Don't you think advertising an obvious scam is pretty untrustworthy behavior H.W.Z......or should I call you lihuajkl, or should I call you hua_hui, or should I call you mezmerizer9, or should I call you chennan?
Remind me to never piss you off again.
When people troll me, more often then not it is an indication that they are a scammer in my experience, so I will look into those who troll me. When I look into someone who is trolling me, and I find scammy behavior, and/or evidence of a previous scam then they will receive negative trust and/or open a scam accusation against them. If I find evidence of shady behavior that might not be worthy of negative trust then I will call them out on such shady behavior (it turns out that HWZ had two accounts enrolled in a signature deal that had a rule against having multiple accounts, and I pointed that out to the operator of the signature campaign). If I am unable to find anything scammy or shady, then I am not going to throw dirt at you until something sticks, and will not leave a negative rating out of spite.
If you have nothing to hide, then feel free to give whatever your opinion of me is (but please at least be professional about it). If you do have something to hide, then you can also give you opinion of me, however if you toll me then I will probably be able to uncover your previous untrustworthy behavior and am very good at doing so.
Any way, back on topic, I hope it is pretty clear who the OP is an alt of, and I think it was pretty sad to see another person create a newbie account and attempt to scam via a loan request shortly after this one was filled
Umm not much clear for me, care to explain?
This thread is pretty clearly a political statement (in support of me), and if the OP wants to reveal his identity then he can do so if he wishes. Those that have spoken to him enough would probably recognize him.
As for you being shady statement, I was talking how the loaners would like other escrow, after your last fiasco.
Like I said previously,
What does escrowing for my alts have to do with my ability to keep your money safe?
I have a solid trading history, and a history of providing an escrow service that my customers have publicly stated they are/were very satisfied with. When terms of a trade that I am asked to escrow would make it impossible to mediate a dispute, I recommend alternate terms that would protect both parties, and would have a high likelihood of being able to resolve a dispute in a fair manor, and when such terms (or other terms that would allow a dispute to be mediated using facts that I can personally verify) are not agreed to then I will decline to escrow a transaction. If the terms of a trade put excessive risk on one party (eg when the instant release of bitcoin would be done after the other party will be receiving a clearly reversible payment), then I will most often explain such risks and suggest alternate terms to somewhat reduce the risk to the party taking the excessive risks. I have been trusted with large amounts of money (both while escrowing and when trading) (amounts that are greater then the aggregate value of trades that many/most people engage in over a year)multiple times, and every time I have been trust with large amounts of money, I have showed that it was appropriate to give me such trust (and the same is true when I have been trusted with smaller amounts of money).
Over the last ~year, I have helped countless people protect themselves against getting scammed, have warned the community about countless numbers of scams, have given countless number of people advice regarding their trading practice, regarding their (giving) trust practices, among other things. Anyone that wants to speak ill of me is really only going to end up embarrassing themselves.
@EthanB - begging is against the rules
