chrisvl
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1006
Trainman
|
 |
November 08, 2015, 11:11:46 AM |
|
I have write this before i will write it again. It seems that the business ecosystem around bitcoin are desperate to take control of the source code of it with their own developers etc. This is a fight for the soul of bitcoin. And it is clear who is with them like Roger Ver, Mike Hearn, Gavin Andressen and many more.
You are wrong,there is a problem and in my opinion only XT is a serious proposal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 08, 2015, 11:19:27 AM |
|
I have write this before i will write it again. It seems that the business ecosystem around bitcoin are desperate to take control of the source code of it with their own developers etc. This is a fight for the soul of bitcoin. And it is clear who is with them like Roger Ver, Mike Hearn, Gavin Andressen and many more.
You are wrong,there is a problem and in my opinion only XT is a serious proposal you'll be forking off soon then. january here we come!  |
|
|
|
|
mayax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1004
|
|
November 08, 2015, 01:42:48 PM |
|
Forking = THE END of Bitcoin Forking = people will migrate to an ALTcoin (like XT). You can do that now. You don't have to wait until January.There are plenty of Alt coins |
|
|
|
|
mezzomix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1252
|
|
November 08, 2015, 02:14:43 PM |
|
Forking = THE END of Bitcoin
Only for those who follow the fork. We others will be much better without them.  |
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 08, 2015, 02:21:32 PM
Last edit: November 08, 2015, 03:01:47 PM by hdbuck |
|
Forking = THE END of Bitcoin
Only for those who follow the fork. We others will be much better without them. Indeed, no need to keep them braindamaged corporatists redditard whatnots into bitcoin, pretending they represent its community somehow, and whilst using socialist pseudo democratic brigading & voting mechanism to impose their shitty govcoin. Fork them parasites into oblivion already. |
|
|
|
|
|
meono
|
|
November 08, 2015, 02:30:18 PM |
|
Forking = THE END of BitcoinForking = people will migrate to an ALTcoin (like XT). You can do that now. You don't have to wait until January.There are plenty of Alt coins can you be any more stupid? |
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 08, 2015, 02:30:58 PM |
|
Forking = THE END of BitcoinForking = people will migrate to an ALTcoin (like XT). You can do that now. You don't have to wait until January.There are plenty of Alt coins can you be any more stupid? you surely can. |
|
|
|
|
chrisvl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1006
Trainman
|
|
November 08, 2015, 02:53:40 PM |
|
Forking = THE END of Bitcoin Forking = people will migrate to an ALTcoin (like XT). You can do that now. You don't have to wait until January.There are plenty of Alt coins you think a fork can kill bitcoin ? |
|
|
|
|
vodaljepa
|
|
November 08, 2015, 03:03:34 PM |
|
Forking = THE END of Bitcoin Forking = people will migrate to an ALTcoin (like XT). You can do that now. You don't have to wait until January.There are plenty of Alt coins you think a fork can kill bitcoin ? Yes if enough people switch over to the new blockchain |
|
|
|
chek2fire
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1142
Intergalactic Conciliator
|
|
November 09, 2015, 12:43:22 AM |
|
Forking = THE END of Bitcoin Forking = people will migrate to an ALTcoin (like XT). You can do that now. You don't have to wait until January.There are plenty of Alt coins you think a fork can kill bitcoin ? i think yes. We will be a economical disaster for bitcoin and will create a chaos in value of bitcoin. There will be some months maybe years with two sepearate bitcoin that will run together. Don be so sure that one part or another will accept to join the fork even it has the 75 or 80% mining power. To fork bitcoin is not about miners as Gavin and Hearn think but is very very complex situation. Take a look and this great video lecture from coursera for this matter. https://youtu.be/AikLs1P4_PA |
|
|
|
StateOfAffairs
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
November 09, 2015, 01:01:02 AM |
|
Who is Brian Armstrong in the grand scheme of things?
|
|
|
|
|
mayax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1004
|
|
November 09, 2015, 01:04:00 AM |
|
It seems to me that there is a new round of Bitcoin XT debate coming to us as the end of the year is nearing. I am sure that propaganda will do its job!
Brian Armstrong (aka Coinbase) and 99% BTC media belongs to some morons called "the shit elite"(Coinbase, Bitstamp, BTC china, OKcoin, Ripple, Bitfinex = all these have the same shareholders). So, the propaganda is about to begin. |
|
|
|
|
HostFat
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1203
I support freedom of choice
|
|
November 09, 2015, 01:19:23 AM |
|
Brian Armstrong (aka Coinbase) and 99% BTC media belongs to some morons called "the shit elite"(Coinbase, Bitstamp, BTC china, OKcoin, Ripple, Bitfinex = all these have the same shareholders).
Ripple lol. Ripple takes space over Bitcoin every time it (Bitcoin) doesn't offer a good result to his customers. How can you put it with them?  |
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 09, 2015, 01:38:59 AM |
|
Brian Armstrong (aka Coinbase) and 99% BTC media belongs to some morons called "the shit elite"(Coinbase, Bitstamp, BTC china, OKcoin, Ripple, Bitfinex = all these have the same shareholders).
Ripple lol. Ripple takes space over Bitcoin every time it (Bitcoin) doesn't offer a good result to his customers. How can you put it with them? ripple offers already all the centralization and free loading mass transaction bullshit you seem to care for. so why you still here? |
|
|
|
|
chek2fire
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1142
Intergalactic Conciliator
|
|
November 09, 2015, 02:08:19 AM |
|
Brian Armstrong (aka Coinbase) and 99% BTC media belongs to some morons called "the shit elite"(Coinbase, Bitstamp, BTC china, OKcoin, Ripple, Bitfinex = all these have the same shareholders).
Ripple lol. Ripple takes space over Bitcoin every time it (Bitcoin) doesn't offer a good result to his customers. How can you put it with them? ripple offers already all the centralization and free loading mass transaction bullshit you seem to care for. so why you still here? because this is their hidden agenda. To transform bitcoin to a new ripple system |
|
|
|
HostFat
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1203
I support freedom of choice
|
|
November 09, 2015, 02:21:09 AM |
|
because this is their hidden agenda. To transform bitcoin to a new ripple system
Have you just read how does it works Liquid? Some of you clearly live in fantasy world. |
|
|
|
chek2fire
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1142
Intergalactic Conciliator
|
|
November 09, 2015, 02:30:03 AM |
|
and some of you it seems that will never let to change this financial system world...I cant understand if you want a digital banking system with central bank etc why are you involved in bitcoin?
|
|
|
|
HostFat
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4214
Merit: 1203
I support freedom of choice
|
|
November 09, 2015, 02:41:48 AM |
|
You didn't answer to my question.
Maybe you even don't know what it is Liquid, and then it even more funny when you claim that BIP101 is something that is pushing Bitcoin to be more like Ripple.
|
|
|
|
Nagle
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 09, 2015, 09:17:28 AM |
|
Unless a node is doing mining, why should it limit the block size? Block size is determined by what the majority of miners accept. Other nodes are just slaves of the miners.
|
|
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1075
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
|
November 09, 2015, 09:27:26 AM |
|
Unless a node is doing mining, why should it limit the block size? Block size is determined by what the majority of miners accept. Other nodes are just slaves of the miners.
It is called validation because if some peer you are connected to you is going to start throwing huge blocks at you then they are chewing up your bandwidth with rubbish (same as sending you huge txs with no fees, etc.). Full nodes will necessarily perform such validation in order to reduce potential DoS attacks (am surprised that you hadn't already realised this). For SPV usage there is much less validation going on (which is why SPV mining is such a bad idea). |
|
|
|
|
