..Who owns this wallet??

[egyproductions]

While i was on the blockchain homepage i randomly clicked on one of the recent transactions
it lead me to this wallet https://blockchain.info/address/1GX28yLjVWux7ws4UQ9FB4MnLH4UKTPK2z

Weird looking one... total received 50 million dollars..

The interesting part is the payments received though, there is some sort of pattern

Any idea who or what could own this wallet?

[1714820879]

1714820879

[H.W.Z]

While i was on the blockchain homepage i randomly clicked on one of the recent transactions
it lead me to this wallet https://blockchain.info/address/1GX28yLjVWux7ws4UQ9FB4MnLH4UKTPK2z

Weird looking one... total received 50 million dollars..

The interesting part is the payments received though, there is some sort of pattern

Any idea who or what could own this wallet?

I don't think anyone would know except the receivers and senders.

[coinableS]

I'm guessing that would have to be an exchange. One input with 700 BTC going to hundreds/thousands of other addresses, that isn't a normal transaction for an individual or small group. At first I thought it was FACTOM but the amounts are too large, so my best guess is it's an exchange wallet.

[AccountStore.biz]

It seems to be tainted with coins from Mt Gox. It could be some of the stolen BTC, though even if it is I doubt the current owner has any idea.

[afriezalie]

Maybe a trading wallet, or mixer wallet. We don't know who has that wallet except the sender. You can manipulate your total received if you send and receive again and again.

[ammy009]

I guess it's a cloud mining company .......

[JPage]

It seems to be tainted with coins from Mt Gox. It could be some of the stolen BTC, though even if it is I doubt the current owner has any idea.

There is no such thing as 'taint'. A bitcoin is a bitcoin.  No matter if it was just used to kill the president of Laos.  The notion that bitcoins get dirty and less good based upon their prior use - is completely silly.  When someone hands me a 100Euro note - I don't give a damn what nefarious transaction it was used for last week.  That 100 note looks the same amount of green to me. 

[kolloh]

My guess would also be an exchange with the number of different addresses those are going to.

[Xialla]

it seems, that it is jump address for this one: https://blockchain.info/address/1KFHE7w8BhaENAswwryaoccDb6qcT6DbYY which belongs to some big-ass chinese mine https://www.f2pool.com/

uhh those chinese guys..

[Jasmev]

I guess it belongs to pool. I've noticed few addresses linked with few members here.

[BIT-Sharon]

it seems, that it is jump address for this one: https://blockchain.info/address/1KFHE7w8BhaENAswwryaoccDb6qcT6DbYY which belongs to some big-ass chinese mine https://www.f2pool.com/

uhh those chinese guys..

yes, we should notice the warning, that this bitcoin address contains transactions which may be double spends. You should be extremely careful when trusting any transactions to or from this address.

[NorrisK]

it seems, that it is jump address for this one: https://blockchain.info/address/1KFHE7w8BhaENAswwryaoccDb6qcT6DbYY which belongs to some big-ass chinese mine https://www.f2pool.com/

uhh those chinese guys..

yes, we should notice the warning, that this bitcoin address contains transactions which may be double spends. You should be extremely careful when trusting any transactions to or from this address.

How can there be double spends on there after several conformations? I thought they would be wiped if they didn't get into the longest chain..

[thebenjamincode]

my guess is that the owner of that wallet can be a company like a bitcoin exchange or a mining company

[randy8777]

a huge pool or more likely an exchange. there are more wallets like this where there were so many receiced coins. nothing special.

[twats]

Mtgox's address.
You may check those addresses via https://www.walletexplorer.com/

[real789]

That a mining company you can ceck at here
https://blockchain.info/taint/1GX28yLjVWux7ws4UQ9FB4MnLH4UKTPK2z
50% total transaction from this address
https://blockchain.info/address/1KFHE7w8BhaENAswwryaoccDb6qcT6DbYY

and you can see that address use from mining bitcoin
example this Tx Id this is Solo mining reward
https://blockchain.info/tx/5d467c852462b2ae4bba3ad78d18219ddfae3c00252d547d6f8ee41475d29d1b

[Jeremycoin]

I see a lot thing like this, maybe even has a bigger amount of Bitcoin.
But, I don't really care about it

[egyproductions]

While i was on the blockchain homepage i randomly clicked on one of the recent transactions
it lead me to this wallet https://blockchain.info/address/1GX28yLjVWux7ws4UQ9FB4MnLH4UKTPK2z

Weird looking one... total received 50 million dollars..

The interesting part is the payments received though, there is some sort of pattern

Any idea who or what could own this wallet?

First , its an address, not a wallet.

Second, why the fuck does it matter who owns it?

You should go to your bank and ask them to show you their fund... if you have too much free time, idiot.

Yes im bored, i have nothing to do, so i come here and post s*** when im high.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1103916.new#new

[Quickseller]

walletexplorer.com says it is "MtGoxAndOthers" wallet :
https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/MtGoxAndOthers?from_address=1GX28yLjVWux7ws4UQ9FB4MnLH4UKTPK2z

It seems to be tainted with coins from Mt Gox. It could be some of the stolen BTC, though even if it is I doubt the current owner has any idea.

This is not true. The "wallet" MtGoxAndOthers on walletexplorer.com is essentially a catch all wallet for addresses that are linked together from coinjoin-like transactions. As more and more 'wallets' use coinjoin like services they will most likely be linked to that wallet.

Walletexplorer.com really should use some kind of filtering to attempt to exclude coinjoin-like transactions when spend linking addresses together.

The address appears to be likely either belonging to F2Pool, or a miner who mines on F2Pool, however IMO the chances are probably greater that it belongs to the former considering that many inputs that it spends are roughly 25 BTC (the likely block reward that f2pool receives from finding blocks) and that it spends the entire amount of inputs associated with the address (e.g. does not give change back to itself, and spends multiple inputs), yet it receives multiple transactions from what is likely f2pool, and appears to spend funds to a large number of addresses, likely to their miners.

[Gleb Gamow]

DiscusFish. No ifs, ands or buts about it.