Who will win WW3?

[bryant.coleman]

This is crucial! And if you can count on endless human resources you really have power. Plus they have nuclear weapons, in future many things will not be decided without China's approvals. Today we have 3 major world forces, rest are regional forces.

No. I disagree with you. Military technology has advanced to such an extent that manpower no longer count as an important factor during the warfare. There is no point in having a multi-million army, if 90% of it can be wiped out in a matter of few seconds using tactical nuclear weapons. And as I pointed out earlier, China no longer has an endless pool of human resource (thanks to the one-child policy).

[trenchflaint]

This is crucial! And if you can count on endless human resources you really have power. Plus they have nuclear weapons, in future many things will not be decided without China's approvals. Today we have 3 major world forces, rest are regional forces.

No. I disagree with you. Military technology has advanced to such an extent that manpower no longer count as an important factor during the warfare. There is no point in having a multi-million army, if 90% of it can be wiped out in a matter of few seconds using tactical nuclear weapons. And as I pointed out earlier, China no longer has an endless pool of human resource (thanks to the one-child policy).

You are correct about this,there is really no use of having a lot of militia forces marching when they can be wiped out in just one hit.
Todays war will be decided by technology which will decrease the casualty of any country.

[iqlimasyadiqa]

there will be no winner because WW3 will never happen. The world is already aware that the war only cause damage and loss, both physically and materially. no one will want to feel what is happening in WW1 and WW2. all will live a happy, safe and peaceful. who want only people who did not appreciate his own life. 

[arbitrage]

No. I disagree with you. Military technology has advanced to such an extent that manpower no longer count as an important factor during the warfare. There is no point in having a multi-million army, if 90% of it can be wiped out in a matter of few seconds using tactical nuclear weapons. And as I pointed out earlier, China no longer has an endless pool of human resource (thanks to the one-child policy).

They probably faking  this numbers, like everything else. Don't forget socialism will never be sincere to west, and this is fact! East and west are enemies and much of truth is fabricated on both sides

[JustDie]

the simple is

russia + China = Nuclear war , no Mercy  + NATO = dust

so the winner is russia LOL

it just my Opinion

[Gronthaing]

No. I disagree with you. Military technology has advanced to such an extent that manpower no longer count as an important factor during the warfare. There is no point in having a multi-million army, if 90% of it can be wiped out in a matter of few seconds using tactical nuclear weapons. And as I pointed out earlier, China no longer has an endless pool of human resource (thanks to the one-child policy).

They probably faking  this numbers, like everything else. Don't forget socialism will never be sincere to west, and this is fact! East and west are enemies and much of truth is fabricated on both sides

What does socialism have to do with it? Doesn't socialism exist in the west too? In some countries more others less. Though none had workers control of production or anything like it. In the east or the west.

This is crucial! And if you can count on endless human resources you really have power. Plus they have nuclear weapons, in future many things will not be decided without China's approvals. Today we have 3 major world forces, rest are regional forces.

No. I disagree with you. Military technology has advanced to such an extent that manpower no longer count as an important factor during the warfare. There is no point in having a multi-million army, if 90% of it can be wiped out in a matter of few seconds using tactical nuclear weapons. And as I pointed out earlier, China no longer has an endless pool of human resource (thanks to the one-child policy).

You are correct about this,there is really no use of having a lot of militia forces marching when they can be wiped out in just one hit.
Todays war will be decided by technology which will decrease the casualty of any country.

Don't know about decreasing casualties. Maybe strong countries don't fight each other directly. But proxy wars are many times more bloody. Sanctions destroy entire countries. And indirectly cause many deaths. Like what happened in iraq for example. And how many more people died in drone strikes than we know about? It maybe cheaper to wage war with technology. But I don't know it saves more lives.

[galdur]

Hillary Clinton Email Archive

On March 16, 2016 WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive for 30,322 emails & email attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton's private email server while she was Secretary of State. The 50,547 pages of documents span from 30 June 2010 to 12 August 2014. 7,570 of the documents were sent by Hillary Clinton. The emails were made available in the form of thousands of PDFs by the US State Department as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request. The final PDFs were made available on February 29, 2016.

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/

[magnific61]

Hillary Clinton Email Archive

On March 16, 2016 WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive for 30,322 emails & email attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton's private email server while she was Secretary of State. The 50,547 pages of documents span from 30 June 2010 to 12 August 2014. 7,570 of the documents were sent by Hillary Clinton. The emails were made available in the form of thousands of PDFs by the US State Department as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request. The final PDFs were made available on February 29, 2016.

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/

Wikileaks carries through well its mission against democrats. One force wants republicians win the elections

[galdur]

Hillary Clinton Email Archive

On March 16, 2016 WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive for 30,322 emails & email attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton's private email server while she was Secretary of State. The 50,547 pages of documents span from 30 June 2010 to 12 August 2014. 7,570 of the documents were sent by Hillary Clinton. The emails were made available in the form of thousands of PDFs by the US State Department as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request. The final PDFs were made available on February 29, 2016.

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/

Wikileaks carries through well its mission against democrats. One force wants republicians win the elections

I don´t know; personally if I was in the leak business I´d focus on morons that can´t maintain elementary security. It pretty much seems to go without saying, you go for the weak or absent defenses.

[arwin100]

Obviously theres no winner on war all are losers becoz all lose their life assets. Environment builds and economy is destroy by war and especially human life. Better to have a good disscussion than to declare a war.

[n0ne]

World war 3 won't take place as people have realized the value of human life. Only people who consider battle field as business ground promote war.

[Risackwpsp]

LOL, even Russion and China combine, they can't campare to USA.

[Jstalk]

You forgot about India.The future most populated country in the world(China in second place)...
The Asian union should be Russia,China,India....

[Gronthaing]

You forgot about India.The future most populated country in the world(China in second place)...
The Asian union should be Russia,China,India....

India and china have some problems to solve first. They had 3 wars between them not a long time ago. There are border disputes. Some say chinese military repeatedly cross into indian territory. And india doesn't like the strong relations between china and pakistan. With more time maybe they will grow closer.

[galdur]

The next time you go out look around and check out the recruitment material. Does it look very promising? Then think who can win freakin world war three  

[Losvienleg]

This is crucial! And if you can count on endless human resources you really have power. Plus they have nuclear weapons, in future many things will not be decided without China's approvals. Today we have 3 major world forces, rest are regional forces.

No. I disagree with you. Military technology has advanced to such an extent that manpower no longer count as an important factor during the warfare. There is no point in having a multi-million army, if 90% of it can be wiped out in a matter of few seconds using tactical nuclear weapons. And as I pointed out earlier, China no longer has an endless pool of human resource (thanks to the one-child policy).

No, the man count is much more important. That's not your teleguidated bombs that take a city, but brave men. Who drive the tanks ? Men, not robots.

[For_real_for]

No one really wins a world war..

[magnific61]

Nobody considers Islamic Army includes 38 states.

[Zeke2345]

Could see a proxy war getting out of hand but besides that no Country wants to go full out war.
China may push boundaries but they frequently will back down to pressure and are just testing the limits.
India and Pakistan have tit for tat forever and it has not boiled over.
The only real threat is homegrown Muslim extremists and that would most likely be dealt with on a global front by everyone.

[Losvienleg]

No one really wins a world war..

Stop repeting the same shit that the pacifist medias told you ! There's always a winner in a war. The WW2 crowned the USA, and the next one will destroy them !