hexafraction
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 259
Tips welcomed: 1CF4GhXX1RhCaGzWztgE1YZZUcSpoqTbsJ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 09:35:12 PM |
|
Thousands might make sense, but it will eventually cause performance loss. More transaction data, more outputs that a client/wallet will care about, more network traffic, and more results to bloom flitered requests to nodes. Of course, if you're handling thousands of addresses in an automated manner on a website (not as a direct user of a wallet) you might consider writing code more specific to your use-case, for example using bitcoinj as a library.
|