jjshabadoo (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 24, 2012, 10:37:07 PM |
|
I'd love to use P2Pool with my upcoming ASIC miners.
Of course I'm not psyched about configuring it because I suck at software implementation and really just don't like dealing with software.
Anyway, if it's reasonable enough to set up ASIC miners and use P2Pool without penalty, I'll do it.
|
|
|
|
Syke
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 25, 2012, 09:07:42 PM |
|
That'll depend on how the ASIC is designed. If it is designed like the current BFL Single, then it will be a poor p2pool miner. I doubt bASIC and Avalon will have that problem.
|
Buy & Hold
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 25, 2012, 09:55:43 PM |
|
None of the current BFL issues will matter with ASICs on p2pool because they will complete a work item so quickly that aborting work will not matter. Unless BFL do something to completely screw up the communication protocol to their ASIC devices, they will work fine with p2pool.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
jjshabadoo (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 26, 2012, 03:19:31 AM |
|
Awesome and thanks.
I'll be working on moving mine to P2pool after I get them.
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 26, 2012, 05:28:45 AM |
|
There is one caveat though: If p2pool sticks to using getwork for communications instead of stratum, it may be rate limiting...
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
Syke
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 26, 2012, 08:31:15 AM |
|
There is one caveat though: If p2pool sticks to using getwork for communications instead of stratum, it may be rate limiting...
What would be a issue, say for a 54 GH/s miner on today's regular p2pool/bitcoind?
|
Buy & Hold
|
|
|
K1773R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 26, 2012, 10:47:20 AM |
|
I'd love to use P2Pool with my upcoming ASIC miners.
Of course I'm not psyched about configuring it because I suck at software implementation and really just don't like dealing with software.
Anyway, if it's reasonable enough to set up ASIC miners and use P2Pool without penalty, I'll do it.
no problem at all, set ur difficulty to a higher fixed difficulty and thats all https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2Pool
|
[GPG Public Key]BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1 K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM A K1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: N K1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: L Ki773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: E K1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: b K1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 26, 2012, 11:34:59 AM |
|
I'd love to use P2Pool with my upcoming ASIC miners.
Of course I'm not psyched about configuring it because I suck at software implementation and really just don't like dealing with software.
Anyway, if it's reasonable enough to set up ASIC miners and use P2Pool without penalty, I'll do it.
no problem at all, set ur difficulty to a higher fixed difficulty and thats all https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2PoolDon't forget provision of work, not just difficulty targets, and in fact p2pool still expects diff 1 shares, it just tests them all and ignores most of them. So none of the scaleable solutions have really been implemented yet as far as I can see.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
K1773R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 26, 2012, 02:29:54 PM Last edit: October 26, 2012, 02:43:06 PM by K1773R |
|
I'd love to use P2Pool with my upcoming ASIC miners.
Of course I'm not psyched about configuring it because I suck at software implementation and really just don't like dealing with software.
Anyway, if it's reasonable enough to set up ASIC miners and use P2Pool without penalty, I'll do it.
no problem at all, set ur difficulty to a higher fixed difficulty and thats all https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/P2PoolDon't forget provision of work, not just difficulty targets, and in fact p2pool still expects diff 1 shares, it just tests them all and ignores most of them. So none of the scaleable solutions have really been implemented yet as far as I can see. my p2pool is providing work fast enough ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) well, will see how it goes when my ASIC ships ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) EDIT: i gonna take a look at the p2pool source to find a good way to implement it aslong i have time for it.
|
[GPG Public Key]BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1 K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM A K1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: N K1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: L Ki773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: E K1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: b K1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
|
|
|
|