Bitcoin Forum
November 13, 2024, 01:44:58 AM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Is there evidence that there is a correlation between difficulty and price?  (Read 2628 times)
kokojie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1003



View Profile
October 19, 2012, 02:15:03 PM
 #21

difficulty follows price (all else being equal)... it's as simple as that. People thinking it's the other way around must think again.

Only if technology didn't improve, if ASIC is available in abundance, then difficulty can double quickly without seeing any movement in price.

btc: 15sFnThw58hiGHYXyUAasgfauifTEB1ZF6
sturle
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1437
Merit: 1002

https://bitmynt.no


View Profile WWW
October 19, 2012, 04:49:33 PM
 #22

difficulty follows price (all else being equal)... it's as simple as that. People thinking it's the other way around must think again.
Only if technology didn't improve, if ASIC is available in abundance, then difficulty can double quickly without seeing any movement in price.
Doubling, tripling or a a thousandfold increase in difficulty will have no effect on price.  Technology improvement or not.  Halving of difficulty will have no effect on the price.  There is simply no reason for mining difficulty to have any effect on the price.

Sjå https://bitmynt.no for veksling av bitcoin mot norske kroner.  Trygt, billig, raskt og enkelt sidan 2010.
I buy with EUR and other currencies at a fair market price when you want to sell.  See http://bitmynt.no/eurprice.pl
Warning: "Bitcoin" XT, Classic, Unlimited and the likes are scams. Don't use them, and don't listen to their shills.
Este Nuno (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1002


amarha


View Profile
October 19, 2012, 05:40:49 PM
 #23

It's kind of amazing how well designed bitcoin is though. The mining part of it being self-regulating is impressive imo.

Satoshi is a god damn genius. Tongue
johnyj
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1988
Merit: 1012


Beyond Imagination


View Profile
October 29, 2012, 01:38:44 AM
 #24

difficulty follows price (all else being equal)... it's as simple as that. People thinking it's the other way around must think again.
Only if technology didn't improve, if ASIC is available in abundance, then difficulty can double quickly without seeing any movement in price.
Doubling, tripling or a a thousandfold increase in difficulty will have no effect on price.  Technology improvement or not.  Halving of difficulty will have no effect on the price.  There is simply no reason for mining difficulty to have any effect on the price.

I think difficulty do affect price. People will try many difference approach to get BTC. If the difficulty is too high, then it is not very practical to setup mining rigs, those who want to invest in BTC will simply buy them, this will lift the price of BTC. So it is balanced by itself


scrybe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 29, 2012, 02:48:52 AM
 #25

I think difficulty do affect price. People will try many difference approach to get BTC. If the difficulty is too high, then it is not very practical to setup mining rigs, those who want to invest in BTC will simply buy them, this will lift the price of BTC. So it is balanced by itself

Hmm, let's run this through a couple scenarios for this. (I'm just kludging them together, feel free to shoot at the principles, but the specifics are made up to create outsized issues that my brain can get a handle on)

Environment:
ASIC is out and humming, technology is stable and no preorders are on the horizon that will change things.
Bitcoin mining with current equipment over 12 months results in a ~100% profit according to common current projections.
50% of mining income is used to buy new hardware to keep up with other miners.

Event: Bitcoin loses 50% value
Result: Miners are in survival mode, those who cannot afford the outlay have to put equipment purchases on hold, and bleed devalued bitcoins paying for electricity. difficulty slows or drops as some gear is deemed too unprofitable to afford to run and is powered down.

Event: Bitcoin gains 100% value
Result: Miners are in bonanza mode, profit taking and large hardware purchases will be popular, difficulty will shoot up with this new gear until some equilibrium is reached.

Event: Protocol change renders 50% of mining equipment useless (I know it's out there, but I could not think of another big forcing)
Result: 50% of miners are dancing in the street as their BTC profits go up 100%, other 50% want to kill them. Some of the excess profits will go towards new hardware, as will some investment by the failed miners replacing obsolete hardware, some will drop out entirely. Price may be effected by 20-minute blocktimes for up to 2 weeks, but it would only qualify as a panic, not a factually based reaction. After the On the whole the same amount of BTC is generated, and sold to others who want to buy or are selling hardware.

Event: New Big Fish 1 and New Big Fish 2 start fighting over BitCoin, increasing difficulty by 100% over 3 months
Result: Massive increase in difficulty because of governments or megacorps doing speculative mining with millions of dollars in custom fabbed hardware. Tinfoil hats hold a party, others are annoyed that "The Man" is making his own bitcoins instead of buying ours. Value of Bitcoin shoots up due to difficulty conflict, but only because of the perceived legitimacy, not because the difficulty is high. Many miners shut down inefficient capacity, but some keep some running for ideological reasons.

That's my take on those 4 scenarios, in my scorebook it's pretty obvious that 1 and 2 would happen, and it demonstrates the implied causation between price and difficulty. 3 and 4 are a bit more of a stretch, but in each case I found that the root cause of the price and the difficulty change was largely the same, with the differences in all 4 scenarios being transitory until mining capacity matches price, not the other way around.

I think you are right that there is a short term force applied on the price if there is a large difficulty swing, but I think it's noise compared with the actual event, or the phase of the moon http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/36301/2/b2092645.0001.001.pdf.

"...as simple as possible, but no simpler" -AE
BTC/TRC/FRC: 1ScrybeSNcjqgpPeYNgvdxANArqoC6i5u Ripple:rf9gutfmGB8CH39W2PCeRbLWMKRauYyVfx LTC:LadmiD6tXq7gFZvMibhFUZegUHKXgbu1Gb
byronbb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000


HODL OR DIE


View Profile
October 29, 2012, 08:29:37 AM
 #26

It's kind of amazing how well designed bitcoin is though. The mining part of it being self-regulating is impressive imo.

Satoshi is a god damn genius. Tongue

It's incredible. The fact it works is amazing in it self, and then you pile on the depth of design and we approach pure brilliance. 

sturle
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1437
Merit: 1002

https://bitmynt.no


View Profile WWW
October 29, 2012, 11:53:04 AM
 #27

difficulty follows price (all else being equal)... it's as simple as that. People thinking it's the other way around must think again.
Only if technology didn't improve, if ASIC is available in abundance, then difficulty can double quickly without seeing any movement in price.
Doubling, tripling or a a thousandfold increase in difficulty will have no effect on price.  Technology improvement or not.  Halving of difficulty will have no effect on the price.  There is simply no reason for mining difficulty to have any effect on the price.
I think difficulty do affect price. People will try many difference approach to get BTC. If the difficulty is too high, then it is not very practical to setup mining rigs, those who want to invest in BTC will simply buy them, this will lift the price of BTC. So it is balanced by itself
Unlikely.  This may have been the case back in 2010 when one could still find blocks when CPU mining on common equipment.  (Those blocks weren't worth much, of course.)  Nowadays one need either very fast and expensive GPUs to get BTC at any reasonable speed and marginal profit, and investing in GPUs for mining now is guaranteed to be a loss.  Or one needs highly specialized equipment, which I doubt anyone will buy unless they have experience with Bitcoin already.  And Bitcoin has become very easy to buy.  It just doesn't make sense to invest in expensive specialized equipment with uncertain profit margin and mining for weeks for a few coins, when you can buy as many coins as you want today or tomorrow.  If you want to invest in BTC, you invest in BTC.  If you want to invest in mining, you invest in mining.

Sjå https://bitmynt.no for veksling av bitcoin mot norske kroner.  Trygt, billig, raskt og enkelt sidan 2010.
I buy with EUR and other currencies at a fair market price when you want to sell.  See http://bitmynt.no/eurprice.pl
Warning: "Bitcoin" XT, Classic, Unlimited and the likes are scams. Don't use them, and don't listen to their shills.
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!