Re: [AXIOM] AxiomMemHash, Schnorr Sigs Implemented, APOS 3.0, AXH 2.0 Proposed

[bitspill]

Code:

error: variable-sized object may not be initialized
     uint32_t M[N] = { 0 };

Oh, perhaps you have to replace the N with 65536 so the compiler knows it's a constant and if you don't have uint256 available and must use uint32_t then it will require other changes which I don't know off hand... I'll try looking in a bit.

Edit: I believe the alternative is to compile with C99 then you can keep it as M[N]

[1715397841]

1715397841

[1715397841]

1715397841

[1715397841]

1715397841

[1715397841]

1715397841

[1715397841]

1715397841

[ocminer]

Code:

error: variable-sized object may not be initialized
     uint32_t M[N] = { 0 };

Oh, perhaps you have to replace the N with 65536 so the compiler knows it's a constant and if you don't have uint256 available and must use uint32_t then it will require other changes which I don't know off hand... I'll try looking in a bit.

Edit: I believe the alternative is to compile with C99 then you can keep it as M[N]

Thanks for your help, from my experience I always fail at C++ to C conversions, so I'll just leave it here, there are a lot of other guys here very capable of writing a CPU miner within a few minutes for this algo, I'll just wait for them - pool is ready

[CryptRadio]

https://bitbucket.org/AxiomCryptocurrency/axiom/commits/ce3bc99bb67ed60c0dd0431a8d7040d5d70a6d86?at=master

Nethash bug fixed! New windows wallet:

https://mega.co.nz/#!0EVlWJhK!kThu21dFCJe6vT63RJksdkds_L53Z_pphoj1ligCS3o

Worked like a charm! Thanks dev  

[djm34]

Code:

error: variable-sized object may not be initialized
     uint32_t M[N] = { 0 };

Oh, perhaps you have to replace the N with 65536 so the compiler knows it's a constant and if you don't have uint256 available and must use uint32_t then it will require other changes which I don't know off hand... I'll try looking in a bit.

Edit: I believe the alternative is to compile with C99 then you can keep it as M[N]

Thanks for your help, from my experience I always fail at C++ to C conversions, so I'll just leave it here, there are a lot of other guys here very capable of writing a CPU miner within a few minutes for this algo, I'll just wait for them - pool is ready

65536*8...
uint32_t M[524288]={0}

stupid algo... actually it is more or less pluck algo with shabal instead of sha256

hmm btw     int p = (b - 1 + N) % N; <=> int p = b-1 lol

[AxiomCryptocurrency]

http://www.greeneducationcenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/20130726-081255.jpg

[djm34]

sleep well while the botnet are working

[AxiomCryptocurrency]

http://www.greeneducationcenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/20130726-081255.jpg

sleep well while the botnet are working

We have over 400 connections to the nodes, many miners are participating. Come join us, brother!

[xtrembash]

i give up  
unfair launch !!

instamine 500 first block and then gives good nodes to mine  
&  there is already a block halves  200axh per block atm instead of 500 and then 100axh per block in few hours lol

 private instamine + fast block reward halves
well done

nice unfair launch

[bitspill]

hmm btw     int p = (b - 1 + N) % N; <=> int p = b-1 lol

Not quite. What happens when b = 0?

[jc12345]

i give up  
unfair launch !!

instamine 500 first block and then gives good nodes to mine  
&  there is already a block halves  200axh per block atm instead of 500

 private instamine + fast block reward halves
well done

nice unfair launch

I think you are a bit harsh. Like any coin launch people that were setup quickly got blocks. CPU mining can be a biatch sometimes and you gotta work for your coins. Everything is not always just point and click mining.

[go6ooo1212]

Does someone finding blocks , now. I see the diff isn't high , but not any success with my E3-1225 Xeon ...

[Historical]

Does someone finding blocks , now. I see the diff isn't high , but not any success with my E3-1225 Xeon ...

Yes4
3 blocks with E5 Xeon, 1 block with E3...

[jc12345]

Does someone finding blocks , now. I see the diff isn't high , but not any success with my E3-1225 Xeon ...

You are probably doing something wrong.

[xtrembash]

i give up  
unfair launch !!

instamine 500 first block and then gives good nodes to mine  
&  there is already a block halves  200axh per block atm instead of 500

 private instamine + fast block reward halves
well done

nice unfair launch

I think you are a bit harsh. Like any coin launch people that were setup quickly got blocks. CPU mining can be a biatch sometimes and you gotta work for your coins. Everything is not always just point and click mining.

i was since the beggining but blockchain fail fork during the first 500 block @500axh per block
and then he gives nodes and it was ok ...
so only dev and dev's friend who had good nodes were able to solomine correctly the 500's blocks
SIMPLE of that
and then...
fast HALVES  
50 BlockReward coming fast btw
lol

[go6ooo1212]

Does someone finding blocks , now. I see the diff isn't high , but not any success with my E3-1225 Xeon ...

You are probably doing something wrong.

I've just synced the wallet , and engaged the mining button in it , is that wrong ?

[jc12345]

Does someone finding blocks , now. I see the diff isn't high , but not any success with my E3-1225 Xeon ...

You are probably doing something wrong.

I've just synced the wallet , and engaged the mining button in it , is that wrong ?

You can also try adding gen=1 in your .conf.

[jc12345]

i give up  
unfair launch !!

instamine 500 first block and then gives good nodes to mine  
&  there is already a block halves  200axh per block atm instead of 500

 private instamine + fast block reward halves
well done

nice unfair launch

I think you are a bit harsh. Like any coin launch people that were setup quickly got blocks. CPU mining can be a biatch sometimes and you gotta work for your coins. Everything is not always just point and click mining.

i was since the beggining but blockchain fail fork during the first 500 block @500axh per block
and then he gives nodes and it was ok ...
so only dev and dev's friend who had good nodes were able to solomine correctly the 500's blocks
SIMPLE of that
and then...
fast HALVES  
50 block reward coming fast btw
lol

I used the same nodes from the beginning with no new ones added. It forked when diff was low and tons of blocks were "solved". Once dif got higher forks stopped.

[xtrembash]

i give up  
unfair launch !!

instamine 500 first block and then gives good nodes to mine  
&  there is already a block halves  200axh per block atm instead of 500

 private instamine + fast block reward halves
well done

nice unfair launch

I think you are a bit harsh. Like any coin launch people that were setup quickly got blocks. CPU mining can be a biatch sometimes and you gotta work for your coins. Everything is not always just point and click mining.

i was since the beggining but blockchain fail fork during the first 500 block @500axh per block
and then he gives nodes and it was ok ...
so only dev and dev's friend who had good nodes were able to solomine correctly the 500's blocks
SIMPLE of that
and then...
fast HALVES  
50 block reward coming fast btw
lol

I used the same nodes from the beginning with no new ones added. It forked when diff was low and tons of blocks were "solved". Once dif got higher forks stopped.

hahaha
and who have "the tons of block" ?
who ?
lmao

[jc12345]

i give up  
unfair launch !!

instamine 500 first block and then gives good nodes to mine  
&  there is already a block halves  200axh per block atm instead of 500

 private instamine + fast block reward halves
well done

nice unfair launch

I think you are a bit harsh. Like any coin launch people that were setup quickly got blocks. CPU mining can be a biatch sometimes and you gotta work for your coins. Everything is not always just point and click mining.

i was since the beggining but blockchain fail fork during the first 500 block @500axh per block
and then he gives nodes and it was ok ...
so only dev and dev's friend who had good nodes were able to solomine correctly the 500's blocks
SIMPLE of that
and then...
fast HALVES  
50 block reward coming fast btw
lol

I used the same nodes from the beginning with no new ones added. It forked when diff was low and tons of blocks were "solved". Once dif got higher forks stopped.

hahaha
and who have "the tons of block" ?
who ?
lmao

Let me rephrase. Tons were "found" but orphaned. Normal for a launch at low diff. THat is why it is in inverted commas. Once diff oges up things stabalize.

[go6ooo1212]

gen=1 doesn't work as well. I think additional miner is needed obviously ...