ianbakewell (OP)
|
|
September 28, 2012, 04:23:06 PM |
|
I just noticed this thread in the mining section: Crossposting for awareness and further discussion.
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
September 28, 2012, 04:32:21 PM |
|
if it were an attack why would they have contacted the devs ahead of time?
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
September 28, 2012, 05:12:38 PM |
|
It is a university, so I figured they were not hostile. Did not see any mention of contact with the devs. Still, 10% of the network is a hell of a lot to just "turn on" suddenly Wonder how much more they have up the sleeve. this is actually old news from a few weeks back when they published the paper. at that time, they said they had contacted the devs. what is new is that they've actually demonstrated, with evidence, their theory in action.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
September 28, 2012, 05:16:46 PM |
|
Zurich? Is it where a lot of bankers live?
|
|
|
|
lakeluke
Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
|
September 28, 2012, 05:35:33 PM |
|
Can someone pls post a link to their paper; thanks
|
|
|
|
Ivica
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 218
Merit: 100
Firstbits: 19e3fc
|
|
September 28, 2012, 05:37:48 PM |
|
Can someone pls post a link to their paper; thanks
This one http://eprint.iacr.org/2012/248 ?
|
|
|
|
Stephen Gornick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1010
|
|
September 28, 2012, 06:03:04 PM |
|
what is new is that they've actually demonstrated, with evidence, their theory in action.
Well, new back in May when their results were first shared. This is for the race attack (on 0/unconfirmed transctions), and not a 51% attack which could reverse confirmed transactions. - http://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Double-spendingThey describe how they could connect to their "test vendor", which means that vendor's node wasn't configured according to the recommendations (i.e., no incoming connections, explicitly connect outgoing to hub nodes): - http://blockchain.info/hub-nodes
|
|
|
|
Dansker
|
|
September 28, 2012, 07:50:25 PM |
|
About time a university started researching Bitcoin seriously.
Stress testing the network and protocol by a neutral party is something we should be grateful for, regardless of the immediate consequences.
If they can disrupt the network, so can others. And then I prefer this uni to do it, so we can learn from it rather than die from it.
|
|
|
|
Severian
|
|
September 28, 2012, 07:57:35 PM |
|
Stress testing the network and protocol by a neutral party is something we should be grateful for, regardless of the immediate consequences. Well said. Just quoting you for reinforcement.
|
|
|
|
Cdecker
|
|
September 28, 2012, 08:00:04 PM |
|
Well I was wondering how long it would take for people to notice. It's me And no I am not putting lots of hashing power to the network, notice that it just says "relayed by" and not "mined by". I'm performing some measurements, paper is due in a few weeks.
|
|
|
|
Gyrsur
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
|
|
September 28, 2012, 08:02:27 PM |
|
About time a university started researching Bitcoin seriously.
Stress testing the network and protocol by a neutral party is something we should be grateful for, regardless of the immediate consequences.
If they can disrupt the network, so can others. And then I prefer this uni to do it, so we can learn from it rather than die from it.
the whole mining process has to be inspected. all the involved parties which producing no really value have to be sorted out!
|
|
|
|
allthingsluxury
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1029
|
|
September 28, 2012, 08:02:44 PM |
|
Will be interesting to see how this all unfolds.
|
Gold & Silver Financial News: Silver Liberation Army, Gold & Silver News, Geopolitical & Financial News, Jim Rickards Blog, Marc Faber Blog, Jim Rogers Blog, Peter Schiff Blog, David Morgan Blog, James Turk Blog, Eric Sprott Blog, Gerald Celente Blog
|
|
|
Dansker
|
|
September 28, 2012, 08:05:18 PM |
|
Well I was wondering how long it would take for people to notice. It's me And no I am not putting lots of hashing power to the network, notice that it just says "relayed by" and not "mined by". I'm performing some measurements, paper is due in a few weeks. Can you somehow prove this is you doing this? Also, what you are doing, care to "explain it like I'm 5"?
|
|
|
|
Gyrsur
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
|
|
September 28, 2012, 08:05:24 PM |
|
Well I was wondering how long it would take for people to notice. It's me And no I am not putting lots of hashing power to the network, notice that it just says "relayed by" and not "mined by". I'm performing some measurements, paper is due in a few weeks. thank you! due your work I came under attack of some moderators and some pool operators (which I really like!)
|
|
|
|
Cdecker
|
|
September 28, 2012, 08:11:18 PM |
|
Well I was wondering how long it would take for people to notice. It's me And no I am not putting lots of hashing power to the network, notice that it just says "relayed by" and not "mined by". I'm performing some measurements, paper is due in a few weeks. thank you! due your work I came under attack of some moderators and some pool operators (which I really like!) Hm? What do you mean? I can't give you the exact details of what I'm doing until it gets published. I can tell you that I participate in the network as any other node does, I'm just a very big node (5'000 connections open), and am thus considered a Hub in Blockchain.info's vocabulary
|
|
|
|
Akka
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
|
|
September 28, 2012, 08:12:54 PM |
|
Well I was wondering how long it would take for people to notice. It's me And no I am not putting lots of hashing power to the network, notice that it just says "relayed by" and not "mined by". I'm performing some measurements, paper is due in a few weeks. Can you somehow prove this is you doing this? Also, what you are doing, care to "explain it like I'm 5"? Its really him: http://www.disco.ethz.ch/members/cdecker.html
|
All previous versions of currency will no longer be supported as of this update
|
|
|
Cdecker
|
|
September 28, 2012, 08:16:35 PM |
|
I'm not the only one working with such large nodes btw. There seems to be someone from the university of Munich that is doing something similar: I wonder what they are doing :-)
|
|
|
|
Gyrsur
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
|
|
September 28, 2012, 08:19:04 PM |
|
Well I was wondering how long it would take for people to notice. It's me And no I am not putting lots of hashing power to the network, notice that it just says "relayed by" and not "mined by". I'm performing some measurements, paper is due in a few weeks. thank you! due your work I came under attack of some moderators and some pool operators (which I really like!) Hm? What do you mean? I can't give you the exact details of what I'm doing until it gets published. I can tell you that I participate in the network as any other node does, I'm just a very big node (5'000 connections open), and am thus considered a Hub in Blockchain.info's vocabulary please read this here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=113654.0
|
|
|
|
elux
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1458
Merit: 1006
|
|
September 28, 2012, 08:21:27 PM Last edit: September 28, 2012, 08:32:51 PM by elux |
|
Well I was wondering how long it would take for people to notice. It's me And no I am not putting lots of hashing power to the network, notice that it just says "relayed by" and not "mined by". I'm performing some measurements, paper is due in a few weeks.
Cool. Well, today I learned a bunch of arcana about relaying versus mining blocks. What, exactly, are you measuring? How many people are grappling with Bitcoin at ETH Zürich? thank you! due your work I came under attack of some moderators and some pool operators (which I really like!)
Well that's a weird way to look at it. They happened to be right, and we happened to be wrong. There is not much honor in being a fool, but there can be some merit in admitting the mistake. Now, what we should do is learn from the experience, and only then feel good about ourselves.
|
|
|
|
Cdecker
|
|
September 28, 2012, 08:23:21 PM |
|
Sorry about that mate. The Paper is from another group (System Security) in the University, I'm in Distributed Computing. As far as I can tell we don't have any relevant computational power working on Bitcoin, I'm just relaying the blocks faster than others in the network.
|
|
|
|
|