Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 06:13:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Building a Dedicated Super 'Node' - Crypto Accelerator Cards etc.  (Read 14966 times)
BitcoinFX (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1720


https://youtu.be/DsAVx0u9Cw4 ... Dr. WHO < KLF


View Profile WWW
April 16, 2010, 07:00:32 AM
 #1

Lets design and specify components for building Dedicated 'Super' Bitcoin Nodes.

All aspects considered chipsets, CPU, design, power saving, cost saving, green tech. OS, security etc. etc.

Sun Crypto Accelerator 6000 PCIe Card

http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/networking/031146.htm

More links soon... discuss...

"Bitcoin OG" 1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp | Bitcoin logo™ Enforcer? | Bitcoin is BTC | CSW is NOT Satoshi Nakamoto | I Mine BTC, LTC, ZEC, XMR and GAP | BTC on Tor addnodes Project | Media enquiries : Wu Ming | Enjoy The Money Machine | "You cannot compete with Open Source" and "Cryptography != Banana" | BSV and BCH are COUNTERFEIT.
1714846421
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714846421

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714846421
Reply with quote  #2

1714846421
Report to moderator
Remember that Bitcoin is still beta software. Don't put all of your money into BTC!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714846421
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714846421

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714846421
Reply with quote  #2

1714846421
Report to moderator
1714846421
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714846421

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714846421
Reply with quote  #2

1714846421
Report to moderator
The Madhatter
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 509


My avatar pic says it all


View Profile
April 16, 2010, 04:25:19 PM
 #2

The board you mention looks very sweet. The name of the game here is cheap and abundant. Lots of super nodes at a low cost. Smiley

I was thinking of these boards actually:

http://www.soekris.com/vpn1401.htm

You can stuff 4-6 of them in each machine (depends on the motherboard you are using) and round-robin the crypto operations. (Open/FreeBSD can do this already for the HiFn chip.)

4 would be $288/server (1000Mbps of operations)
6 would be $426/server (1500Mbps of operations)

theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5194
Merit: 12972


View Profile
April 16, 2010, 05:31:10 PM
 #3

Neither of those cards support SHA-256.

I would want to test several CPUs to see which has the best hashes-to-watts ratio. I suspect that a few modern CPUs would actually be better than a lot of old ones, but I'm not sure. All each node would need is a motherboard, CPU(s), and 512MB of RAM. They can boot from the network.

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
SmokeTooMuch
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 860
Merit: 1021


View Profile
April 16, 2010, 05:57:54 PM
 #4

the new core i7 have RSA-acceleration, not sure whether SHA takes advantages of this.

Date Registered: 2009-12-10 | I'm using GPG, pm me for my public key. | Bitcoin on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/btc
The Madhatter
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 509


My avatar pic says it all


View Profile
April 16, 2010, 06:04:06 PM
 #5

Hmm.. I didn't notice that. They will still perform the public/private key stuff. The SHA-256 functions can be performed on the host CPU. The cards would offload most of the processing.

I guess it boils down to best bang for the buck. Some benchmarks and pricing would need to be worked out to find the best fit.
Xunie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 132
Merit: 101



View Profile
April 17, 2010, 05:38:30 AM
 #6

I guess it boils down to best bang for the buck.

Note: we also need to keep in mind the energy usage of each part, just sayin'.

Ignore this: 734d417914faa443d74e8205f639dfb0f79fdc44988ecae44db31e5636525afe

Caffeinism -- a toxic condition caused by excessive ingestion of coffee and other caffeine-containing beverage.
The Madhatter
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 509


My avatar pic says it all


View Profile
April 17, 2010, 05:12:37 PM
 #7

Yup. Keeping it "green" is a good idea. Just be sure to use an 80-plus or 90-plus power supply, low power CPU, etc.
BitcoinFX (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1720


https://youtu.be/DsAVx0u9Cw4 ... Dr. WHO < KLF


View Profile WWW
April 18, 2010, 12:44:10 AM
 #8

I'm based in the UK. Here are a few innovative companies that I'm considering using when I implement and migrate some of my services.

Green Tech. ( Energy Saving / Custom Builds etc. )

Very PC - http://www.very-pc.co.uk/

Green ISP - http://www.greenisp.net/

Please post similar links for your countries / region Grin


P.S. What Linux OS do you side towards ? Ubuntu, Open SUSE, BSD, Other ? http://distrowatch.com/

"Bitcoin OG" 1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp | Bitcoin logo™ Enforcer? | Bitcoin is BTC | CSW is NOT Satoshi Nakamoto | I Mine BTC, LTC, ZEC, XMR and GAP | BTC on Tor addnodes Project | Media enquiries : Wu Ming | Enjoy The Money Machine | "You cannot compete with Open Source" and "Cryptography != Banana" | BSV and BCH are COUNTERFEIT.
Xunie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 132
Merit: 101



View Profile
April 19, 2010, 01:00:33 AM
 #9

BitcoinFX, I suggest using LFS (Linux From Scratch) to build a netboot image that when it generates a new block, it will send it to an bitcoin address or IP.
But that's just me.
(PS: It would be nice if someone created a bitcoin farmer/miner that does not run under a kernel but runs directly on the hardware, might improve speed!)

Ignore this: 734d417914faa443d74e8205f639dfb0f79fdc44988ecae44db31e5636525afe

Caffeinism -- a toxic condition caused by excessive ingestion of coffee and other caffeine-containing beverage.
thufir
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 23, 2010, 06:02:34 AM
 #10

That's awesome Xunie. It will happen. Also, I bet you this wont be far to follow: Bot nets of compromised machines generating and sending bitcoins anonymously to their master.
BitcoinFX (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1720


https://youtu.be/DsAVx0u9Cw4 ... Dr. WHO < KLF


View Profile WWW
July 18, 2010, 11:06:42 AM
 #11

These 'combo' seem quite reasonable...

High performance IPSec and SSL PCI network accelerator card with Cavium CN1010

ABC-130 - http://www.portwell.com/products/detail.asp?CUSTCHAR1=ABC-130

High performance IPSec and SSL PCI network accelerator card with Cavium CN1005

ABC-140 - http://www.portwell.com/products/detail.asp?CUSTCHAR1=ABC-140

High performance IPSec and SSL PCI-X network accelerator card with Cavium CN1010X

ABC-200 - http://www.portwell.com/products/detail.asp?CUSTCHAR1=ABC-200

"Bitcoin OG" 1JXFXUBGs2ZtEDAQMdZ3tkCKo38nT2XSEp | Bitcoin logo™ Enforcer? | Bitcoin is BTC | CSW is NOT Satoshi Nakamoto | I Mine BTC, LTC, ZEC, XMR and GAP | BTC on Tor addnodes Project | Media enquiries : Wu Ming | Enjoy The Money Machine | "You cannot compete with Open Source" and "Cryptography != Banana" | BSV and BCH are COUNTERFEIT.
Ground Loop
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 18, 2010, 06:20:02 PM
 #12

The problem is that much of the VPN/Crypto hardware is aimed at high bandwidth crypto, or high speed RSA calculations and the like.  "Heavy Lifting"

Our needs are much simpler.. we just want to run a lot of hashes.  Even IO bandwidth isn't all that important, since we know the entire set of input data to hash, and we're only interested in characteristics of the output, and not even the hash values need to be output at all.

You can run SHA-256 on a Xilinx Spartan 3A at about 7 Mbps per MHz, so 280MHz should crunch 2170 Gbps, and you should be able to run quite a few cores given our meager I/O requirements.


Bitcoin accepted here: 1HrAmQk9EuH3Ak6ugsw3qi3g23DG6YUNPq
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!