Thoughts regarding "satoshis" post today on the mailing list?

[NattyLiteCoin]

Apologies for the negativity, I just think the communities is misplacing their energy. I don't believe that was SN

[1714858373]

1714858373

[coinableS]

I did sir, the fact that you have to debate 6 pages of whether a person who may or may not exist is fucking laughable.

So you agree the only reason you posted on this thread was to spam a coin that only exists because the person "who may or may not" exist laid the blueprint and did all the work for Charlie Lee?
Let's stay on topic here, shall we? And keep altcoin discussion in the altcoin section.

[NattyLiteCoin]

Actually, let's keep it on topic. If it was SN BTC is in a very bad position which sucks. I've been putting away BTC for my God son because I believe in it. If the project is considered failed, what's to not have him dump coins from the genesis block and cause hysteria. If it wasn't SN, you have some one that's artificially introducing a divide into the community for probably their own gain. Dishonesty, which is contradictory to what SN was try to circumvent by removing centralized authority of our money.

Again apologies for the initial posting.

[coinableS]

Actually, let's keep it on topic. If it was SN BTC is in a very bad position which sucks.

Agreed. But if Gavin and Mike are going rogue then I'm glad Satoshi said something about his disapproval.

I've been putting away BTC for my God son because I believe in it. If the project is considered failed, what's to not have him dump coins from the genesis block and cause hysteria.

What if he destroyed those keys? It's possible he got rid of them.

If it wasn't SN, you have some one that's artificially introducing a divide into the community for probably their own gain. Dishonesty, which is contradictory to what SN was try to circumvent by removing centralized authority of our money.

If it wasn't him then someone has access to a very powerful email address, and they haven't used it for anything else nefarious except that one email. It seems strange to me that a thief would show such restraint.

Again apologies for the initial posting.

NP, we're all on the same team, team crypto

[NattyLiteCoin]

With the keys, I could see intentionally destroying them. He did not 'lose' them, that's a certainty in my mind. He could have kept them for, I don't know, leverage for something like this. It's 5"/50, I personally believe they exist.

[gentlemand]

If it wasn't SN, you have some one that's artificially introducing a divide into the community for probably their own gain. Dishonesty, which is contradictory to what SN was try to circumvent by removing centralized authority of our money.

Unfortunately it's that pesky human factor which wrecks countless wonderful ideas. I don't think BTC will be any type of exception.