[Announce] [NSFW] Bitcoin Babes - Pay Per View - No Login

[Alex Beckenham]

I'm not sure if I'm allowed to post NSFW stuff here, but here goes...

Bitcoin Babes - bitcoinbabes.com

(That's the text-only version of the banner; There's a sexier banner at http://bitcoinbabes.com/images/bitcoinbabes2.png)

Not much to explain about this site... anyone can view all the thumbnails, multiple pages, then if you want to view an image full size it's 0.01 btc.

There are zero confirmations required on your spend, so your balance should update in just a few seconds usually.

It only has 20 or so pics at the moment, but if there are no issues with it over the next 24 hours, I'll be uploading a couple of thousand.

Enjoy!

[Nefario]

Someones complained about this, but I can't see anything wrong with it, it's in the marketplace and not showing any ...skin.

[Findeton]

So porn finally arrives to bitcoin!

[IIOII]

So porn finally arrives to bitcoin!

We should celebrate this event, as porn industry has always been the front-runner in adoption of new technologies... 

[Alex Beckenham]

So porn finally arrives to bitcoin!

We should celebrate this event, as porn industry has always been the front-runner in adoption of new technologies... 

I would love for you to celebrate the opening of my new website, but I must inform you that it is definitely not the first for bitcoin porn

Although it is perhaps a first for pay per image bitcoin porn.

[Findeton]

So porn finally arrives to bitcoin!

We should celebrate this event, as porn industry has always been the front-runner in adoption of new technologies... 

Let's call some porn stars and do a party! 

[ploum]

Although it is perhaps a first for pay per image bitcoin porn.

But do you have any rights on those pictures? A tineye search show plenty of results for those pictures.

[Alex Beckenham]

Although it is perhaps a first for pay per image bitcoin porn.

But do you have any rights on those pictures? A tineye search show plenty of results for those pictures.

I've specifically chosen images where copyright is unknown and/or unclaimed (i.e. Mostly amateur/selfshot). If any copyright holders of images on my website wish to be compensated, they are more than welcome to contact me.

The plan is later to add premium content which would be done exclusively for my site, but I need to work out if the price can be justified first.

[Nefario]

We're going to have every girl in a third world country with a webcam putting questionable picks of themselves up here. 

[Alex Beckenham]

We're going to have every girl in a third world country with a webcam putting questionable picks of themselves up here.  

How would they do that? The premium content would be done by professional models in Sydney, Australia.

[cunicula]

I like Nefario's proposed business model. Currently, third world girl naked webcam uses VISA/MC (see livejasmin.com). Apparently, this single site is around the 50th most visited site on the web.
Bitcoin would allow lower transaction and setup costs, and superior anonymity for customers. Hopefully, the girls could obtain a larger fraction of the money.

Unlike pictures and video, webcams do not have to compete with an enormous volume of free content.

[realnowhereman]

But do you have any rights on those pictures? A tineye search show plenty of results for those pictures.

I've specifically chosen images where copyright is unknown and/or unclaimed (i.e. Mostly amateur/selfshot). If any copyright holders of images on my website wish to be compensated, they are more than welcome to contact me.
[/quote]

You do know that there is no need to claim copyright?  Everything has copyright, it's actually incredibly hard to disclaim copyright.

You are without doubt infringing the copyright of every photographer who's pictures you are using without permission.   Saying "if they want recompense they can contact me" is not reasonable.  You might as well steal cars and say "the owner can contact me if they want a rental fee".

[lemonginger]

I'd critique the morality of your business model but I cannot imagine pay per image porn will be a viable business model as anything but a shortlived bitcoin curiosity, so have at it.

[bitcredit]

I've specifically chosen images where copyright is unknown and/or unclaimed (i.e. Mostly amateur/selfshot). If any copyright holders of images on my website wish to be compensated, they are more than welcome to contact me.

The plan is later to add premium content which would be done exclusively for my site, but I need to work out if the price can be justified first.

So basically you're displaying pornographic pictures of women you don't know, without their permission, for profit. Someone ought to make you the star of an amateur snuff scene. I'd pay top dollar to see it!

[Nefario]

I'd pay top dollar to see it!

Sorry bitcoin only.

[Alex Beckenham]

I've specifically chosen images where copyright is unknown and/or unclaimed (i.e. Mostly amateur/selfshot). If any copyright holders of images on my website wish to be compensated, they are more than welcome to contact me.

The plan is later to add premium content which would be done exclusively for my site, but I need to work out if the price can be justified first.

So basically you're displaying pornographic pictures of women you don't know, without their permission, for profit. Someone ought to make you the star of an amateur snuff scene. I'd pay top dollar to see it!

So basically you'd like to watch a video of me being murdered, simply because we have differing views on copyright laws?

God, I love the internet

[marcus_of_augustus]

So women have finally discovered bitcoin?

[realnowhereman]

So basically you'd like to watch a video of me being murdered, simply because we have differing views on copyright laws?

God, I love the internet

The murder thing is obviously rhetoric.  However, it matters not one jot what your views are on copyright.  Mine might well coincide for all you know; that is irrelevant.  What matters is that your view on copyright doesn't determine the law.  I disagree with a great many laws, but if I don't obey them I get in trouble.

You are in blatent violation of copyright.

Not to mention it being ethically suspect to have taken the work of another and put it up for sale.

It is your duty to track them down and get permission before you use the picture, not their duty to spend all day every day looking for potential copyright violators.

[Nefario]

There are a great many laws, of which, at any time of the day you are guilty of breaking(whether you know it or not). Those are bad laws. Ignore them if you can get away with it and they will soon fail to become law (for is it really a law if noone is obeying or enforcing it).

Laws are simply "rules", something some people have gotten together and decided you're not allowed to do. It doesn't mean there is anything wrong with them. Why should you follow them unless someone is at a loss as a result of your actions?

Bad laws by bad people should be ignored and not followed.

Evil laws by evil people should also be fought against.

[Alex Beckenham]

However, it matters not one jot what your views are on copyright.  
...
What matters is that your view on copyright doesn't determine the law.

Oh I see... people's views don't matter, only laws matter?

Wow, I better stop downloading pirated movies then.

Thanks for the tip.