how did you fools let Mike Hearn in?

[gentlemand]

I think he's doing the best he can and you make the impression of a new Gavincoin-shill.

'The best he can' should involve pruning all the shite and spam in a place where people should be able to discuss whatever they feel is important. Anything beyond that goes overboard.

[1715336537]

1715336537

[1715336537]

1715336537

[1715336537]

1715336537

[1715336537]

1715336537

[1715336537]

1715336537

[maokoto]

But really are bigger blocks the only solution? I do not understand the problem very much.

[balu2]

But really are bigger blocks the only solution? I do not understand the problem very much.

Bigger blocks are a really bad 'solution' ... actually no real solution as there will be massive tradeoffs with security and privacy.
I personally believe there must be other ways found than raising blocksize for that much.
Probably these eggheads just need to work out something new?

[meono]

But really are bigger blocks the only solution? I do not understand the problem very much.

Bigger blocks are a really bad 'solution' ... actually no real solution as there will be massive tradeoffs with security and privacy.
I personally believe there must be other ways found than raising blocksize for that much.
Probably these eggheads just need to work out something new?

Yes the eggheads here: https://blockstream.com/team/

Proposed a new "solution" : Their project ! A centralized system. Notice any core devs in there? oh geee They must have no agenda at all!

[johnyj]

Gavin and Mike should be highly respected since they have done lots of work since the beginning, but they are taking the step towards split without reaching full consensus, this is very confusing

IMO, if you can't agree on a change, you should keep the status as current, until you run into a problem and everyone will have much more facts when they are making a decision. Currently everyone is using their imagination to make decisions, like gambling

[LiteCoinGuy]

i don't care about who is behind the scene, nor about bitcoin xt, but bigger blocks are needed, if you want this baby to grows, it's like not giving the good amount of foods to your children...

stop it, or i ban you!

[Mickeyb]

Well he's here pretty much from the beginning. Nobody let him in, he has join by himself. Isn't this the point of decentralized and open source system, anybody can join and quit whenever they feel so!

can they really?

the code in reality is controlled by so few (with a love it or leave it attitude).

like with most things bitcoin; reality is far removed from the theory of it.

Well if the reality is really like that, then the Bitcoin is headed in the wrong direction. Satoshi definitely hasn't envisioned this kind of centralization for Bitcoin.

[kelsey]

Well he's here pretty much from the beginning. Nobody let him in, he has join by himself. Isn't this the point of decentralized and open source system, anybody can join and quit whenever they feel so!

can they really?

the code in reality is controlled by so few (with a love it or leave it attitude).

like with most things bitcoin; reality is far removed from the theory of it.

Well if the reality is really like that, then the Bitcoin is headed in the wrong direction. Satoshi definitely hasn't envisioned this kind of centralization for Bitcoin.

"The Bitcoin Core project has shown it cannot reform and so it must be abandoned." Mike Hearn

showing his true colours and what he's really trying to do;  ol divide and conquer 101