Police Raid Home of Alleged "Bitcoin Creator" Craig Wright - ALL FACTS

[shamati]

                            

there he is!




@Scream

Thx!

Gavin Bitcoin  lookk like Robert DeNiro  in Heat

[chek2fire]

UPDATE: Friday, Dec. 11, 4:24 p.m.: Charles Sturt University denies some of Craig Wright's claims regarding his education at the university, including that he completed a thesis.

[Karartma1]

Let's put things into sequence: Wright is not Satoshi but there's an article which claims that he can probably be him. Then this guy get raided by the australian police. If there was no article we would have never heard of him. My question is why and what this really have to do with bitcoin?

CEO Craig Steven Wright said Denariuz Bank would begin accepting deposits in the second half of 2014 and would eventually offer Bitcoin-based equivalents of conventional savings accounts, term deposits, credit and debit cards, and loans.

Wright said Denariuz would launch with a global pool of more than 100,000 Bitcoin ($A73.6 million) from its backers.

Eventually, the bank hopes to have a million customers globally.

http://www.businessinsider.com.au/aussie-technologists-are-opening-the-worlds-first-bitcoin-based-bank-this-year-2014-2




Wow.

Via search for 'Denariuz' on this forum.

Ok. Touché, I should have spoken for myself only. I heard of him only when the article came out. Thanks 

[LiteCoinGuy]

                            

there he is!




@Scream

Thx!

Gavin Bitcoin  lookk like Robert DeNiro  in Heat

Robert DeNiro = Satoshi? Gizmodo, that is your job! 

[Gleb Gamow]

^^^ Can George Takei play Darian [Satoshi]?

[Searing]

^^^ Can George Takei play Darian [Satoshi]?

Probably IS Satoshi! (would that not be epic!)

[Blawpaw]

let's face it. We will never know who Satoshi really is! He is a smart guy and he knows that they will put him out once that happens...

[lolgato]

There going to be a bunch of fake satoshis popping up the more popular bitcoin get.

[TPTB_need_war]

   He's discussion at the All Star Panel, was very odd, and not in any way lucid or clear. Here is /u/nullc take on a transcript I made. https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3w027x/dr_craig_steven_wright_alleged_satoshi_by_wired/cxsfy8p

    user /u/jarederaj points out a book Wright wrote full of grammatical errors, nothing related to cryptocurrency, digital cash https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3vzgnd/bitcoins_creator_satoshi_nakamoto_is_probably/cxsfeon

jarederaj, nullc (Gregory Maxwell), and Szabo fail to understand Turing-completeness. Craig Wright apparently does.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1282144.msg13239629#msg13239629

Before you downvote, make sure you read my entire thread about Determinism and unbounded entropy. Because you are wrong. Period.

Preventing Turing-completeness is damn hard to accomplish. Idiots think they have.

Craig Wright may or may not be a fraud. I do not have an opinion on that aspect. I am just referring to the allegation about who is correct about Turing-completeness.

Edit: Although I think my explanation on my thread is more insightful on why, I found this which explains that it is very difficult to not have Turing-completeness:

http://www.gwern.net/Turing-complete

[TPTB_need_war]

and was already proven that he is a impostor by maxwell

You do not comprehend what the word proof means, at least not in a mathematical sense.

Circumstantial evidence is not an irrefutable proof. Period. And I will soon offer a theory positing a possible refutation to Maxwell and Theymos's circumstantial evidence.

Even going one step below the veracity of a proof, we have for example in a USA criminal court (don't know about all jurisdictions) that circumstantial evidence is not always evidence-beyond-a-reasonable-doubt. In civil court (less stringent since a challenge to personal liberty via incarceration is not at-stake) the test for victory (veracity) is afaik preponderance of the evidence.

We haven't even completed the discovery phase of evidence yet...

[spartacusrex]

LOL

I was just thinking how 'ironic' it would be if Craig was actually Satoshi, and he could see what everyone thinks..

I'm not saying he is or isn't Satoshi.

I can see a series of events take place that would lead to this situation with him in either scenario.

And also, I see no correlation between computer / crypto / genius coder types and some moral/ethical higher code. And certainly not any ability to run a company.. Quite the opposite in fact..

Maybe Satoshi is a bad ass. Raising Hell in his wake.

( Hell in a good way )

..

That would be cool.

[calkob]

basically the the Mafia has shown up looking there share, pay up our your going to jail.   

[Amph]

and was already proven that he is a impostor by maxwell

You do not comprehend what the word proof means, at least not in a mathematical sense.

Circumstantial evidence is not an irrefutable proof. Period. And I will soon offer a theory positing a possible refutation to Maxwell and Theymos's circumstantial evidence.

Even going one step below the veracity of a proof, we have for example in a USA criminal court (don't know about all jurisdictions) that circumstantial evidence is not always evidence-beyond-a-reasonable-doubt. In civil court (less stringent since a challenge to personal liberty via incarceration is not at-stake) the test for victory (veracity) is afaik preponderance of the evidence.

We haven't even completed the discovery phase of evidence yet...

at this point nothing can be a guarantee that is his satoshi, not even signing, no one know if the wallet of satoshi still belong to him

so why i should trust this guy or anyone else, we can simply accept that satoshi will not be discovered ever and move on, it would not matter at this point

besides all this, he does not look like someone who could have write all those technical posts here, not even near it