RealBitcoin
|
|
December 04, 2015, 04:53:37 PM |
|
None will win, everyone will be affected, everyone will perish were going to lose everything that we hold dear, and for humanity sake don`t ask for WW3
The only difference is, for some of us it will happen a little faster than old age death. All because a few megalomaniacal bankster and politician can't stop aquiring power. But dont worry they will be fine, they build underground cities and fortresses in mountains that will save them from the radiation, and then they can live underground while the whole planet is irradiated, like the filthy worms they are.
|
|
|
|
galdur
|
|
December 04, 2015, 05:14:27 PM |
|
The best way to prevent WW3 is to convince enough people that it will happen for sure. At some point this idea will become oversold, ie. run out of new believers, which means that it will stall, then collapse and won´t happen.
In other words; the more people that believe that there´s a real possibility that WW3 will take place with the nuclear annihilation and all that, the more likely it becomes that serious measures will be taken to conclusively prevent this possibility. It´s just a question of number, a tipping point, thus this oversell notion above.
|
|
|
|
fravia
|
|
December 04, 2015, 06:01:36 PM |
|
its not important who would win the third world war if it will happen anywhere in the future because it would have a lot of negative influence on the world such as deaths and money loss so i guess people have to do everything for this to never happen
|
|
|
|
|
galdur
|
|
December 04, 2015, 11:47:15 PM |
|
US Air Force Weapons Stockpiles Running Low in Anti-Daesh Strike Campaign © AP Photo/ Lefteris Pitarakis, File MIDDLE EAST22:49 04.12.2015(updated 01:42 05.12.2015) The US Air Force has burned through more than 20,000 bombs and missiles in its air campaign against Daesh, also known as ISIL/The Islamic State, and is looking around the world for more weapons and the money to buy them. The ongoing air campaign targeting Daesh fighters and equipment began in August 2014 in Iraq and spread to Syria a month later. "We're in the business of killing terrorists and business is good," Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James said in statement. "We need to replenish our munitions stock. Weapons take years to produce from the day the contract is assigned until they roll off the production line.".... http://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20151204/1031273667/air-force-stockpiles-low-isil.htmlYeah, business is great I´m sure. For those who produce the bombs. I wonder how it averages per terrorist...a million bucks?
|
|
|
|
galdur
|
|
December 05, 2015, 12:43:39 PM |
|
Russia’s defense industry has completed tests of a new flying command center capable of maintaining full control over the country’s armed forces in the event of a global disaster or nuclear war. Russia and the US are the only two nations to possess a command center of this kind. The airborne strategic command center aboard an Ilyushin Il-80 aircraft, a modification of the Il-86 wide-body jet airliner, has successfully completed testing and will be ready for operations by the end of 2015, Russia’s United Instrument Manufacturing Corporation (UIMC) said. The operational deployment of the airborne center is indispensable in situations when there is an absence of ground infrastructure, and in conditions where communications from ground facilities have been disrupted. RT.COM
|
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
|
|
December 05, 2015, 01:02:16 PM |
|
The US Air Force has burned through more than 20,000 bombs and missiles in its air campaign against Daesh, also known as ISIL/The Islamic State, and is looking around the world for more weapons and the money to buy them. I am quite surprised at this. They dropped more than 20,000 bombs and missiles? And according to the pro-American sources, some 4,000 militants have been killed as a result of the American strikes (the real number might be much lower). That is one casualty for every 5 bombs. Looks like 98% of their bombs were being dropped in the desert, where there is no ISIS machinery.
|
|
|
|
BADecker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3948
Merit: 1380
|
|
December 05, 2015, 03:11:27 PM |
|
Russia’s defense industry has completed tests of a new flying command center capable of maintaining full control over the country’s armed forces in the event of a global disaster or nuclear war. Russia and the US are the only two nations to possess a command center of this kind. The airborne strategic command center aboard an Ilyushin Il-80 aircraft, a modification of the Il-86 wide-body jet airliner, has successfully completed testing and will be ready for operations by the end of 2015, Russia’s United Instrument Manufacturing Corporation (UIMC) said. The operational deployment of the airborne center is indispensable in situations when there is an absence of ground infrastructure, and in conditions where communications from ground facilities have been disrupted. RT.COM Barely missed the trees.
|
|
|
|
tn211
|
|
December 05, 2015, 08:46:35 PM |
|
Still no one, because they aren't a World War 3 and I hoping that it won't happen.
If there is a war I don't think it will be Navo agains China and Russian.
|
|
|
|
ridery99 (OP)
|
|
December 05, 2015, 09:35:19 PM |
|
Still no one, because they aren't a World War 3 and I hoping that it won't happen.
If there is a war I don't think it will be Navo agains China and Russian.
Yes Navo will not start war but I think it will be against Nato and Russia.
|
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
|
|
December 06, 2015, 04:24:01 AM |
|
Yes Navo will not start war but I think it will be against Nato and Russia.
Nope. NATO and Russia will never fight each other directly. They will fight using proxies, as they have done in Georgia, Ukraine, Syria.etc. Both the NATO and Russia is not in a position to wage a major war right now. If such a confrontation occurs, then it will completely ruin both the sides, even before a definite outcome is reached.
|
|
|
|
zivone
|
|
December 06, 2015, 04:27:24 AM |
|
I will not vote because no one will win. The winners would be only those privileged people who can protect their lives and living.
|
|
|
|
ridery99 (OP)
|
|
December 06, 2015, 07:13:06 AM |
|
Yes Navo will not start war but I think it will be against Nato and Russia.
Nope. NATO and Russia will never fight each other directly. They will fight using proxies, as they have done in Georgia, Ukraine, Syria.etc. Both the NATO and Russia is not in a position to wage a major war right now. If such a confrontation occurs, then it will completely ruin both the sides, even before a definite outcome is reached. Sweden might be a good proxy.
|
|
|
|
hunnaryb
|
|
December 06, 2015, 07:44:15 AM |
|
Still no one, because they aren't a World War 3 and I hoping that it won't happen.
If there is a war I don't think it will be Navo agains China and Russian.
Nobody wants ww3 right now. It'll be nukes and the whole world will be killed off.
|
▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇
| | | |
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1217
|
|
December 06, 2015, 08:41:26 AM |
|
Yes Navo will not start war but I think it will be against Nato and Russia.
Nope. NATO and Russia will never fight each other directly. They will fight using proxies, as they have done in Georgia, Ukraine, Syria.etc. Both the NATO and Russia is not in a position to wage a major war right now. If such a confrontation occurs, then it will completely ruin both the sides, even before a definite outcome is reached. Sweden might be a good proxy. Sweden? No. I don't think so. Swedes value the lives of their countrymen, unlike those in Ukraine and Georgia. They are very unlikely to pick a fight with Russia. The ideal proxy will be a country such as Ukraine, which can easily afford the deaths of 10,000 or even 100,000 soldiers. If the same number of deaths occur in Sweden, the government will go down.
|
|
|
|
ridery99 (OP)
|
|
December 06, 2015, 10:15:18 AM |
|
Yes Navo will not start war but I think it will be against Nato and Russia.
Nope. NATO and Russia will never fight each other directly. They will fight using proxies, as they have done in Georgia, Ukraine, Syria.etc. Both the NATO and Russia is not in a position to wage a major war right now. If such a confrontation occurs, then it will completely ruin both the sides, even before a definite outcome is reached. Sweden might be a good proxy. Sweden? No. I don't think so. Swedes value the lives of their countrymen, unlike those in Ukraine and Georgia. They are very unlikely to pick a fight with Russia. The ideal proxy will be a country such as Ukraine, which can easily afford the deaths of 10,000 or even 100,000 soldiers. If the same number of deaths occur in Sweden, the government will go down. But Sweden will join Nato soon
|
|
|
|
galdur
|
|
December 06, 2015, 10:15:44 AM |
|
Yes Navo will not start war but I think it will be against Nato and Russia.
Nope. NATO and Russia will never fight each other directly. They will fight using proxies, as they have done in Georgia, Ukraine, Syria.etc. Both the NATO and Russia is not in a position to wage a major war right now. If such a confrontation occurs, then it will completely ruin both the sides, even before a definite outcome is reached. Sweden might be a good proxy. Sweden? No. I don't think so. Swedes value the lives of their countrymen, unlike those in Ukraine and Georgia. They are very unlikely to pick a fight with Russia. The ideal proxy will be a country such as Ukraine, which can easily afford the deaths of 10,000 or even 100,000 soldiers. If the same number of deaths occur in Sweden, the government will go down. Sweden and Finland may do some small dog yapping for the NATO doghouse and probably have some sabre rattling for appearances sake. These countries have good soldiers and equipment, what little is of it, but really the last thing they´re interested in is using them en masse in war and definitely not against big bear Russia.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
December 06, 2015, 10:33:19 AM |
|
Sweden and Finland may do some small dog yapping for the NATO doghouse and probably have some sabre rattling for appearances sake. These countries have good soldiers and equipment, what little is of it, but really the last thing they´re interested in is using them en masse in war and definitely not against big bear Russia.
I bet they still remember https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Neva...
|
|
|
|
galdur
|
|
December 06, 2015, 10:42:54 AM |
|
Sweden and Finland may do some small dog yapping for the NATO doghouse and probably have some sabre rattling for appearances sake. These countries have good soldiers and equipment, what little is of it, but really the last thing they´re interested in is using them en masse in war and definitely not against big bear Russia.
I bet they still remember https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_on_the_Ice... Sweden used to have dreams of empire and had some very fierce warlord kings that led from the front but it was too costly both in lives and funds so they gave up on that and took the much more sensible and profitable course, manufacturing weapons for other peoples´wars. I suspect that they themselves bumped off Gustav Adolph and Charles, much more likely the latter, to try to stop the hopeless wars.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
December 06, 2015, 10:45:48 AM |
|
Sweden used to have dreams of empire and had some very fierce warlord kings but it was too costly both in lives and funds so they gave up on that and took the much more sensible and profitable course, manufacturing weapons for other peoples´wars.
First humankind used weapons, then economics. Now it uses culture it seems, just look what happens in Europe.
|
|
|
|
|