Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 05:07:38 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: 63% of all the HIV infections in the United States occurs among the Sodomites  (Read 2497 times)
bryant.coleman (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 1217


View Profile
July 03, 2015, 03:49:36 PM
 #1

Is this natural selection?

Although gays form just 4% of the US population, they account for 63% of all the new HIV infections. Almost 90% of all the new cases are linked to gay / bisexual men, as more than 80% of the women newly identified with HIV were also infected by bisexual men.

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/statistics_basics_factsheet.pdf



So far in the United States, some 311,087 gays have died due to the HIV infection, since the first case was diagnosed in the 1980s. Out of the ~1,200,000 people currently living with HIV in the United States, some 624,000 are gay.

This means that a total of 935,000 HIV infections have occurred among the gays ever since 1980s, out of a total population of 12 million. That represents an incidence rate of 7.8% against the general prevalence rate of 0.4% and a prevalence of <0.1% among heterosexual men.
1714712858
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714712858

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714712858
Reply with quote  #2

1714712858
Report to moderator
1714712858
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714712858

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714712858
Reply with quote  #2

1714712858
Report to moderator
1714712858
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714712858

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714712858
Reply with quote  #2

1714712858
Report to moderator
No Gods or Kings. Only Bitcoin
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Sakarias-Corporation
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500


Call me Alice. just Alice.


View Profile WWW
July 03, 2015, 03:58:52 PM
 #2

the Only reason that Homosexual men gets ''easier'' infected is due to the fact that HIV has a HIGHER risk of spreading while preforming Anal Sex instead of Vaginal Sex....it has nothing to do with being Homosexual.......

bryant.coleman (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 1217


View Profile
July 03, 2015, 04:05:34 PM
 #3

the Only reason that Homosexual men gets ''easier'' infected is due to the fact that HIV has a HIGHER risk of spreading while preforming Anal Sex instead of Vaginal Sex....it has nothing to do with being Homosexual.......

I disagree with your argument. A majority of the heterosexual men (including myself) engage in anal sex (although with the opposite gender).  Grin But the big difference here is that heterosexual men will be having only one partner (very rarely more than that), while the homosexual men engage in sex with dozens or even hundreds of partners every year.

The reason why homosexuals are so frequently infected with HIV is due to the fact that they have multiple partners unlike the heterosexual men.
Sakarias-Corporation
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500


Call me Alice. just Alice.


View Profile WWW
July 03, 2015, 04:19:33 PM
 #4

the Only reason that Homosexual men gets ''easier'' infected is due to the fact that HIV has a HIGHER risk of spreading while preforming Anal Sex instead of Vaginal Sex....it has nothing to do with being Homosexual.......

I disagree with your argument. A majority of the heterosexual men (including myself) engage in anal sex (although with the opposite gender).  Grin But the big difference here is that heterosexual men will be having only one partner (very rarely more than that), while the homosexual men engage in sex with dozens or even hundreds of partners every year.

The reason why homosexuals are so frequently infected with HIV is due to the fact that they have multiple partners unlike the heterosexual men.

that's Bullshit. this is a typical statement made by those who can only get laid once or twice a year....

Homosexual and Heterosexual men sleep around equally much.

bryant.coleman (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 1217


View Profile
July 03, 2015, 04:36:42 PM
 #5

that's Bullshit. this is a typical statement made by those who can only get laid once or twice a year....

Homosexual and Heterosexual men sleep around equally much.

Would like to know your opinion about this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexualities:_A_Study_of_Diversity_Among_Men_and_Women

Quote
Bell and Weinberg reported evidence of widespread sexual compulsion among homosexual men. 83% of the homosexual men surveyed estimated they had had sex with 50 or more partners in their lifetime, 43% estimated they had sex with 500 or more partners; 28% with 1,000 or more partners.

Ever heard about a heterosexual with 1,000 partners?

And what about this?

Quote
There is an extremely low rate of sexual fidelity among homosexual men as compared to married heterosexuals.  Among married females 85% reported sexual fidelity. Among married men, 75.5% reported sexual fidelity. Among homosexual males in their current relationship, 4.5% reported sexual fidelity.

Source: Laumann, The Social Organization of Sexuality.

http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo3626005.html
saddampbuh
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1014


View Profile
July 03, 2015, 04:37:06 PM
 #6

homosexuality is death, this was known thousands of years ago and it is no less true today

sodomites love to spread their disease around. i watched a video where an aids ridden sodomite at a fag swingers party said he wanted to get fucked by 300 guys. there are even websites for infected men who want to share the different strains of hiv with each other.

Be radical, have principles, be absolute, be that which the bourgeoisie calls an extremist: give yourself without counting or calculating, don't accept what they call ‘the reality of life' and act in such a way that you won't be accepted by that kind of ‘life', never abandon the principle of struggle.
minifrij
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1267


In Memory of Zepher


View Profile WWW
July 03, 2015, 04:53:44 PM
 #7

Quote
Though influential, and sometimes seen as a classic work, many of its findings have become dated due to social changes since its publication.
(First paragraph, last sentence)
Notice the use of the word dated, implying that the information is incorrect in the current era. But yeah I'm sure that a book from 1979, a time where homosexuality was widespread considered a sin, is the most reliable source to your argument.

While I'm not going to dispute homosexuals having several partners, heterosexuals are no different.
Gervais
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 366
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 03, 2015, 05:27:25 PM
 #8

Do you really need to refer to homosexuals as sodomites? Only religious twats do that.

the Only reason that Homosexual men gets ''easier'' infected is due to the fact that HIV has a HIGHER risk of spreading while preforming Anal Sex instead of Vaginal Sex....it has nothing to do with being Homosexual.......

I disagree with your argument. A majority of the heterosexual men (including myself) engage in anal sex (although with the opposite gender). 

How much do you pay?  Cheesy I doubt you have much of a sex life or time for sex the amount of time you spend on this forum being bigoted. Most bigots are pretty sexually frustrated and hate the world thus take out their own insecurities and inferiorities out on minorities and immigrants etc.
bryant.coleman (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 1217


View Profile
July 03, 2015, 05:38:15 PM
 #9

Notice the use of the word dated, implying that the information is incorrect in the current era. But yeah I'm sure that a book from 1979, a time where homosexuality was widespread considered a sin, is the most reliable source to your argument.

While I'm not going to dispute homosexuals having several partners, heterosexuals are no different.

A study by Paul Van de Ven, Pamela Rodden, June Crawford and Susan Kippax, titled A Comparative Demographic and Sexual Profile of Older Homosexually Active Men, which was published in The Journal of Sex Research had very similar results. This study was conducted in 1997, when homosexuality was largely legal.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/3813477
celestio
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 04, 2015, 03:53:11 AM
 #10

The OP obviously doesn't have much experience with women. I know plenty of gay and straight males, and some of the straight males I know go home with a different girl every night. Also, the risk of spreading HIV is higher in anal sex than vaginal sex, so the studies done on that are largely meaningless. Then, there's the fact that biological women are not sexually attracted to the male form(but they are to the female), and that may be why women do not "put out" as much, at least to men.


"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime" - Satoshi Nakamoto, June 17, 2010
PenguinFire
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


That Darn Cat


View Profile
July 04, 2015, 04:01:49 AM
 #11

OMG.  Is someone really using the term "sodomite" in 2015?  I know most of the users here are not bigots but the few that are want to remind us they are constantly.  As for the topic, so what?  They know the risk and roll the dice.  When you have straight sex you are rolling the same dice.  I really don't know why you are so passionate about putting down gay folk.  My guess is either you are pretty low class citizen and it makes you feel better or you secretly love the D and are butt hurt (no pun intended  Cheesy) you're god would hate on you for wanting that big, juicy D in your mouth.

bryant.coleman (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 1217


View Profile
July 04, 2015, 04:03:05 AM
 #12

Then, there's the fact that biological women are not sexually attracted to the male form

This is the latest propaganda item from the LGBT lobby. According to them all the women are Lesbians and they have no interest in sex with the males. All these arguments are based upon a flawed research study conducted by Dr. Meredith Chivers, herself a vocal advocate of the LGBT lobby. It has been rejected by most of the other reliable sources.

http://jezebel.com/5015942/are-all-women-a-little-bi-in-a-word-no
Okurkabinladin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 506



View Profile
July 04, 2015, 11:47:59 AM
 #13

the Only reason that Homosexual men gets ''easier'' infected is due to the fact that HIV has a HIGHER risk of spreading while preforming Anal Sex instead of Vaginal Sex....it has nothing to do with being Homosexual.......

Well, it may have something to do with the fact, that gays dont have vaginas, dont you think so?  Wink Also the fact, that homosexual community is promiscous doesnt exactly help.

It can be seen as natural selection. Sure.
Sithara007
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3192
Merit: 1344


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile
July 04, 2015, 11:53:38 AM
 #14

The OP obviously doesn't have much experience with women. I know plenty of gay and straight males, and some of the straight males I know go home with a different girl every night.

The OP was probably comparing married heterosexual couple to married homosexual couple. It is quite rare to find multiple sexual partners among the married heterosexual couples. However, for the married homosexual couples, it has been the norm.

..Stake.com..   ▄████████████████████████████████████▄
   ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄            ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██  ▄████▄
   ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██  ██████
   ██ ██████████ ██      ██ ██████████ ██   ▀██▀
   ██ ██      ██ ██████  ██ ██      ██ ██    ██
   ██ ██████  ██ █████  ███ ██████  ██ ████▄ ██
   ██ █████  ███ ████  ████ █████  ███ ████████
   ██ ████  ████ ██████████ ████  ████ ████▀
   ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██
   ██            ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀            ██ 
   ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀
  ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███  ██  ██  ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
 ██████████████████████████████████████████
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
█  ▄▀▄             █▀▀█▀▄▄
█  █▀█             █  ▐  ▐▌
█       ▄██▄       █  ▌  █
█     ▄██████▄     █  ▌ ▐▌
█    ██████████    █ ▐  █
█   ▐██████████▌   █ ▐ ▐▌
█    ▀▀██████▀▀    █ ▌ █
█     ▄▄▄██▄▄▄     █ ▌▐▌
█                  █▐ █
█                  █▐▐▌
█                  █▐█
▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█
▄▄█████████▄▄
▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄
▄█▀       ▐█▌       ▀█▄
██         ▐█▌         ██
████▄     ▄█████▄     ▄████
████████▄███████████▄████████
███▀    █████████████    ▀███
██       ███████████       ██
▀█▄       █████████       ▄█▀
▀█▄    ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄  ▄▄▄█▀
▀███████         ███████▀
▀█████▄       ▄█████▀
▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀
..PLAY NOW..





AVATAR & PERSONAL TEXT



Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform




Feel free to drop your doubts bellow
Report to moderator 
♠ ♥ ♣ ♦       ▬▬▬ ▬          Stake.com     /     Play Smarter          ▬ ▬▬▬       ♠ ♥ ♣ ♦
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
L E A D I N G   C R Y P T O  C A S I N O   &   S P O R T S   B E T T I N G
 
 Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Strongkored
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1061




View Profile Personal Message (Online)
Trust: +0 / =0 / -0
Ignore
   
Re: [OPEN]Stake.com NEW SIGNATURE CAMPAIGN l NEW PAYRATES l HERO & LEG ONLY
May 31, 2022, 08:28:59 AM
Reply with quote  +Merit  #2
Bitcointalk Username: strongkored
Profile Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=640554
Post Count: 5040
Forum Rank: Legendary
Are you able to wear our Signature, Avatar & Personal Text? will wear upon receipt
Stake
bryant.coleman (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 1217


View Profile
July 04, 2015, 12:04:07 PM
 #15

It can be seen as natural selection. Sure.

This is natural selection.

According to various studies, somewhere from 1% to 4% of the American population is LGBT. According to the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS, July 2014), 1.6 percent of Americans identify as gay or lesbian, and 0.7 percent considered themselves bisexual.

That amounts to a total of 2.3%. That means that out of the 242,542,967 adults, some 2.3% or 5,578,488 are gay. Of them 1 million are infected with HIV.

This means that 16.76% of all the LGBT are infected. It seems that HIV infection rate is lower among the lesbians, when compared to the gays. So my guess is that 3.5% of the Lesbians are infected by HIV, while some 30% of the gays are infected by the same virus.
Lethn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
July 04, 2015, 12:04:52 PM
 #16

You're still pissed off about gay marriage being legalised aren't you? Cheesy
Wilikon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
July 04, 2015, 02:40:06 PM
 #17

the Only reason that Homosexual men gets ''easier'' infected is due to the fact that HIV has a HIGHER risk of spreading while preforming Anal Sex instead of Vaginal Sex....it has nothing to do with being Homosexual.......

I disagree with your argument. A majority of the heterosexual men (including myself) engage in anal sex (although with the opposite gender).  Grin But the big difference here is that heterosexual men will be having only one partner (very rarely more than that), while the homosexual men engage in sex with dozens or even hundreds of partners every year.

The reason why homosexuals are so frequently infected with HIV is due to the fact that they have multiple partners unlike the heterosexual men.

that's Bullshit. this is a typical statement made by those who can only get laid once or twice a year....

Homosexual and Heterosexual men sleep around equally much.


Have you ever been to alphabet city (east village) during Halloween? I have.
What I saw was around mid 2000. One dude sitting in a restaurant, another one passing by on the sidewalk. They did not know each other. The dude at the restaurant was eating with a friend. He called the dude passing by. He turned and they started to talk. He started a deep examination the dude's penis on the sidewalk 2 min after starting talking. In full view of everyone walking by, children, etc.  Shocked I saw mothers hiding the eyes of their kids.

My first thought was 'no wonder aids killed so many of them in the 80's. not even a "Hello! What's your name?"
My second thought was about what I used to believe, that it was unfair to keep gays from giving their blood. I do not give my blood. They do. Why should anyone refuse their blood? Obviously I was not a doctor...

I am not saying and believe the whole gay community behaves like that today. I could also blame it on the naughty nature of Halloween night that evening...

You got smarter and safer. Good for you and good for everyone else.


Also there is no need to believe my story if you need to defend your totem no matter what.

 Smiley

bryant.coleman (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 1217


View Profile
July 04, 2015, 03:26:44 PM
 #18

Have you ever been to alphabet city (east village) during Halloween? I have.
What I saw was around mid 2000. One dude sitting in a restaurant, another one passing by on the sidewalk. They did not know each other. The dude at the restaurant was eating with a friend. He called the dude passing by. He turned and they started to talk. He started a deep examination the dude's penis on the sidewalk 2 min after starting talking. In full view of everyone walking by, children, etc.  Shocked I saw mothers hiding the eyes of their kids.

Definitely not an isolated incident. And the problem is that they want to do perversities like this in the open, especially in front of little children.  These idiots think that doing so can get them more recruits from the children.

My second thought was about what I used to believe, that it was unfair to keep gays from giving their blood. I do not give my blood. They do. Why should anyone refuse their blood? Obviously I was not a doctor...

For most of the 80s, HIV-AIDS was confined to the faggot community. Fags were dying like flies, and no one was giving any importance to it. Then the fags developed a plan. They participated in mass blood donations, knowingly infecting large numbers of innocent people. This is how HIV was introduced in to the general population.
michietn94
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1001



View Profile
July 04, 2015, 03:36:32 PM
 #19

I'm really wondering why there were Homosexual , lesbian, etc...
I mean why these have to exist ? We are actually built as Yin and Yang , girl and boy, complement each other.

Well about the OP, I'm understand because homosexual is really really disgusting  Angry and they are deserve for it

..
FANSUNITE

█ █
███
███
███
 ▄
 ▀
███
███
███
███
█ █

█ █
███
███
███
 ▄
 ▀
███
███
███
███
█ █
celestio
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 04, 2015, 03:50:12 PM
 #20

Then, there's the fact that biological women are not sexually attracted to the male form

This is the latest propaganda item from the LGBT lobby. According to them all the women are Lesbians and they have no interest in sex with the males. All these arguments are based upon a flawed research study conducted by Dr. Meredith Chivers, herself a vocal advocate of the LGBT lobby. It has been rejected by most of the other reliable sources.

http://jezebel.com/5015942/are-all-women-a-little-bi-in-a-word-no

You know what that article on jezebel says? It talks about romantic attraction, not sexual. Sexual attraction defines you sexuality no matter how you look at it, and every single study done on female sexuality shows there there is No such thing as a straight woman. Want to test it yourself? Get your mother, daughter, aunt, whatever, to go to sexologist and have their arousal "rate" taken while watching lesbian porn. Wake up and smell the coffee body, because over 50% of people on this earth are Bisexual. Dr Meredith Chivers identifies as a "straight woman" romantically, she has a husband. So stop lying please, you seem all the more childish and pathetic. In fact, did I type correcty? Every single study done on female arousal since the Kinsey era in the 1960s shows that all biological women are bisexual. Not just Dr Chivers, every one. Take a quick google or read a few books, it'll help you.

The studies don't show women are lesbians, they show that women are not sexually attracted to males physically, but they are very sexually attracted to other women physically. This means on a sexual level, they are bisexual.

All those religions that talk against homosexuality are wrong, or has a evil god who seeks to suppress the true sexuality of females, and that's been confirmed by science.

I have no idea about the people that supporting gay marriage. It's right if they said gay never harm people, but it sounds not right to me. I think some people support gay marriage because the gay people can get their right to get married each other. So it doesn't be matter if the gays are a strangers. Then, what would you do if one of your family, son maybe, is a gay? Only retarded parent that don't get shock and support him immediately after hear it.

Oh is that the case? You're in for quite a shock then because your siser, wife, daughter, aunt, mother, grandmoher, that random girl at work, etc, are all Bisexual. More than half the people on this planet aren't straight, and it's due to human biology. Sexual arousal is different from romantic attraction, and people generally tend to define their sexuality due to their romantic attractions, and it's simply wrong. Sexual arousal/attraction is the main identifying factor of one's sexuality, and they are vastly different between men and women.

Your bible is wrong, your koran is wrong, your torah is wrong. If they were right, then your god treats women unfairly for supposedly making it impossible for them to be relatively straight, sexually. The whole world needs to wake up and learn these things, then discrimination/homophobia and such on the basis of sexuality would itself be as taboo as say a neo-nazi.


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/12/fashion/12bisex.html?pagewanted=all
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/magazine/25desire-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/16/books/review/what-do-women-want-by-daniel-bergner.html
http://www.livescience.com/37834-women-sexuality-and-alloparenting.html -
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2051284/More-half-women-bi-curious-attracted-women.html -

"Heterosexual women, Dr. Chivers and her colleagues found, were no more excited by athletic naked men doing yoga or tossing stones into the ocean than they were by the control footage: long pans of the snowcapped Himalayas. When straight women viewed a video of a naked woman doing calisthenics, on the other hand, their blood flow increased significantly."

"Dr. Chivers’s work adds to a growing body of scientific evidence that places female sexuality along a continuum between heterosexuality and homosexuality, rather than as an either-or phenomenon."

"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime" - Satoshi Nakamoto, June 17, 2010
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!