hamdi (OP)
|
|
October 01, 2012, 04:40:01 PM |
|
i love oldschool html websites, that easily render even on old hardware.
nothing worse than a cluttered css monster with lots of ajax.
who else thinks the same?
|
|
|
|
rexcoin
|
|
October 01, 2012, 04:48:43 PM |
|
I dont hate it. But i do understand your point, i like old computers/pda/phones ect. Because to me they are built to last way longer then these new cheap part crap computers/tablets/phones - i have some crazy gadgets that i can install linux and stuff, but there is no point because it has so low ram and even sites will make it slow as hack.
But thats technology for us, since its evolving and spreading more then the black death in Europe - so now technology business owners just make new tablets/netbook just to make some money and people who buy it have to ether throw it out or sell for 1/10 the price so they can upgrade there machines and the process starts all over again 3 months later :-/
|
|
|
|
chmod755
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1021
|
|
October 01, 2012, 04:52:43 PM |
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2 Final//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <TITLE>Re: Web 2.0</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY BGCOLOR=#000000> <TABLE> <TR><TD><IMG SRC=REPLY.GIF></TD></TR><TD> <H1><FONT COLOR=#FFFF00 SIZE=72>Re: Web 2.0</H1></FONT></TABLE> </TABLE> <TABLE COLOR=#000000 WIDTH=100%> <TR> <TD COLSPAN=3> </P><FONT COLOR=#FF0000>rexcoin said:</FONT><BR> <FONT COLOR=#FFFFFF><I>I dont hate it. But i do understand your point, i like old computers/pda/phones ect. Because to me they are built to last way longer then these new cheap part crap computers/tablets/phones - i have some crazy gadgets that i can install linux and stuff, but there is no point because it has so low ram and even sites will make it slow as hack.
But thats technology for us, since its evolving and spreading more then the black death in Europe - so now technology business owners just make new tablets/netbook just to make some money and people who buy it have to ether throw it out or sell for 1/10 the price so they can upgrade there machines and the process starts all over again 3 months later :-/ </I> </P> <P>I also don't hate it, but I don't like the memory usage and javascript, flash, etc making it difficult to watch websites on old devices or in text-based browsers like w3m and lynx</P></FONT> </TD> </TR> </TABLE> </BODY> </HTML>
|
|
|
|
greyhawk
|
|
October 01, 2012, 07:55:27 PM |
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2 Final//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <TITLE>Re: Web 2.0</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY BGCOLOR=#000000> <TABLE> <TR><TD><IMG SRC=REPLY.GIF></TD></TR><TD> <H1><FONT COLOR=#FFFF00 SIZE=72>Re: Web 2.0</H1></FONT></TABLE> </TABLE> <TABLE COLOR=#000000 WIDTH=100%> <TR> <TD COLSPAN=3> </P><FONT COLOR=#FF0000>rexcoin said:</FONT><BR> <FONT COLOR=#FFFFFF><I>I dont hate it. But i do understand your point, i like old computers/pda/phones ect. Because to me they are built to last way longer then these new cheap part crap computers/tablets/phones - i have some crazy gadgets that i can install linux and stuff, but there is no point because it has so low ram and even sites will make it slow as hack.
But thats technology for us, since its evolving and spreading more then the black death in Europe - so now technology business owners just make new tablets/netbook just to make some money and people who buy it have to ether throw it out or sell for 1/10 the price so they can upgrade there machines and the process starts all over again 3 months later :-/ </I> </P> <P>I also don't hate it, but I don't like the memory usage and javascript, flash, etc making it difficult to watch websites on old devices or in text-based browsers like w3m and lynx</P></FONT> </TD> </TR> </TABLE> </BODY> </HTML>
Line 6, Column 15: an attribute value must be a literal unless it contains only name characters Line 8, Column 41: document type does not allow element "TD" here; assuming missing "TR" start-tag Line 9, Column 17: an attribute value must be a literal unless it contains only name characters Line 9, Column 48: end tag for "FONT" omitted, but its declaration does not permit this Line 9, Column 55: end tag for element "FONT" which is not open Line 10, Column 8: end tag for element "TABLE" which is not open Line 11, Column 14: there is no attribute "COLOR" Line 11, Column 14: an attribute value must be a literal unless it contains only name characters Line 11, Column 31: an attribute value must be a literal unless it contains only name characters Line 14, Column 4: end tag for element "P" which is not open Line 14, Column 17: an attribute value must be a literal unless it contains only name characters Line 15, Column 13: an attribute value must be a literal unless it contains only name characters Line 20, Column 4: end tag for element "P" which is not open Line 21, Column 3: document type does not allow element "P" here
|
|
|
|
ElectricMucus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
|
|
October 01, 2012, 08:06:57 PM |
|
It's just general SGML/XML bloat. HTML5 is supposed to get around this issue and for a while it will be fine until something else comes a long and there is another, partly incompatible format.
Interestingly the trend goes in the direction that html is just a container for javascript and the rest is handled via json/websockets.
|
|
|
|
caffeinewriter
|
|
October 01, 2012, 08:15:25 PM |
|
I don't hate Web 2.0, I hate those who abuse it until it looks like the Vegas strip of programming. When people understand that they can have a smooth, fully interactive site without having a modal window fly up and across every five seconds and a dancing advertisement next to the text, Web 2.0 is very welcoming. Otherwise you end up with something like this. (I dub thee: Japanese Tentacle Animated GIF Eye Rape) Or this. (Warning: May cause seizures, sudden explosive bowel movements, temporary blindness, permanent blindness, urges to throw computer out of nearest window, more seizures, stomach cramps, coma, death, reincarnation then another painful death, apocalyptic tendencies) I understand this site isn't Web 2.0, but I'm too lazy to find a truly terrible Web 2.0 site.
|
|
|
|
hamdi (OP)
|
|
October 02, 2012, 12:35:16 AM |
|
nice finds your two links!
too bad geocities is not around anymore.
|
|
|
|
ShireSilver
|
|
October 02, 2012, 12:48:10 AM |
|
The thing that pisses me off the most about web2.0 sites is when they don't allow "open in new tab". I use that all the time.
If I had a time machine I'd go back in time and stop the two biggest mistakes in web browsers: cookies and the damn back button. Its a WEB, not a line.
|
|
|
|
salty
|
|
October 02, 2012, 12:48:53 AM |
|
this. (I dub thee: Japanese Tentacle Animated GIF Eye Rape) Or this. (Warning: May cause seizures, sudden explosive bowel movements, temporary blindness, permanent blindness, urges to throw computer out of nearest window, more seizures, stomach cramps, coma, death, reincarnation then another painful death, apocalyptic tendencies) I understand this site isn't Web 2.0, but I'm too lazy to find a truly terrible Web 2.0 site. <blink> LOL I think they are more web 0.2 than 2.0 </blink>
|
|
|
|
live627
|
|
October 02, 2012, 01:03:03 AM |
|
Define "Web 2.0". You cannot hate something you can't define.
|
|
|
|
ElectricMucus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
|
|
October 02, 2012, 01:06:16 AM |
|
Define "Web 2.0". You cannot hate something you can't define.
OP did that too: a cluttered css monster with lots of ajax.
|
|
|
|
elux
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1458
Merit: 1006
|
|
October 02, 2012, 10:54:54 AM |
|
Line 6, Column 15: an attribute value must be a literal unless it contains only name characters Line 8, Column 41: document type does not allow element "TD" here; assuming missing "TR" start-tag Line 9, Column 17: an attribute value must be a literal unless it contains only name characters Line 9, Column 48: end tag for "FONT" omitted, but its declaration does not permit this Line 9, Column 55: end tag for element "FONT" which is not open Line 10, Column 8: end tag for element "TABLE" which is not open Line 11, Column 14: there is no attribute "COLOR" Line 11, Column 14: an attribute value must be a literal unless it contains only name characters Line 11, Column 31: an attribute value must be a literal unless it contains only name characters Line 14, Column 4: end tag for element "P" which is not open Line 14, Column 17: an attribute value must be a literal unless it contains only name characters Line 15, Column 13: an attribute value must be a literal unless it contains only name characters Line 20, Column 4: end tag for element "P" which is not open Line 21, Column 3: document type does not allow element "P" here
Psshh... There was no HTML validation back in the day.
|
|
|
|
dirtycat
|
|
October 02, 2012, 10:59:11 AM |
|
i miss my lynx browser
|
poop!
|
|
|
herzmeister
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1007
|
|
October 02, 2012, 10:59:47 AM |
|
I'm a bit torn here.
The 1.0 stateless model fits better with the browser navigation model. Wikipedia (for the consumer) is the power app for this.
Web 2.0 allows complex applications to run completely in the browser inside one webpage. Then you don't need to be concerned with problems of storing state information in sessions on the server alongside other users and all the bugs and security problems that can come with it. Most information can be kept client-side, just like in the old age of desktop apps.
|
|
|
|
greyhawk
|
|
October 02, 2012, 11:01:22 AM |
|
Line 6, Column 15: an attribute value must be a literal unless it contains only name characters Line 8, Column 41: document type does not allow element "TD" here; assuming missing "TR" start-tag Line 9, Column 17: an attribute value must be a literal unless it contains only name characters Line 9, Column 48: end tag for "FONT" omitted, but its declaration does not permit this Line 9, Column 55: end tag for element "FONT" which is not open Line 10, Column 8: end tag for element "TABLE" which is not open Line 11, Column 14: there is no attribute "COLOR" Line 11, Column 14: an attribute value must be a literal unless it contains only name characters Line 11, Column 31: an attribute value must be a literal unless it contains only name characters Line 14, Column 4: end tag for element "P" which is not open Line 14, Column 17: an attribute value must be a literal unless it contains only name characters Line 15, Column 13: an attribute value must be a literal unless it contains only name characters Line 20, Column 4: end tag for element "P" which is not open Line 21, Column 3: document type does not allow element "P" here
Psshh... There was no HTML validation back in the day. That's not true. HTML validators have been around since July '94 Let me go find the first one real quick..... There we go http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/1994Jul/0015
|
|
|
|
salty
|
|
October 02, 2012, 02:22:35 PM |
|
i miss my lynx browser
Me too, in fact I'm going to install it now, for old time's sake. Hell I'm going to get ircii as well just for giggles.
|
|
|
|
|
salty
|
|
October 02, 2012, 02:53:06 PM |
|
i miss my lynx browser
Me too, in fact I'm going to install it now, for old time's sake. Hell I'm going to get ircii as well just for giggles. WOW! Lynx is actually still fully working, and installed without any trouble on a mac with xcode and macports. Thanks for the reminder, I will be using this a lot, it's lightning fast and better than adblocker for getting rid of annoying crap
|
|
|
|
greyhawk
|
|
October 02, 2012, 04:08:02 PM |
|
i miss my lynx browser
Me too, in fact I'm going to install it now, for old time's sake. Hell I'm going to get ircii as well just for giggles. WOW! Lynx is actually still fully working, and installed without any trouble on a mac with xcode and macports. Thanks for the reminder, I will be using this a lot, it's lightning fast and better than adblocker for getting rid of annoying crap If I'm not mistaken there are even still fully functional gopher servers around.
|
|
|
|
elux
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1458
Merit: 1006
|
|
October 02, 2012, 10:21:53 PM |
|
Very well, T.I.L. Thanks for posting the actual link. Were you around W3 back then?
|
|
|
|
|