My trust.

[snailmen]

Resolved, thank you for understanding.

[1714802816]

1714802816

[1714802816]

1714802816

[1714802816]

1714802816

[1714802816]

1714802816

[1714802816]

1714802816

[Quickseller]

lol, blazr is not my alt. You are a scammer, and the more you post the more certain I am that you are candystripes

[EthanB]

Sorry for clickbait.   lol well Quickseller's alt just gave me red trust because he's a dickhead who has low self-esteem. He linked an invalid scam report. Can someone explain why I am still marked a scammer when I am in fact not one at all?

Trust is not moderated, due to certain implications.. So in a sense all trust is "allowed".

[Lauda]

Looks like people keep requesting more drama and doing so in the wrong section. Have you even read the rules of the forum at all?

19. Possible (or real) scams and Trust ratings are not moderated (to prevent moderation abuse).

In other words, I can leave you any rating that I want for any reason that I want. Trust is only moderated in very rare cases (e.g. hacks, a lot of abuse from a single person, etc.). In other words, there is no point in making this thread.

[DiamondCardz]

* DiamondCardz sighs

This stuff is still going on?

The trust system is supposed to be unmoderated. The only time trust will be removed is if a troll has spammed your trust, as far as I'm aware. Anything else, even if it's false, isn't going to be removed - else the idea of a trust system like the one currently in place is worthless.

[redsn0w]

* DiamondCardz sighs

This stuff is still going on?

The trust system is supposed to be unmoderated. The only time trust will be removed is if a troll has spammed your trust, as far as I'm aware. Anything else, even if it's false, isn't going to be removed - else the idea of a trust system like the one currently in place is worthless.

*Or also when an account is 'hacked' or it's supposed to be hacked. Like the Wardrick story, he left some negative, neutral feedback(s) recently... and now some of them (or all) have been removed (probably by theymos).

[BurgerKill]

* DiamondCardz sighs

This stuff is still going on?

The trust system is supposed to be unmoderated. The only time trust will be removed is if a troll has spammed your trust, as far as I'm aware. Anything else, even if it's false, isn't going to be removed - else the idea of a trust system like the one currently in place is worthless.

*Or also when an account is 'hacked' or it's supposed to be hacked. Like the Wardrick story, he left some negative, neutral feedback(s) recently... and now some of them (or all) have been removed (probably by theymos).

The trust ratings were removed by theymos because he suspected that the account was compromised. I'll add the quote here.

I suspect that Wardrick's account was compromised around May, though I'm not 100% sure. But I'm not hearing any evidence one way or another from anyone who previously owned the account, so I suppose the account will be locked for some time. Therefore, I removed Wardrick's recent sent trust ratings. He can rewrite them later if his account is ever restored.

[DiamondCardz]

* DiamondCardz sighs

This stuff is still going on?

The trust system is supposed to be unmoderated. The only time trust will be removed is if a troll has spammed your trust, as far as I'm aware. Anything else, even if it's false, isn't going to be removed - else the idea of a trust system like the one currently in place is worthless.

*Or also when an account is 'hacked' or it's supposed to be hacked. Like the Wardrick story, he left some negative, neutral feedback(s) recently... and now some of them (or all) have been removed (probably by theymos).

Yep, I suppose so - a bit of a niche case though. I'm fairly certain Blazr hasn't been hacked, too

Nice signature, by the way. Reminds me of Shia LaBeouf.

[redsn0w]

* DiamondCardz sighs

This stuff is still going on?

The trust system is supposed to be unmoderated. The only time trust will be removed is if a troll has spammed your trust, as far as I'm aware. Anything else, even if it's false, isn't going to be removed - else the idea of a trust system like the one currently in place is worthless.

*Or also when an account is 'hacked' or it's supposed to be hacked. Like the Wardrick story, he left some negative, neutral feedback(s) recently... and now some of them (or all) have been removed (probably by theymos).

The trust ratings were removed by theymos because he suspected that the account was compromised. I'll add the quote here.

I suspect that Wardrick's account was compromised around May, though I'm not 100% sure. But I'm not hearing any evidence one way or another from anyone who previously owned the account, so I suppose the account will be locked for some time. Therefore, I removed Wardrick's recent sent trust ratings. He can rewrite them later if his account is ever restored.

Thanks, I have passed that post.

Nice signature, by the way. Reminds me of Shia LaBeouf.

Thanks .

[Brad Harrison]

Is the drama over yet folks?

[snailmen]

Is the drama over yet folks?

Yeah.