Bitcoin Forum
November 10, 2024, 11:25:11 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Will Butterfly Labs release hardware with efficiency close to their current claims?
Yes - 22 (48.9%)
No - 23 (51.1%)
Total Voters: 45

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Do you think BFL will hit their claimed 1Gh/J efficiency?  (Read 1672 times)
Shadow383 (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 17, 2012, 03:26:51 PM
 #1

So, do you think BFL will hit their oddly rounded target of 1Gh/s per watt?
We've heard a lot of power estimates from other ASIC manufacturers that are mostly in the range of 200-500Mh/J, with BFL claiming 1000Mh/J, do you think they'll hit this, or is it all likely to turn out incorrect like the early "1000Mh/s @ 20W" estimates from the original BFL single?

Just curious to find out what the community thinks - personally I don't take issue with the idea that BFL will come out with the most power efficient product (they've had more money to throw at the problem than anyone else for starters) but given that the last lot of estimates they made from simulations gave a claimed efficiency of five times what was achieved with the final product I'm somewhat skeptical. Will be interested to see what happens with the BTCFPGA products - supposedly molex powered, implying a limit of ~110W @ 54Gh/s unless they're using multiple plugs, so if BFL can produce a product slightly more efficient they may well hit their numbers.
I've also made up a quick bet if anyone wants to put their money where their mouth is over this:
http://betsofbitco.in/item?id=782
hamdi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 17, 2012, 03:37:52 PM
 #2

if they deliver..
Shadow383 (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 17, 2012, 05:14:13 PM
 #3

if they deliver..
Naturally.
They might not deliver before 2013, but I happen to think they'll ship something  Cheesy
BlackHeartFund
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile
October 17, 2012, 08:21:30 PM
 #4

I would bet no in 2013.
VeeMiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 752
Merit: 500


bitcoin hodler


View Profile
October 18, 2012, 09:52:26 AM
 #5

I hope they will...
bobitza
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 256



View Profile
October 18, 2012, 01:57:25 PM
 #6

So, do you think BFL will hit their oddly rounded target of 1Gh/s per watt?

And you really needed another topic to ask this question?

ApeSwap.
The next-gen AMM,
Staking and Farming
Protocol on BSC
           ▄██▄
          ██████
          ██████
          ██████ ▄▄███▄
          █████
███▀ ▀▀█
    ▄█████████████▌    ▀█
   ██▀  ▀█████████▄     ▀█
  ██      █████████▄
 ▄█▀       █████████▄
▀▀          ▀█████████▄
              ▀█████████▄
                ▀█████████▄
                   ▀▀▀▀▀▀██
██████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██████
Stake now
for over 900% APR!
██████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██████
Shadow383 (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 19, 2012, 12:15:01 AM
 #7

So, do you think BFL will hit their oddly rounded target of 1Gh/s per watt?

And you really needed another topic to ask this question?
I was curious to know what public opinion was - guess it's "I don't give a flying fuck"  Cheesy
Fiyasko
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001


Okey Dokey Lokey


View Profile
October 28, 2012, 06:28:52 AM
 #8

Im a guy who preordered a Jalapeno, I Harshly doubt it will have such efficiency, And i do not care, I just Need Dat Speed to compete

http://bitcoin-otc.com/viewratingdetail.php?nick=DingoRabiit&sign=ANY&type=RECV <-My Ratings
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857670.0 GAWminers and associated things are not to be trusted, Especially the "mineral" exchange
scrybe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 29, 2012, 12:56:49 AM
Last edit: October 29, 2012, 01:45:06 AM by scrybe
 #9

At this point, I think they know well enough that Josh would have shut the heck up about it.

Instead he got more confrontational (IMHO, maybe it was just a bad day) which would point towards increased confidence.

Within 10% at least, he was willing to stake BTC1000 on it!

FYI, all haters that think BFL is going to skip town or other complete fail should be answering "#DIV/0!"

"...as simple as possible, but no simpler" -AE
BTC/TRC/FRC: 1ScrybeSNcjqgpPeYNgvdxANArqoC6i5u Ripple:rf9gutfmGB8CH39W2PCeRbLWMKRauYyVfx LTC:LadmiD6tXq7gFZvMibhFUZegUHKXgbu1Gb
abracadabra
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 956
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 29, 2012, 01:14:56 AM
 #10

No
quasarbtc
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 29, 2012, 02:42:08 AM
 #11

Perhaps. There is a lot of hot air going around if they do not.
MrTeal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004


View Profile
October 29, 2012, 03:06:34 AM
 #12

Probably. BFL seems to be better funded than the other ASIC developers. Given the power claims we're seeing out of 110/130nm, I wouldn't be surprised at this point to see 1Gh/J out of something like 65nm with a full custom design.
ARapalo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 93
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 08, 2012, 02:58:00 AM
 #13

Nope, won't happen. Could have claimed anything since there are no proof of these ASICs even existing yet.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!