|
DaMut
|
 |
January 26, 2016, 02:51:50 PM |
|
soonnn..
you only can STAKE CUBE on STAKESTICKS.
and then we're going to the MOONN
No, you'll always be able to use whatever operating system you choose yaaahh... we're not going to the moonn. we're goint to the mountain  |
|
|
|
|
MarSas
|
|
January 26, 2016, 03:39:38 PM |
|
Has just one person received the stakestick so far?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arrakeen
|
|
January 26, 2016, 04:04:13 PM |
|
Has just one person received the stakestick so far?
My tacking number says it should arrive today, so hopefully I'll be updating this thread soon  |
|
|
|
|
iGotSpots
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
|
|
January 26, 2016, 07:00:05 PM |
|
Has just one person received the stakestick so far?
No |
|
|
|
iGotSpots
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
|
|
January 26, 2016, 08:09:21 PM |
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
|
|
|
|
|
helmy77
|
|
January 26, 2016, 08:13:09 PM |
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
option 2 |
|
|
|
|
CjMapope
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1092
~Full-Time Minter since 2016~
|
|
January 26, 2016, 08:14:27 PM |
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
imma option 1 kinda guy, just cause i think it curves supply long term a bit better than option 2 ;p |
~Got this girl in my bed, a roof over my head, i mint a couple coins a week, and thats how i make bread~ ~On the 12th day of Hatzvah, OGminer said to me: "compute root of the merkle hash tree!"~ Prohashing -- Simply the best Multipool! |
|
|
bones261
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1827
|
|
January 26, 2016, 08:16:09 PM |
|
I like option 1.
|
|
|
|
|
MickGhee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
Fucker of "the system"
|
|
January 26, 2016, 08:18:51 PM |
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
option 4 revert to a HIpos scheme of 1 coin per block period lol nowthat the coin has been given a platform i think that this will curb inflation. there is allready a good initial supply and slowing inflation to 1 coin per block limits dumping just my 2 cents tho |
Last night, while you were sleeping. I fucked the system!
|
|
|
Texpro
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
January 26, 2016, 08:24:28 PM |
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation) |
|
|
|
|
|
willowfoot
|
|
January 26, 2016, 08:26:40 PM |
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation) Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%? so if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours? how does it maintain 2000%? |
|
|
|
CjMapope
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1092
~Full-Time Minter since 2016~
|
|
January 26, 2016, 08:32:25 PM |
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation) Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%? so if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours? how does it maintain 2000%? "Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%?" good question " if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours? " no-every stake would be a static reward of 10 i believe. the AMOUNT of stakes you would get would prob still be dependant on netweight (correct me if im wrong spots) think like a turbo-clams ;p haha im my eyes option 1 is anywayz ;p |
~Got this girl in my bed, a roof over my head, i mint a couple coins a week, and thats how i make bread~ ~On the 12th day of Hatzvah, OGminer said to me: "compute root of the merkle hash tree!"~ Prohashing -- Simply the best Multipool! |
|
|
MickGhee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
Fucker of "the system"
|
|
January 26, 2016, 08:32:51 PM |
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation) Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%? so if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours? how does it maintain 2000%? pos is very tricky there are many factors to consider |
Last night, while you were sleeping. I fucked the system!
|
|
|
Texpro
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
January 26, 2016, 08:34:28 PM |
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation) Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%? so if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours? how does it maintain 2000%? If 10 CUBE per block compared with 100 CUBE per block then far less inflation the way I am looking at it. So the 2000% will apply for small stakes as the larger stakes will max at 10. Please correct me if I have not got it. |
|
|
|
|
iGotSpots
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
|
|
January 26, 2016, 08:46:16 PM |
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation) Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%? so if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours? how does it maintain 2000%? If 10 CUBE per block compared with 100 CUBE per block then far less inflation the way I am looking at it. So the 2000% will apply for small stakes as the larger stakes will max at 10. Please correct me if I have not got it.Yes |
|
|
|
|
Icefrag
|
|
January 26, 2016, 09:06:01 PM |
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation) Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%? so if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours? how does it maintain 2000%? If 10 CUBE per block compared with 100 CUBE per block then far less inflation the way I am looking at it. So the 2000% will apply for small stakes as the larger stakes will max at 10. Please correct me if I have not got it.Yes Ok, but... If I set inputs less than 10 CUBE, this change will change anything? |
|
|
|
|
iGotSpots
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
|
|
January 26, 2016, 09:06:57 PM |
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation) Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%? so if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours? how does it maintain 2000%? If 10 CUBE per block compared with 100 CUBE per block then far less inflation the way I am looking at it. So the 2000% will apply for small stakes as the larger stakes will max at 10. Please correct me if I have not got it.Yes Ok, but... If I set inputs less than 10 CUBE, this change will change anything? If your stake reward is less than 10 you would still earn the full amount. If it's over 10, it will be set to 10 in this example |
|
|
|
|
willowfoot
|
|
January 26, 2016, 09:07:35 PM |
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
option 4 revert to a HIpos scheme of 1 coin per block period lol nowthat the coin has been given a platform i think that this will curb inflation. there is allready a good initial supply and slowing inflation to 1 coin per block limits dumping just my 2 cents tho I like this thinking, large wallets will still find a way to stake full 2000% encouraging dumping. Curb inflation by bringing the stake rate down ... |
|
|
|
iGotSpots
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1054
CPU Web Mining 🕸️ on webmining.io
|
|
January 26, 2016, 09:08:54 PM |
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
option 4 revert to a HIpos scheme of 1 coin per block period lol nowthat the coin has been given a platform i think that this will curb inflation. there is allready a good initial supply and slowing inflation to 1 coin per block limits dumping just my 2 cents tho I like this thinking, large wallets will still find a way to stake full 2000% encouraging dumping. Curb inflation by bringing the stake rate down ...Not going to happen Large wallets will either stake for the max or have to wait just as long as small wallets do for their inputs to stake if they choose to split down (This change benefits small wallets, not large ones..) |
|
|
|
|
Icefrag
|
|
January 26, 2016, 09:10:56 PM |
|
Leave your opinion below. Not doing a poll because the 3 anti-iGotSpots trolls with thousands of fake names will skew results
1) Cap Stake Rewards at 10 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 10 CUBE, regardless of input size)
2) Cap Stake Rewards at 100 CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is 100 CUBE, regardless of input size)
3) Cap Stake Rewards at ?? CUBE per block while maintaining 2000% stake rate (means the max a block can reward is ?? CUBE, regardless of input size)
- LEAVE YOUR CAP SUGGESTION IN POST
4) Do nothing, leave it as it is
Options 1, 2, and 3 would give a small advantage to small holders and encourage large holders to split their coins up into smaller input sizes
Option 1 (for the reason of lower inflation) Does option 1 really lower inflation if the stake rate remains at 2000%? so if you had 5000 CUBE, you would only stake 10 cube per 24 hours? how does it maintain 2000%? If 10 CUBE per block compared with 100 CUBE per block then far less inflation the way I am looking at it. So the 2000% will apply for small stakes as the larger stakes will max at 10. Please correct me if I have not got it.Yes Ok, but... If I set inputs less than 10 CUBE, this change will change anything? If your stake reward is less than 10 you would still earn the full amount. If it's over 10, it will be set to 10 in this example Ok, i vote for option 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
