itsAj (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 08:03:51 PM |
|
Seriously? 11 billion. Not sure what this has to do with population size at year 2100. That was your thinking behind it The coin grows with the population size so is not inherently devalued.
|
|
|
|
jasemoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1008
Forget-about-it
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 08:07:07 PM |
|
quark still has gpu mining, basically X6+3 are you planning on ripping out Ethereum's chain style and replacing it with an x11 or quark mining? at first it sounded like youd do x11 or anything just for initial distribuion then allow ethereum style mining to continue on a new chain once you sort out a gui or webwallet to run on top of an ethereum fork.
|
$MAID & $BTC other than that some short hodls and some long held garbage.
|
|
|
godda04
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 08:08:54 PM |
|
11 billion? Shame, was actually looking forward to this, even worse is your reason behind that number? population in 2100? what?
"The coin grows with the population size so is not inherently devalued."
This has no relevance at all
|
|
|
|
itsAj (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 08:11:21 PM |
|
quark still has gpu mining, basically X6+3 are you planning on ripping out Ethereum's chain style and replacing it with an x11 or quark mining? at first it sounded like youd do x11 or anything just for initial distribuion then allow ethereum style mining to continue on a new chain once you sort out a gui or webwallet to run on top of an ethereum fork.
As you said this is just for the initial distribution, eventually when side chains are in effect we strengthen the network using multiple networks, thats why the private, public blockchains which will be developed in the plan. But I want it to be a fair launch as much as possible. Thanks for the input Jase need to make this launch as clean and friendly as possible but I don't want to reduce it to standardized private hardware.
|
|
|
|
shojayxt
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 08:11:57 PM |
|
You should rethink the x11 algorithm. Also, please do not make this a POS coin. You should lower the coin count and follow an emission curve similar to bitcoin with diminishing block rewards rather than block halving.
I think you would get much support from serious individuals if you make an ethereum fork with POW as the distribution method. I would stick to the current ethereum mining scheme without moving to x11. You'll avoid many of the mining farms and rentals that will just end up dumping whatever they mine.
A clean ethereum fork with a fair POW launch would be the best launch of any coin in months.
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 08:14:16 PM |
|
Yes i've got lots of trouble sending/crediting funds in ETH with my test-pool... tbh currently i'm stuck but in contact with the devs concerning that. If you go X11 and "Standard-Codebase", I'll have a pool ready in a few mins, no prob. Let me know in pm or public portion of funds to keep the pool running for a couple of years, the cpu mining will really help backbone of the network. First thing I have to do is negotiate with pool operators and I'd rather deal with you that is legitimate than others. As long as there are miners, there will be the pool.
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
itsAj (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 08:15:21 PM |
|
POS model is good and can secure the network well, also electricity cost is completely reduced. But POS leads to inflation and devalueing, this is why POW and complete fixed supply. I chose to distribute it first like this because many serious issues have to be patched because there is serious vulnerabilities within it. Keep up the conversation its good getting input from the community first.
|
|
|
|
jasemoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1008
Forget-about-it
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 08:17:28 PM |
|
You should rethink the x11 algorithm. Also, please do not make this a POS coin. You should lower the coin count and follow an emission curve similar to bitcoin with diminishing block rewards rather than block halving.
I think you would get much support from serious individuals if you make an ethereum fork with POW as the distribution method. I would stick to the current ethereum mining scheme without moving to x11. You'll avoid many of the mining farms and rentals that will just end up dumping whatever they mine.
A clean ethereum fork with a fair POW launch would be the best launch of any coin in months.
First POW GUI ethereum fork wins. POS GUI ethereum fork will win next. then country, dark, animal, color, masternode etc. ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
$MAID & $BTC other than that some short hodls and some long held garbage.
|
|
|
defaced
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2198
Merit: 1012
Franko is Freedom
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 08:26:30 PM |
|
Will this be POW initial distribution? If so X11 is a bad idea as it will just get raped by mining farms.
I'm picking X11 because of CPU friendly meaning that many can mine it. You don't need specialized hardware just CPU power. Plus it's probably the securist algo at this current time apart from SHA-256. Network needs to be secure otherwise it will be useless. X11 hashing hasnt been cpu friendly since 2 weeks after Xcoin (Xcurrency) launched in January 2014... you can get 1G/hash for .37BTC a day on miningrigrentals right now. and would struggle to get 1Mhash out of a cpu? edit to add: you know launching a stable x11 coin will be a gpu rape festival like everything else thats launched lately. ethereum has cpu/gpu and ive been cpu mining since friday with no luck, it'll only get worse once gpu documentation spills out in a more digestible format It's not going to be a 24 hour mining period, the mining period will have to last for years to make POW security even moderately feasible, unless POS method is used, then rich get richer etc. The good thing about x11 it has a number of algos inside it it will be hard to crack them even with most advanced computing methods. lol 1 is good 11 must be better! x11 is only as strong as its weakest hash... "11 suffers from the problems stemming from increased propagation latency and slow verification, and adds even worse susceptibility to ASIC advantage. It is a mere mishmash of 11 separate algorithms" - coblee
|
|
|
|
Colonel Crouton
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 10, 2015, 11:57:20 PM |
|
Yes i've got lots of trouble sending/crediting funds in ETH with my test-pool... tbh currently i'm stuck but in contact with the devs concerning that. If you go X11 and "Standard-Codebase", I'll have a pool ready in a few mins, no prob. What does X11 and "Standard-Codebase" mean? Ethereum is all new code, correct?
|
Ten-Hut!
|
|
|
fartbags
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1004
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 11, 2015, 07:36:18 PM |
|
Looks good. I'm following this idea.
|
|
|
|
LordCoder
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 11, 2015, 07:43:38 PM |
|
SHA256 isn't an encryption.
|
|
|
|
wildduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 12, 2015, 08:34:47 AM |
|
Looks very good, i will be watching this coin ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
SushiNoTomato
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 15, 2015, 05:48:37 AM |
|
Should be called FeatherRum ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
|
BlackPanda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 15, 2015, 06:06:53 AM |
|
any info more dev ?
|
|
|
|
fartbags
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1004
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2015, 05:38:35 AM |
|
Did the dev leave this coin already ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
|
wildduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 18, 2015, 06:28:03 AM |
|
It looks like that the dev already gone
|
|
|
|
|
wildduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
September 07, 2015, 10:47:55 AM |
|
Yes it looks like dead
|
|
|
|
|