And it is always a tricky balancing act as I said,,, it is easy to have an idea that should work in theory but much more difficult to work it out and experiment till you get it right, so yeah, I agree. They have done very well for them and for us:)
I believe there should be options given out, making decisions of investors money without asking investors doesn't sound too good. Plus when there is a company that sells its shares to other people the shareholders could get together and use that 51% of the shares to kick the CEO out and appoint another one, which is a very democratic thing if you ask me in a company ruling type of way.
Here investors are the ones spending all the money, bitvest literally loses ZERO because they are not spending even marketing now, and yet somehow they are still in control and doing whatever they want without asking first. Certainly they should be in control but at least ask people if they want to pay for the ads or not, or promotions or whatever, that is at least the decent thing to do, ask.
[/quote]
I kind of agree with you here,,, but to be fair to Bitvest, they did give us investors 1 week period of notice of what they were planning to do. Basically, they said this was how it was going to be now, and you were free to pull out your investment if you did not like the way things were planned.
BV is a centralized company so we have to accept that, nobody forced us to invest:) I invest in two casino bankrolls now and am very happy with both, but I have to accept they will change the rules as they want, I can choose any time to leave if I do not like it:)