|
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
OmegaStarScream
Staff
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3458
Merit: 6099
|
 |
November 04, 2015, 07:49:18 PM |
|
I don't think so , if it was Double spend Blockchain.info should show a message about it .
As you can see it says Medium Priority , when you put the cursor on that sign near it , it will tell you that you paid inferior fees then the recommended ones and that was the reason of the delay , so you need to wait . In case it never gets confirmed money may just get back to the owner . Still ... don't trust 0 confirmation transactions .
|
|
|
|
ajareselde
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin
|
|
November 04, 2015, 07:51:03 PM |
|
That transaction looks like a bunch of small inputs transacted into one address, which shouldn't be malicious by itself.
Can you give more info about who was supposed to escrow, what etc. Looking at the size of the fee, i'm surprised it still didn't confirm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ProfessionalGoogler (OP)
|
|
November 04, 2015, 07:51:23 PM |
|
I don't think so , if it was Double spend Blockchain.info should show a message about it .
As you can see it says Medium Priority , when you put the cursor on that sign near it , it will tell you that you paid inferior fees then the recommended ones and that was the reason of the delay , so you need to wait . In case it never gets confirmed money may just get back to the owner . Still ... don't trust 0 confirmation transactions .
Idk escrow claims funny stuff might be going on and that he is no longer watching this, suggesting it will not confirm. |
|
|
|
|
|
ProfessionalGoogler (OP)
|
|
November 04, 2015, 07:53:27 PM |
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1193388.0That transaction looks like a bunch of small inputs transacted into one address, which shouldn't be malicious by itself.
Can you give more info about who was supposed to escrow, what etc. Looking at the size of the fee, i'm surprised it still didn't confirm.
|
|
|
|
|
OmegaStarScream
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3458
Merit: 6099
|
|
November 04, 2015, 07:57:41 PM |
|
I don't think so , if it was Double spend Blockchain.info should show a message about it .
As you can see it says Medium Priority , when you put the cursor on that sign near it , it will tell you that you paid inferior fees then the recommended ones and that was the reason of the delay , so you need to wait . In case it never gets confirmed money may just get back to the owner . Still ... don't trust 0 confirmation transactions .
Idk escrow claims funny stuff might be going on and that he is no longer watching this, suggesting it will not confirm. Looking at the adress I'd say it's OgNasty ? he is a trusted member as far as I know so there is nothing to worry about on that part , same goes for your items I guess ? I mean you didn't ship anything right ? so if that transaction don't get confirmed you simply don't send anything and that's it , you try to find another serious buyer to sell your goods . |
|
|
|
|
ProfessionalGoogler (OP)
|
|
November 04, 2015, 07:59:17 PM |
|
I don't think so , if it was Double spend Blockchain.info should show a message about it .
As you can see it says Medium Priority , when you put the cursor on that sign near it , it will tell you that you paid inferior fees then the recommended ones and that was the reason of the delay , so you need to wait . In case it never gets confirmed money may just get back to the owner . Still ... don't trust 0 confirmation transactions .
Idk escrow claims funny stuff might be going on and that he is no longer watching this, suggesting it will not confirm. Looking at the adress I'd say it's OgNasty ? he is a trusted member as far as I know so there is nothing to worry about on that part , same goes for your items I guess ? I mean you didn't ship anything right ? so if that transaction don't get confirmed you simply don't send anything and that's it , you try to find another serious buyer to sell your goods . Looking at the fee that was included and the address' history of what appears to be multiple double spend attempts, I am not going to follow this transaction anymore.
Let me know if it ever confirms (it won't). ProfessionalGoogler, if you wanted to create a scam accusation, this address is all the proof you need: 17YEaLjrxygTBtm2aRgPmLvm8neUTkWmie
Please don't ask me any questions or debate this with me. I don't want to waste any more time on this.
|
|
|
|
|
ajareselde
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin
|
|
November 04, 2015, 08:02:38 PM |
|
There's another unconfirmed transaction from those inputs ( https://blockchain.info/tx/5d331af8fb81f39cdd95db47dbc9a7329016122fd9863a57492ca088e430a2ff) and it sure does look fishy. Under no circumstances take it seriously if it doesnt atleast have few confirmations. I would search for another buyer in the meantime, and if this does confirm, ognasty will surely return it to the sender if there's no trade. |
|
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4200
Merit: 4442
|
|
November 04, 2015, 08:03:55 PM |
|
https://blockchain.info/tx/5d331af8fb81f39cdd95db47dbc9a7329016122fd9863a57492ca088e430a2ff?show_adv=trueseems the originating funds do not total the 4btc+ needed.. plus another 4btc was tx's within 3 hours, which again looks to not have enough funds..
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
achow101
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3374
Merit: 6535
Just writing some code
|
|
November 04, 2015, 08:57:06 PM |
|
It is a large transaction with a small fee. It is over 25 Kb. A good enough fee for that should be at least 0.0025 BTC, but the fee is only 0.0008, which is too small for a transaction of that size. It should confirm eventually. If the money is going to you, you could attempt a CPFP transaction to get it to confirm faster, or you can just wait for it to confirm normally.
|
|
|
|
ajareselde
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1000
Satoshi is rolling in his grave. #bitcoin
|
|
November 04, 2015, 09:46:35 PM |
|
It is a large transaction with a small fee. It is over 25 Kb. A good enough fee for that should be at least 0.0025 BTC, but the fee is only 0.0008, which is too small for a transaction of that size. It should confirm eventually. If the money is going to you, you could attempt a CPFP transaction to get it to confirm faster, or you can just wait for it to confirm normally.
Regardless of the fee, by my count also the originating address doesn't seam to have enough funds to cover all of the outputs. I doubt it will even get confirmed. |
|
|
|
|
achow101
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3374
Merit: 6535
Just writing some code
|
|
November 04, 2015, 09:51:14 PM |
|
It is a large transaction with a small fee. It is over 25 Kb. A good enough fee for that should be at least 0.0025 BTC, but the fee is only 0.0008, which is too small for a transaction of that size. It should confirm eventually. If the money is going to you, you could attempt a CPFP transaction to get it to confirm faster, or you can just wait for it to confirm normally.
Regardless of the fee, by my count also the originating address doesn't seam to have enough funds to cover all of the outputs. I doubt it will even get confirmed. That is not at all possible. No wallet would allow that, no node would relay the transaction, and blockchain.info would not accept that nor display the transaction. Your math is wrong. |
|
|
|
|
ProfessionalGoogler (OP)
|
|
November 04, 2015, 11:03:46 PM |
|
It is a large transaction with a small fee. It is over 25 Kb. A good enough fee for that should be at least 0.0025 BTC, but the fee is only 0.0008, which is too small for a transaction of that size. It should confirm eventually. If the money is going to you, you could attempt a CPFP transaction to get it to confirm faster, or you can just wait for it to confirm normally.
Regardless of the fee, by my count also the originating address doesn't seam to have enough funds to cover all of the outputs. I doubt it will even get confirmed. That is not at all possible. No wallet would allow that, no node would relay the transaction, and blockchain.info would not accept that nor display the transaction. Your math is wrong. Looking at the fee that was included and the address' history of what appears to be multiple double spend attempts, I am not going to follow this transaction anymore.
Let me know if it ever confirms (it won't). ProfessionalGoogler, if you wanted to create a scam accusation, this address is all the proof you need: 17YEaLjrxygTBtm2aRgPmLvm8neUTkWmie
Please don't ask me any questions or debate this with me. I don't want to waste any more time on this.
|
|
|
|
|
achow101
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3374
Merit: 6535
Just writing some code
|
|
November 04, 2015, 11:13:21 PM |
|
It is a large transaction with a small fee. It is over 25 Kb. A good enough fee for that should be at least 0.0025 BTC, but the fee is only 0.0008, which is too small for a transaction of that size. It should confirm eventually. If the money is going to you, you could attempt a CPFP transaction to get it to confirm faster, or you can just wait for it to confirm normally.
Regardless of the fee, by my count also the originating address doesn't seam to have enough funds to cover all of the outputs. I doubt it will even get confirmed. That is not at all possible. No wallet would allow that, no node would relay the transaction, and blockchain.info would not accept that nor display the transaction. Your math is wrong. Looking at the fee that was included and the address' history of what appears to be multiple double spend attempts, I am not going to follow this transaction anymore.
Let me know if it ever confirms (it won't). ProfessionalGoogler, if you wanted to create a scam accusation, this address is all the proof you need: 17YEaLjrxygTBtm2aRgPmLvm8neUTkWmie
Please don't ask me any questions or debate this with me. I don't want to waste any more time on this.
Well I think it will confirm. There is no indication that there is a double spend yet. |
|
|
|
tazdas
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 10
|
|
November 05, 2015, 12:21:07 AM |
|
I am the one who sent the 2 payments..
My first payment was sent to Bitmain for an S7.
and the second one to OGnasty for escrow for
My bitcoin client = v0.10.2 Bit coin core.
Can somebody please help me figure out how to get confirmations.
I have sent payment to various ppl on the forum without any problems
|
|
|
|
|
tazdas
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 10
|
|
November 05, 2015, 12:22:13 AM |
|
ProfessionalGoogler, i can assure there is no scam.
you have my address and phone so if you like we can talk as well.
|
|
|
|
|
tazdas
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 10
|
|
November 05, 2015, 03:56:37 AM |
|
I have asked for help in the below thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=232979.new#newI chose the default fees that was asked uisng the quick payment method by bitcoin core client, and never knew this will casue me so much headache. In the past, paymenst with default fees used to get confirmed in 2-4 hrs.. Based on some of the comments above, I may just have to wait |
|
|
|
|
tazdas
Member
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 10
|
|
November 05, 2015, 05:39:17 PM |
|
Ok so looks like both of my transactions in questioin here now have confirmations .
Should be all ok now
|
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1011
|
|
November 05, 2015, 05:47:19 PM |
|
My bitcoin client = v0.10.2 Bit coin core.
You are the problem, bro ...  |
|
|
|
|
max1972
Member
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 10
|
|
November 05, 2015, 06:10:23 PM |
|
Пoдcкaжитe пoжaлyйcтa! Пepeвeл мoнeты (кoмиccию нe включил), yжe двoe cyтoк виcит в cтaтyce HEПOДTBEPЖДEHHAЯ TPAHЗAКЦИЯ! Ceйчac пoнимaю чтo этo из зa oтcyтcтвия кoмиccии... Ecли в тeчeнии 2 cyтoк тpaнзaкция нe пoдтвepдитcя, тo пpocтo пoтepяю эти дeньги (cтaвкa нa BITBET). пoдcкaжитe пoжaлyйcтa, чтo в мoeм cлyчae мoжнo cдeлaть? мoжнo ли кaк тo дoплaтить кoмиccию тeпepь или yжe пoзднo? 085fbe005ba130d926b5f2cd55516d0c705f70448dc9cd427e668f3c7ec98ca6
|
|
|
|
|
|
