DARKETHER DETH NINJA LAUNCH X11 POW POS HYBRID 15k BLOCKS!!!!!

[xamido]

Lol, that logo. And it's only X11, the dev can't make a clone of ethereum (of course).

I like you, dev. People like you bring me joy by laughing at your incompetent attempt. 

Completion of the website is coming tonight. This will bring with it the future plans, additional services, and yes new graphics. You will be happy. Or no, but if not it will be no ones fault but yours.

Lol, my fault that you're releasing a shitty scam coin? Really? Mwahahaha, i was right. You people really are funny, that was a good laugh.

[1.25L]

Lol, that logo. And it's only X11, the dev can't make a clone of ethereum (of course).

I like you, dev. People like you bring me joy by laughing at your incompetent attempt. 

Completion of the website is coming tonight. This will bring with it the future plans, additional services, and yes new graphics. You will be happy. Or no, but if not it will be no ones fault but yours.

Lol, my fault that you're releasing a shitty scam coin? Really? Mwahahaha, i was right. You people really are funny, that was a good laugh.

all coins are scams in some way its up to the investor if they come out of the scam in profit or not ;p

[xadsa418]

CTransaction::FetchInputs          Good      shrmcoin             
ProcessMessage                     Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=10, codehash=7acf425f6f4df6d83c7b Manually checked Good
CMerkleTx::GetBlocksToMaturity     Good      arch                 
SendMessages                       Good      NEBUCHADNEZZAR       
CheckProofOfWork                   Good      arch                 
GetNextTargetRequired              Most similar arch, diff=3, codehash=52923f0e242d7d094946 Manually checked Good
CBlock::AcceptBlock                Most similar NEBUCHADNEZZAR, diff=6, codehash=733005b0dcf1db502dd9 Manually checked Good
CBlock::SignBlock                  Good      shrmcoin             
GetTransaction                     Good      shrmcoin             
ComputeMinStake                    Good      arch                 
CTransaction::DisconnectInputs     Good      blackcoin arch       
ProcessBlock                       Good      shrmcoin             
CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority       Good      dash blackcoin arch 
CTransaction::GetValueIn           Good      blackcoin arch       
ComputeMinWork                     Good      arch                 
CTransaction::CheckTransaction     Good      blackcoin arch       
CWalletTx::AcceptWalletTransaction Good      blackcoin arch       
CTransaction::ConnectInputs        Good      arch                 
CBlock::CheckBlock                 Most similar shrmcoin, diff=2, codehash=c08c017b2233239318a9 Manually checked Good
CMerkleTx::AcceptToMemoryPool      Good      shrmcoin             
CBlock::SetBestChainInner          Good      blackcoin arch       
CBlockIndex::GetBlockTrust         Good      blackcoin arch       
ProcessMessages                    Good      NEBUCHADNEZZAR       
CBlock::CheckBlockSignature        Good      arch                 
CTxOut CTransaction::GetOutputFor  Good      blackcoin arch       
CBlock::ConnectBlock               Good      shrmcoin   

GetProofOfWorkReward Manually checked Good
GetProofOfStakeReward Manually checked Good
What is this? And how to read this info?
As you know most of the coins have very similar code bases. But any little bug could damage the whole blockchain. To avoid this people check the code both manually and automatically.  As I know ocminer automatically check code for already known bugs, so his checks couldn't find new bug. Earlz check code manually, but he also could miss something, because codebase is very huge. I chose different way. I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins. So if you see something like "Good blackcoin arch " it means that i already inspected this code before in blackcoin's and arch's source, and I think that its safe. When my script finds new code it asks me to check it manually and tells me which codebases is most similar, so 'CBlock::ConnectBlock                Most similar blackcoin, diff=5, codehash=1a0a6fb0d9bc6aefff4e'  means that most similar code of CBlock::ConnectBlock have seen in blackcoin and there is 5 places where something was changed.
Currently i check only most important functions in main.cpp.


Maximal number of PoW blocks is 15000, however PoS blocks allowed from the begining. Take this into account.

[suchnekky]

looking good!

[igor107th]

lol no pump 

[arloseb]

FTR: was CrusaderCoin, now DarkEther and dev fails basic string replacement task:

https://github.com/darkether/darkether/blob/master/src/qt/bitcoinunits.cpp#L33

Code:

QString BitcoinUnits::name(int unit)
{
    switch(unit)
    {
    case BTC: return QString("DETH");
    case mBTC: return QString("mCRU");
    case uBTC: return QString::fromUtf8("μCRU");
    default: return QString("???");
    }
}

Cheers


That's why i see CRU instead of DETH inside wallet.
How is possible to make those errors?

[MantisCoinDev]

for those that are unaware this  my latest coin, i wont leave this one tho. sorry about mantis, i have family issues i had to go sort out.

[cjmoles]

What is all the fuss?  You all know what this coin is...take it...or leave it!  Right?

[1.25L]

What is all the fuss?  You all know what this coin is...take it...or leave it!  Right?

leave it ..... RIGHT

[thelion07]

you all should contact cisahasa    for the community take over, looks like you're going to need it 

[1.25L]

you all should contact cisahasa    for the community take over, looks like you're going to need it 

yeah good choice

[MantisCoinDev]

you all should contact cisahasa    for the community take over, looks like you're going to need it  

hmm i dont really have time for this project

[1.25L]

is the dev coming back ?? risky

[gjhiggins]

I wrote the script which compare code in one coin with code in other already inspected coins.

You might wish to consider extending the range of inspected coins that you bring to bear.

The rather tragic heritage of this coin is explicitly laid out in, of all places, https://github.com/darkether/darkether/blob/master/COPYING (you couldn't make it up). ...

Code:

Copyright (c) 2014 bitpop
Copyright (c) 2014 hackcoin Developers
Copyright (c) 2013-2014 NovaCoin Developers
Copyright (c) 2011-2012 PPCoin Developers
Copyright (c) 2009-2014 Bitcoin Developers

bitpopcoin was abandoned by bitpop and he welcomed re-use of the bitpopcoin source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=665896.0 but I doubt his vision stretched this far.

The heritage is “tragic” (or tragi-comic depending on the degree of your Bitcoin monotheism) because hackcoin was a opportunistic hybrid launched over a year ago that combines elements of blackcoin, darkcoin and novacoin. It was promptly filched by infamous serial crapcoin dev Carsen Keck to form the codebase for Dreamcoin and from there diffused into a bunch of other alts (apparently including  shrms, arch and nebuchadnezzar, hence their appearance in xadsa418’s analysis).

In this particular instance, the reconfiguration fron bitpopcoin is minimal, so much so that after “harmonising” irrelevant differences (e.g. nullifying pure branding differences, project build and repos admin config differences) a straightforward diff reveals the full extent of the changes to the (June 2014) codebase:

http://pastebin.com/FFTS2FFB



The hackcoin codebase which was cloned for bitpopcoin was already obsolete when hackcoin itself was launched; by that time Dogecoin had already migrated to Bitcoin Core 0.9.

I have yet to hallucinate any positive rationale for launching a new altcoin using such an elderly codebase and features. I can’t imagine that it’s the kind of heritage that is likely to provide much support for an inspiring development roadmap.

Cheers

Graham

[1.25L]

seems like a bit of pro fud there

[suchnekky]

seems like a bit of pro fud there

yep i think so

[1.25L]

heaps of volume buy books filling up moon time

[suchnekky]

heaps of volume buy books filling up moon time

wait till america wakes up! 

[1.25L]

cant wait for the dev to come back online

[suchnekky]

i have a hunch that its the same developer as crave and same pump team, 2 out of the 12 peer nodes i have saved from old logs are identical, plus ive reviewed the code, and the coding style is particularly matching.

old codebase or not, still an awsome buy, plenty of coins run old codebases.


hmm. i know whats coming next. you literally cant buy any.