Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it

[anyone_future_again]

[/quote]
I tried to duplicate your claim and could not. The only opportunity I know of to implement a double sha256 without completely violating parameters would be on the pubkey before  ripem160 yea?
[/quote]
After you make first SHA256 you apply the RIPEMD160 and you will find the BTC address without the last 4 bits.

After i was studying the problem, i see that everybody want to have his own pool and work alone, instead of working in group and share...

If anyone have his work and database, this means everyone will scan almost the same ranges and this is not ok...all that hard work to be lost for nothing...

So i am thinking to create a public database where everyone who contribute with good information to have access and  free and will be a rule like this: add at least 10 ranges of B9 of 5 ranges of B9j(with script that will verify behind if really are real) and after that the registration will be done!

It's a good ideea?

[kTimesG]

It's a good ideea?

No, your database would have zero reliability and zero trust. You'd also not be the first to do this, and neither the first to quickly get roasted pretty hard around here that your database is neither reliable or trustworthy.

[danielcec2]

The key lies within 93 to 97% of the total range.

[anyone_future_again]

It's a good ideea?

No, your database would have zero reliability and zero trust. You'd also not be the first to do this, and neither the first to quickly get roasted pretty hard around here that your database is neither reliable or trustworthy.

I see the point. Yes, you are right about this.

Regarding the the bitcrack and vanitysearch there is a big problem using it. Normal users are seeing a speed and they are happy that the numbers are big, but the real problem is the process behind.
The authors was cutting from the process and increasing the speed, but forgot about this:
Endomorphism — What It Is and Why It Matters
The secp256k1 curve (Bitcoin) has a special mathematical property. If you compute one EC point k·G = (x, y), you get 5 more valid keypairs for almost free:
Check
Operation
Cost
k
Direct point
Full EC step
λk
(β·x mod p, y)
1 field multiply
λ²k
(β²·x mod p, y)
1 field multiply
-k
(x, -y mod p)
1 negation (free)
-λk
negate above
free
-λ²k
negate above
free
Cost ratio: 1 expensive EC step → 6 address checks. The extra 5 come from two cheap multiplications + negations.

Until puzzle 135 is ok to use it, but on the real BTC addresses is useless without Endomorphism. On my software version i added this option so when you search, you have all 6 addresses checked besided the versions from Github that check only 1.

[0xastraeus]

Dear god buddy lay off the AI. what are you on about. Endomorphism is not useful here, it'll search outside the range. All that mumbo jumbo you spewed out has nothing to do with what kTimesG said.

It's a good ideea?

No, your database would have zero reliability and zero trust. You'd also not be the first to do this, and neither the first to quickly get roasted pretty hard around here that your database is neither reliable or trustworthy.

I see the point. Yes, you are right about this.

Regarding the the bitcrack and vanitysearch there is a big problem using it. Normal users are seeing a speed and they are happy that the numbers are big, but the real problem is the process behind.
The authors was cutting from the process and increasing the speed, but forgot about this:
Endomorphism — What It Is and Why It Matters
The secp256k1 curve (Bitcoin) has a special mathematical property. If you compute one EC point k·G = (x, y), you get 5 more valid keypairs for almost free:
Check
Operation
Cost
k
Direct point
Full EC step
λk
(β·x mod p, y)
1 field multiply
λ²k
(β²·x mod p, y)
1 field multiply
-k
(x, -y mod p)
1 negation (free)
-λk
negate above
free
-λ²k
negate above
free
Cost ratio: 1 expensive EC step → 6 address checks. The extra 5 come from two cheap multiplications + negations.

Until puzzle 135 is ok to use it, but on the real BTC addresses is useless without Endomorphism. On my software version i added this option so when you search, you have all 6 addresses checked besided the versions from Github that check only 1.

[Anyone_future_next]

As i see here there are only haters....no one cand try to think or develop something, or try to investigate because of this guys...
Why everyone thinks AI is the god and  solving the problems?
If we were using tge AI we were filling tge github with nonsense or youtube or any other platform to make views and publicity...
As we see is that if we make the database public, including the one from btcpuzzle, nobody will use a Solo pool again and this guys will loose money, or worst somebody will find before you the key.
INFO for everyone:
Even if you use MARA you cannot take the money because they broadcast in their network first and is writing in Terms&Conditions that they do not guarantee this.
So i know someone from their side that is waiting for someone to use the transaction there.
All the work that you do for this puzzles is a waste of time, unless you have your own bitcoin mining pool to mine your transaction.
So have fun!

[kTimesG]

As i see here there are only haters....no one cand try to think or develop something, or try to investigate because of this guys...
Why everyone thinks AI is the god and  solving the problems?

Well you seem to, since you brought it up, it served you some non-sense that you posted here, and basically called software developers for this puzzle idiots for not using endomorphism to speed things up, for the last 11 years. Stupid them, right?

[zLuoManhwas]

Attacking these ranges without massive resources is futile; we must find an isogeny to a vulnerable curve, map the problem to an extension field F_p^k using the MOV attack to apply Index Calculus, and finally lift the solution back to the original group by reversing the isogeny.

Does anyone have an interesting idea? Please don't reply with AI 🙃
If my text looks strange, I apologize in advance, my English is not very good and I am using a translator.

[GonzAlex]

After you make first SHA256 you apply the RIPEMD160 and you will find the BTC address without the last 4 bits.

After i was studying the problem, i see that everybody want to have his own pool and work alone, instead of working in group and share...

If anyone have his work and database, this means everyone will scan almost the same ranges and this is not ok...all that hard work to be lost for nothing...

So i am thinking to create a public database where everyone who contribute with good information to have access and  free and will be a rule like this: add at least 10 ranges of B9 of 5 ranges of B9j(with script that will verify behind if really are real) and after that the registration will be done!

It's a good ideea?

Create a Google Sheets app and grant edit access to specific people.
On one page, they'll paste the range they checked, and on another page, the found prefixes, for example.
What's the point of wasting time creating a separate platform with moderation, etc.?
And no confirmation is required.
In private messages, if someone sends 10 or so prefixes that haven't been mentioned on the forum yet, grant them access.

[optioncmdPR]

As i see here there are only haters....no one cand try to think or develop something, or try to investigate because of this guys...
Why everyone thinks AI is the god and  solving the problems?
If we were using tge AI we were filling tge github with nonsense or youtube or any other platform to make views and publicity...
As we see is that if we make the database public, including the one from btcpuzzle, nobody will use a Solo pool again and this guys will loose money, or worst somebody will find before you the key.
INFO for everyone:
Even if you use MARA you cannot take the money because they broadcast in their network first and is writing in Terms&Conditions that they do not guarantee this.
So i know someone from their side that is waiting for someone to use the transaction there.
All the work that you do for this puzzles is a waste of time, unless you have your own bitcoin mining pool to mine your transaction.
So have fun!

Wait, so....using the lightening network doesnt  bypass this problem? 

[vhh]

Attacking these ranges without massive resources is futile; we must find an isogeny to a vulnerable curve, map the problem to an extension field F_p^k using the MOV attack to apply Index Calculus, and finally lift the solution back to the original group by reversing the isogeny.

Does anyone have an interesting idea? Please don't reply with AI 🙃
If my text looks strange, I apologize in advance, my English is not very good and I am using a translator.

MOV attack doesn't apply on secp256k1 because the embedding degree is huge !

[Jorge54PT]

As i see here there are only haters....no one cand try to think or develop something, or try to investigate because of this guys...
Why everyone thinks AI is the god and  solving the problems?
If we were using tge AI we were filling tge github with nonsense or youtube or any other platform to make views and publicity...
As we see is that if we make the database public, including the one from btcpuzzle, nobody will use a Solo pool again and this guys will loose money, or worst somebody will find before you the key.
INFO for everyone:
Even if you use MARA you cannot take the money because they broadcast in their network first and is writing in Terms&Conditions that they do not guarantee this.
So i know someone from their side that is waiting for someone to use the transaction there.
All the work that you do for this puzzles is a waste of time, unless you have your own bitcoin mining pool to mine your transaction.
So have fun!

Thank you for the information. Based on what you said, I will forward your statement to the regulator investigating Mara Pool's operations. All users deserve truthfulness and clarity in the transactions and mining operations of registered pools. Mara will be no exception. Thank you.


Operations to be verified:
Ps: MARA / Faq / Line 9  :  Are my transactions private?

Before they are mined, yes. Your transactions are not broadcast to the Bitcoin network until they have received at least one confirmation. Once mined, your transaction will live on the public Bitcoin ledger.

...sent

[ldabasim]

Yes the FAQ says they're private. There was one user a while back claiming he has access to mara and I think he's the one this poster means. But he was kinda crazy and was obviously ragebaiting. Mara should work fine.

[Jorge54PT]

Yes the FAQ says they're private. There was one user a while back claiming he has access to mara and I think he's the one this poster means. But he was kinda crazy and was obviously ragebaiting. Mara should work fine.

I agree with you. Besides, Mara is a well-established and reputable pool that moves millions of dollars a day. However, I've already filed the report so there are no surprises

[zLuoManhwas]

MOV attack doesn't apply on secp256k1 because the embedding degree is huge !

That's obvious, brother, but what I mean is to look for an isogeny with a smaller degree of embedding using a more efficient search method.

If you don't understand what isogeny is, avoid wasting your time answering.

[anyone_future_again]

Yes the FAQ says they're private. There was one user a while back claiming he has access to mara and I think he's the one this poster means. But he was kinda crazy and was obviously ragebaiting. Mara should work fine.

I agree with you. Besides, Mara is a well-established and reputable pool that moves millions of dollars a day. However, I've already filed the report so there are no surprises

I think you do not understand what means MARA network. Instead of beeing public, is a private node where only paid workers are allowed. When the TX is broadcast on their node, everybody from that nod receive it, so nobody know if they extract the public key from TX or not. Read more carefully the terms and conditions.
There is not only Mara devices to mine...they have the BRAND and name, but there are subsidiars...
The only safe method is to mine yourself the transaction and then you have 100% guarantee that is yours.
***And yes, Mara is providing anonimity on 256 hash, not on 71-135...this is the reality, you can accept it or believe smoke and mirrors...

What you can do instead is to learn from each puzzle and find the "magical" formula to decrypt any wallet

So have fun everyone!

[analyticnomad]

Yes the FAQ says they're private. There was one user a while back claiming he has access to mara and I think he's the one this poster means. But he was kinda crazy and was obviously ragebaiting. Mara should work fine.

I agree with you. Besides, Mara is a well-established and reputable pool that moves millions of dollars a day. However, I've already filed the report so there are no surprises

I think you do not understand what means MARA network. Instead of beeing public, is a private node where only paid workers are allowed. When the TX is broadcast on their node, everybody from that nod receive it, so nobody know if they extract the public key from TX or not. Read more carefully the terms and conditions.
There is not only Mara devices to mine...they have the BRAND and name, but there are subsidiars...
The only safe method is to mine yourself the transaction and then you have 100% guarantee that is yours.
***And yes, Mara is providing anonimity on 256 hash, not on 71-135...this is the reality, you can accept it or believe smoke and mirrors...

What you can do instead is to learn from each puzzle and find the "magical" formula to decrypt any wallet

So have fun everyone!

It's already been concluded that MARA is fine. 68 and 69 were successfully mined using it.

edit: 67 and 68 were mined using MARA. 69 was stollen.

[jonematt]

good or not ? 

GPU          : GPU #0 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 (170x0 cores) Grid(1360x128)

[00:00:38] [CPU+GPU: 7248.96 Mk/s] [GPU: 7248.96 Mk/s] [C: 0.001254 %] [R: 0] [T: 282,360,545,280 (39 bit)] [F: 0]