The controversy is not caused by XT.
-snip-
So running a dangerous and risky fork attempt is the right way to go? Implementing controversial and buggy patches is what we should be doing?
"Cause and effect" is the what I am saying. XT is the "effect" of the disagreement.
Your dislike for XT (dangerous or risky) does not change the fact that this controversy is not
caused by XT.
It's too many Core Devs are in the BlockStream pact. They refuse to accept any raise of blocksize. That is the core of the problem (pun intended).
This is wrong again. Some of them do not like the idea of raising it. The others just can't reach consensus as to when to raise it and how much to raise it. XT supporters needs to stop spreading this as it is not right.
Please read what I wrote and read what you wrote. They mean the same thing. "Too many" means not everyone, similar to "some" and those "do not like the idea of raising (the limit)" are "refusing to accept any raise of blocksize (limit)". What is incorrect about my statement?
Read my previous posts if you will. I am not the "supporter" you seem to believe I am. My idea of a good resolution to this controversy is obviously Core raising the limit. They aren't moving along as fast as they should. I see no end to this and there is a need to voice out, "tell" them what we users want.