Bitcoin Forum
November 10, 2024, 02:42:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: crossing network  (Read 797 times)
CliffordM (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 95
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 14, 2012, 08:12:45 PM
 #1

Has anyone thought of offering an anonymous crossing network, for say USD/BTC ?

It could be done once a week, and would facilitate people trying to trade large size without
spooking the real-time exchange.  Only the crossing price and size traded would be announced
leaving other participants hidden.

They are very popular in established markets, and provide significant liquidity without
boosting volatility.
MPOE-PR
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 522



View Profile
December 14, 2012, 10:09:38 PM
 #2

Has anyone thought of offering an anonymous crossing network, for say USD/BTC ?

It could be done once a week, and would facilitate people trying to trade large size without
spooking the real-time exchange.  Only the crossing price and size traded would be announced
leaving other participants hidden.

They are very popular in established markets, and provide significant liquidity without
boosting volatility.

There's maybe five people in BTC who'd have the credibility to start one. So no, it wouldn't be done in a week. It'd be done as soon as one of them sees it as worthwhile. (Which won't happen because OTC already exists and already does this, and on this note see here.)

My Credentials  | THE BTC Stock Exchange | I have my very own anthology! | Use bitcointa.lk, it's like this one but better.
Dalkore
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1026


Mining since 2010 & Hosting since 2012


View Profile WWW
December 14, 2012, 10:35:55 PM
 #3

Has anyone thought of offering an anonymous crossing network, for say USD/BTC ?

It could be done once a week, and would facilitate people trying to trade large size without
spooking the real-time exchange.  Only the crossing price and size traded would be announced
leaving other participants hidden.

They are very popular in established markets, and provide significant liquidity without
boosting volatility.

I believe they call these "Dark Pools".  Depending on the position I would take, it could be beneficial to me but having the exchange reflect an accurate current price may be more beneficial to everyone involved?

Thoughts?

Hosting: Low as $60.00 per KW - Link
Transaction List: jayson3 +5 - ColdHardMetal +3 - Nolo +2 - CoinHoarder +1 - Elxiliath +1 - tymm0 +1 - Johnniewalker +1 - Oscer +1 - Davidj411 +1 - BitCoiner2012 +1 - dstruct2k +1 - Philj +1 - camolist +1 - exahash +1 - Littleshop +1 - Severian +1 - DebitMe +1 - lepenguin +1 - StringTheory +1 - amagimetals +1 - jcoin200 +1 - serp +1 - klintay +1 - -droid- +1 - FlutterPie +1
CliffordM (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 95
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 15, 2012, 01:30:41 PM
 #4

A crossing-network is quite different from an OTC arrangement, and both adds liquidity and decreases volatility to an existing exchange mechanism.

Gold and Silver have daily fixings (which are essentially daily crosses) and many of the larger players prefer to trade either in the cross or at
the fixing price, which is regarded as a better indicator of value than an exchange print.

Regarding market transparency, the crossing price and volume are printed, but the underlying orders of which there can be many remain hidden -- this
being an important aspect of the mechanism as it encourages more potential liquidity.

The most obvious candidate to run a cross would be MtGox as they have the ability to hold USD and BTC against orders.

Quite typically a large amount of the MtGox book would be swept away into the cross , and then back onto the MtGox book afterwards.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!