/checkpoints.o] Interrupt
make: *** [obj/alert.o] Interrupt

If I go to src/leveldb and make clean libleveldb.a libmemenv.a, it gives me this error:

Code:

make: *** No rule to make target `clean'.  Stop.

Is there a fix for this?

First delete every " .O " file in the leveldb folder/subfolders
Delete libleveldb.a - libmemenv.a and build_config.mk

You also want to do a " chmod 777 build_detect_platform " in the leveldb folder just in case this file is a read only. (I was seriously stuck on this for 2 days.. That was a loooong time ago )

Then " make"  and you are done....

I hope this works for you


Edit: Looking at the github.. the Makefile is missing in the leveldb folder. I dont know if you really need this file though.. Normally there is a makefile in there... Try finding the makefile in another sourcecode... You can try any other scrypt based coin

[smarterhash]

The fact that smarterhash was the only pool for the first few thousand blocks of this coin is kind of ruinous for proper distribution of a coin in its crucial early stages. Especially one like Polybit which has a very broad, generic use case and is thus almost impossible to pull off successfully. Though a poorly distributed ICO is almost as bad.

Buying into its small ICO was in retrospect the best play here. I still mined a small stack solo. At least the paywall pool made the mining dynamic into something I haven't yet seen and thus was mildly interesting, if probably poisonous for the coin's long-term prospects.

I don't like how the smarterhash discussion threadjacked the OP but hey I guess that's crypto for you.

I'm pretty sure I do better on my mining than any profit-switching multipool, paywall or otherwise, but I would point rigs to ipominer before paying to play at smarterhash.

Best of luck to Polybit dev team.

SmarterHash is NOT a profit switching multi-pool. Smarterhash is a scrypt coin mining recommendation engine that also offers mining pools to our users. We have pools for 51 scrypt coins but YOU make the decisions of which coin to mine based on data from SmarterHash and SmarterHash can assist your decision making process by allowing you to create 'alerts' that measure over 10 different coin metrics, then allowing you to link an "alert'  to a 'mining strategy'  (that you create which allows you do assign specific or all workers to certain coin),  then through Smarterhash you can link Alerts to Mining Strategies that basically act as triggers to 'trigger' a mining strategy (switching all or selected workers to a selected coin) when a certain coin meet certain criteria established by you.

I am sure you cannot do better on your own than SmarterHash, simply because you do not have the time to perform all the calculations that SmarterHash does on nearly 60 scrypt coins every minutes including most recent price, block chain data, difficulty data, network hash rates, etc - plus we generate charts to help put the data into a visual graphical representation.

Simply trying to keep up to date on which coins pays the best "based on your hashing power" is more than a full time job and it's why I created SmarterHash - I got so frustrated with bad recommendations and all the time it took to gather good information then massage it down to something usable.







If  you have question,contact me : mikostawa@gmail.com

[notsofast]

The fact that smarterhash was the only pool for the first few thousand blocks of this coin is kind of ruinous for proper distribution of a coin in its crucial early stages. Especially one like Polybit which has a very broad, generic use case and is thus almost impossible to pull off successfully. Though a poorly distributed ICO is almost as bad.

Buying into its small ICO was in retrospect the best play here. I still mined a small stack solo. At least the paywall pool made the mining dynamic into something I haven't yet seen and thus was mildly interesting, if probably poisonous for the coin's long-term prospects.

I don't like how the smarterhash discussion threadjacked the OP but hey I guess that's crypto for you.

I'm pretty sure I do better on my mining than any profit-switching multipool, paywall or otherwise, but I would point rigs to ipominer before paying to play at smarterhash.

Best of luck to Polybit dev team.

SmarterHash is NOT a profit switching multi-pool. Smarterhash is a scrypt coin mining recommendation engine that also offers mining pools to our users. We have pools for 51 scrypt coins but YOU make the decisions of which coin to mine based on data from SmarterHash and SmarterHash can assist your decision making process by allowing you to create 'alerts' that measure over 10 different coin metrics, then allowing you to link an "alert'  to a 'mining strategy'  (that you create which allows you do assign specific or all workers to certain coin),  then through Smarterhash you can link Alerts to Mining Strategies that basically act as triggers to 'trigger' a mining strategy (switching all or selected workers to a selected coin) when a certain coin meet certain criteria established by you.

I am sure you cannot do better on your own than SmarterHash, simply because you do not have the time to perform all the calculations that SmarterHash does on nearly 60 scrypt coins every minutes including most recent price, block chain data, difficulty data, network hash rates, etc - plus we generate charts to help put the data into a visual graphical representation.

Simply trying to keep up to date on which coins pays the best "based on your hashing power" is more than a full time job and it's why I created SmarterHash - I got so frustrated with bad recommendations and all the time it took to gather good information then massage it down to something usable.

I can appreciate the work you put in, but this isn't the place to discuss your service-- point me to a smarterhash thread please?

[smarterhash]

what's the status of a block chain explorer and an exchange?

[spydud22]

what's the status of a block chain explorer and an exchange?

http://cryptobe.co.uk/chain/PolyBit

[Martijnvdc]

The private key for the escrow address has been handed over to the dev.
Polybit IPO coins are delivered.

[damm315er]

I can appreciate the work you put in, but this isn't the place to discuss your service-- point me to a smarterhash thread please?

Here's the Smarterhash thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=951607.  As repeatedly suggested, please try not to derail the POLY thread any more, by posting questions regarding Smarterhash in the thread started for it.

[smarterhash]

http://richlist.cryptobe.com/PolyBit

[polybit]

      https://i.imgur.com/bF8KslQ.png  

THX to MystPhysX; MAC QT now Available!

[damm315er]

Exchange?  Miners will quickly lose interest without one.

Cryptopia will list the coin for a million DOT coin.  Just need ANN thread, GIT, block explorer, and reason for existing.  You have all of those.

See the "voting" section.

[polybit]

Exchange?  Miners will quickly lose interest without one.

Cryptopia will list the coin for a million DOT coin.  Just need ANN thread, GIT, block explorer, and reason for existing.  You have all of those.

See the "voting" section.

We've just applied to Bleutrade to be listed. Applying to Cryptopia rn.

[animalroam]

Why does the daemon keep showing "no info about this transaction"? This isn't just for block 0; it's for a lot of blocks. Take block 4823's transaction:

Code:

./polybitd getrawtransaction "b3a2f44f0dc14fb72f229e62b550dbe77b7434ee8a62667b827fef04470775c0"
error: {"code":-5,"message":"No information available about transaction"}

If you do gettransaction on it:

Code:

error: {"code":-5,"message":"Invalid or non-wallet transaction id"}

[MystPhysX]

Why does the daemon keep showing "no info about this transaction"? This isn't just for block 0; it's for a lot of blocks. Take block 4823's transaction:

Code:

./polybitd getrawtransaction "b3a2f44f0dc14fb72f229e62b550dbe77b7434ee8a62667b827fef04470775c0"
error: {"code":-5,"message":"No information available about transaction"}

If you do gettransaction on it:

Code:

error: {"code":-5,"message":"Invalid or non-wallet transaction id"}

I believe gettransaction is only for in-wallet transactions.

getrawtransaction on the other will show transactions on the block chain but only if txindex is set to 1 (true).



Is anyone connected to more than one node? I would like a list please.

For reference I am connected to 108.61.103.195

[smarterhash]

root@pools:/# polybitd getpeerinfo
[
    {
        "addr" : "52.16.23.106:11095",
        "services" : "00000003",
        "lastsend" : 1435104463,
        "lastrecv" : 1435104463,
        "bytessent" : 1425104,
        "bytesrecv" : 899151,
        "blocksrequested" : 4084,
        "conntime" : 1434931306,
        "version" : 70002,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.6.2/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "startingheight" : 245,
        "banscore" : 0,
        "syncnode" : true
    },
    {
        "addr" : "134.249.144.169:11095",
        "services" : "00000003",
        "lastsend" : 1435104463,
        "lastrecv" : 1435104463,
        "bytessent" : 105106,
        "bytesrecv" : 116845,
        "blocksrequested" : 7,
        "conntime" : 1435090046,
        "version" : 70002,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.6.2/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "startingheight" : 5373,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "108.61.103.195:11095",
        "services" : "00000003",
        "lastsend" : 1435104463,
        "lastrecv" : 1435104463,
        "bytessent" : 6712,
        "bytesrecv" : 1375,
        "blocksrequested" : 5,
        "conntime" : 1435098548,
        "version" : 70002,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.6.2/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "startingheight" : 5395,
        "banscore" : 0
    }
]

[jamesjde]

Polybit,

Now that the coin is launched, how will you be implementing the Polyvoice and Polyblocks features?
Will these features be centralized, offered through web servers like with Counterparty's counterwallet?
Or will you be releasing them through a new desktop client?

Thank you

[animalroam]

Why does the daemon keep showing "no info about this transaction"? This isn't just for block 0; it's for a lot of blocks. Take block 4823's transaction:

Code:

./polybitd getrawtransaction "b3a2f44f0dc14fb72f229e62b550dbe77b7434ee8a62667b827fef04470775c0"
error: {"code":-5,"message":"No information available about transaction"}

If you do gettransaction on it:

Code:

error: {"code":-5,"message":"Invalid or non-wallet transaction id"}

I believe gettransaction is only for in-wallet transactions.

Gettransaction should be able to be used for all transactions no matter if it's in-wallet or out of wallet. Thanks for the reminder about -txindex; knew I was forgetting something .

[MystPhysX]

       "addr" : "52.16.23.106:11095",
        "addr" : "134.249.144.169:11095",
        "addr" : "108.61.103.195:11095",

Cheers.

Here are the nodes in a convenient format:

Code:

addnode 52.16.23.106:11095 add
addnode 134.249.144.169:11095 add
addnode 108.61.103.195:11095 add