No o.O.
ALL transaction regarding the funds from the blocks after the fork will be invalidated. The destroyed fork will have all those transaction simply not exist in the final block chain.
I'm not talking about the nitpicky stuff. Or special circumstance.
You just can't have two people both get the 25BTC+TXfee per block. The end.
I don't know if i'm not explaining what i'm trying to say or something? Both fork will find the same blocks #, but there can only be one instance in the end. And whoever is in the destroyed fork will have no BTC from them after the merge. This also include the tx fee, the transaction, everything.
Yes, I understand what you are saying. The coinbase transactions and all of the following transactions in one fork can not exist when the forks combine.
Sure but what i'm saying has nothing to do with coinbase per see. All transactions to and from coinbase would also get hit just like all non coinbase transaction as well. And coinbase would actually be less catastrophic internally because internal transaction doesn't go through the blockchain.
But regardless, even though it could be possible to operate, they would shut it down, since there is no way Coinbase or any proper exchange would continue to operate in those conditions.
I'm not taking about coinbase the company. I'm talking about the transactions which generate the block reward, which are called coinbase transactions.
Oh my bad, those are low level protocol stuff which are too complicated to explain imo, beyond the conceptual display that "Blocks are generated and credited from 0x address after being verified by the network".
But anyways all transactions would be invalidated, not just block generation, however so i didn't even think you could be talking about such low level details. It's just that the root of all problems does come from just that.
