xamido
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 07:10:53 AM |
|
Lol, that logo. And it's only X11, the dev can't make a clone of ethereum (of course). I like you, dev. People like you bring me joy by laughing at your incompetent attempt. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Completion of the website is coming tonight. This will bring with it the future plans, additional services, and yes new graphics. You will be happy. Or no, but if not it will be no ones fault but yours. Lol, my fault that you're releasing a shitty scam coin? Really? Mwahahaha, i was right. You people really are funny, that was a good laugh.
|
|
|
|
1.25L
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 07:16:17 AM |
|
Lol, that logo. And it's only X11, the dev can't make a clone of ethereum (of course). I like you, dev. People like you bring me joy by laughing at your incompetent attempt. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Completion of the website is coming tonight. This will bring with it the future plans, additional services, and yes new graphics. You will be happy. Or no, but if not it will be no ones fault but yours. Lol, my fault that you're releasing a shitty scam coin? Really? Mwahahaha, i was right. You people really are funny, that was a good laugh. all coins are scams in some way its up to the investor if they come out of the scam in profit or not ;p
|
|
|
|
xadsa418
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 08:05:53 AM |
|
CTransaction::FetchInputs Good shrmcoin ProcessMessage Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=10, codehash=7acf425f6f4df6d83c7b Manually checked Good CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity Good arch SendMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR CheckProofOfWork Good arch GetNextTargetRequired Most similar arch, diff=3, codehash=52923f0e242d7d094946 Manually checked Good CBlock::AcceptBlock Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=6, codehash=733005b0dcf1db502dd9 Manually checked Good CBlock::SignBlock Good shrmcoin GetTransaction Good shrmcoin ComputeMinStake Good arch CTransaction::DisconnectInputs Good blackcoin arch ProcessBlock Good shrmcoin CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority Good dash blackcoin arch CTransaction::GetValueIn Good blackcoin arch ComputeMinWork Good arch CTransaction::CheckTransaction Good blackcoin arch CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good blackcoin arch CTransaction::ConnectInputs Good arch CBlock::CheckBlock Most similar shrmcoin, diff=2, codehash=c08c017b2233239318a9 Manually checked Good CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool Good shrmcoin CBlock::SetBestChainInner Good blackcoin arch CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust Good blackcoin arch ProcessMessages Good NEBUCHADNEZZAR CBlock::CheckBlockSignature Good arch CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor Good blackcoin arch CBlock::ConnectBlock Good shrmcoin
GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info? As you know most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this people check the code both manually and automatically. As I know ocminer automatically check code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bug. Earlz check code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that its safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e' means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed. Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.
Maximal number of PoW blocks is 15000, however PoS blocks allowed from the begining. Take this into account.
|
|
|
|
suchnekky
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 08:21:38 AM Last edit: August 10, 2015, 11:58:52 AM by suchnekky |
|
looking good!
|
• ⓢⓤⓒⓗⓝⓔⓚⓚⓨ •
|
|
|
igor107th
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 08:26:27 AM |
|
lol no pump ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
arloseb
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 08:33:16 AM |
|
FTR: was CrusaderCoin, now DarkEther and dev fails basic string replacement task: https://github.com/darkether/darkether/blob/master/src/qt/bitcoinunits.cpp#L33QString BitcoinUnits::name(int unit) { switch(unit) { case BTC: return QString("DETH"); case mBTC: return QString("mCRU"); case uBTC: return QString::fromUtf8("μCRU"); default: return QString("???"); } }
Cheers That's why i see CRU instead of DETH inside wallet. How is possible to make those errors?
|
|
|
|
MantisCoinDev
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 08:45:50 AM |
|
for those that are unaware this my latest coin, i wont leave this one tho. sorry about mantis, i have family issues i had to go sort out.
|
|
|
|
cjmoles
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1017
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 08:47:13 AM |
|
What is all the fuss? You all know what this coin is...take it...or leave it! Right?
|
|
|
|
1.25L
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 08:51:07 AM |
|
What is all the fuss? You all know what this coin is...take it...or leave it! Right?
leave it ..... RIGHT
|
|
|
|
|
1.25L
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 08:59:57 AM |
|
you all should contact cisahasa for the community take over, looks like you're going to need it yeah good choice
|
|
|
|
MantisCoinDev
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 09:00:13 AM |
|
you all should contact cisahasa for the community take over, looks like you're going to need it hmm i dont really have time for this project
|
|
|
|
1.25L
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 10:57:20 AM |
|
is the dev coming back ?? risky
|
|
|
|
gjhiggins
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1278
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 11:24:03 AM |
|
I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins.
You might wish to consider extending the range of inspected coins that you bring to bear. The rather tragic heritage of this coin is explicitly laid out in, of all places, https://github.com/darkether/darkether/blob/master/COPYING (you couldn't make it up). ... Copyright (c) 2014 bitpop Copyright (c) 2014 hackcoin Developers Copyright (c) 2013-2014 NovaCoin Developers Copyright (c) 2011-2012 PPCoin Developers Copyright (c) 2009-2014 Bitcoin Developers
bitpopcoin was abandoned by bitpop and he welcomed re-use of the bitpopcoin source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=665896.0 but I doubt his vision stretched this far. The heritage is “tragic” (or tragi-comic depending on the degree of your Bitcoin monotheism) because hackcoin was a opportunistic hybrid launched over a year ago that combines elements of blackcoin, darkcoin and novacoin. It was promptly filched by infamous serial crapcoin dev Carsen Keck to form the codebase for Dreamcoin and from there diffused into a bunch of other alts (apparently including shrms, arch and nebuchadnezzar, hence their appearance in xadsa418’s analysis). In this particular instance, the reconfiguration fron bitpopcoin is minimal, so much so that after “harmonising” irrelevant differences (e.g. nullifying pure branding differences, project build and repos admin config differences) a straightforward diff reveals the full extent of the changes to the (June 2014) codebase: http://pastebin.com/FFTS2FFB![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FHgJfLJV.jpg&t=665&c=u2BipgZlb9m4LQ) The hackcoin codebase which was cloned for bitpopcoin was already obsolete when hackcoin itself was launched; by that time Dogecoin had already migrated to Bitcoin Core 0.9. I have yet to hallucinate any positive rationale for launching a new altcoin using such an elderly codebase and features. I can’t imagine that it’s the kind of heritage that is likely to provide much support for an inspiring development roadmap. Cheers Graham
|
|
|
|
1.25L
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 11:30:43 AM |
|
seems like a bit of pro fud there
|
|
|
|
suchnekky
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 11:57:57 AM |
|
seems like a bit of pro fud there
yep i think so
|
• ⓢⓤⓒⓗⓝⓔⓚⓚⓨ •
|
|
|
1.25L
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 11:58:37 AM |
|
heaps of volume buy books filling up moon time
|
|
|
|
suchnekky
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 11:59:35 AM |
|
heaps of volume buy books filling up moon time
wait till america wakes up! ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
• ⓢⓤⓒⓗⓝⓔⓚⓚⓨ •
|
|
|
1.25L
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 12:02:50 PM |
|
cant wait for the dev to come back online
|
|
|
|
suchnekky
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 12:03:01 PM |
|
i have a hunch that its the same developer as crave and same pump team, 2 out of the 12 peer nodes i have saved from old logs are identical, plus ive reviewed the code, and the coding style is particularly matching. old codebase or not, still an awsome buy, plenty of coins run old codebases. hmm. i know whats coming next. you literally cant buy any.
|
• ⓢⓤⓒⓗⓝⓔⓚⓚⓨ •
|
|
|
|