allinvain (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 01:02:58 AM |
|
$620 + shipping and it is a deal.
I have the units are all boxed up already, I would prefer not to open them up again. The lowest I saw was 3TH, but most did more. I put a lot more packing materials in than KNC did, so they will stay put inside the box. They should make it there safely. Then take a USD refund. Not sure why there is a double standard here. I am taking DebitMe's advice and get them all up and running. I am not wasting my time with you. You already wasted enough of my time. There is no double standard man. You are just trying to swing the deal in your favor so you come out the winner on top no matter what. That is the problem here. You get a USD refund and I get a USD refund and the remaining btc is still mine. It's the same in the end man. Well duh, of course you would get them up and running right away. I do not care what you do with them from this point on. Accept the 5.10 btc compensation and get lost please you have already stressed me enough with your greedy selfish self-entitled nonsense. You just can't take any business loss can you. You must always be on top, right?
|
|
|
|
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4830
Merit: 4535
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 01:06:50 AM |
|
Here is my opinion on the matter...
If the units were advertised correctly and the buyer had some issue with setting them up to run them to their full potential, then it is not the sellers fault and he should receive the units back, plus compensation for shipping, plus a reasonable estimate of what the units would have made in the amount of time they were not running at his location (as the buyer wasted the sellers time).
If the units were advertised incorrectly and the buyer is correct, then the buyer should receive their full payment back and be reimbursed for shipping. (If the coins are held in escrow much longer I would include a reasonable amount of interest as well).
That is my 2 cents, depending on how the situation really happened.
Thank you for weighing in.
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
DebitMe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2800
Merit: 1012
Get Paid Crypto To Walk or Drive
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 01:07:41 AM |
|
Here is my opinion on the matter...
If the units were advertised correctly and the buyer had some issue with setting them up to run them to their full potential, then it is not the sellers fault and he should receive the units back, plus compensation for shipping, plus a reasonable estimate of what the units would have made in the amount of time they were not running at his location (as the buyer wasted the sellers time).
If the units were advertised incorrectly and the buyer is correct, then the buyer should receive their full payment back and be reimbursed for shipping. (If the coins are held in escrow much longer I would include a reasonable amount of interest as well).
That is my 2 cents, depending on how the situation really happened.
Thank you for weighing in. So I guess first it comes to, what was really advertised and what was really delivered? Do we know that yet?
|
|
|
|
scyth3
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 01:08:50 AM |
|
$620 + shipping and it is a deal.
I have the units are all boxed up already, I would prefer not to open them up again. The lowest I saw was 3TH, but most did more. I put a lot more packing materials in than KNC did, so they will stay put inside the box. They should make it there safely. Then take a USD refund. Not sure why there is a double standard here. I am taking DebitMe's advice and get them all up and running. I am not wasting my time with you. You already wasted enough of my time. There is no double standard man. You are just trying to swing the deal in your favor so you come out the winner on top no matter what. That is the problem here. You get a USD refund and I get a USD refund and the remaining btc is still mine. It's the same in the end man. Well duh, of course you would get them up and running right away. I do not care what you do with them from this point on. Accept the 5.10 btc compensation and get lost please you have already stressed me enough with your greedy selfish self-entitled nonsense. You just can't take any business loss can you. You must always be on top, right? I won't take responsibility for your mistakes. That is the bottom line. You got to grow a pair and be responsible for your actions. It is the principle for me at this point. I won't let up at any point, not until I get every penny of damages you caused.
|
|
|
|
scyth3
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 01:10:31 AM |
|
Here is my opinion on the matter...
If the units were advertised correctly and the buyer had some issue with setting them up to run them to their full potential, then it is not the sellers fault and he should receive the units back, plus compensation for shipping, plus a reasonable estimate of what the units would have made in the amount of time they were not running at his location (as the buyer wasted the sellers time).
If the units were advertised incorrectly and the buyer is correct, then the buyer should receive their full payment back and be reimbursed for shipping. (If the coins are held in escrow much longer I would include a reasonable amount of interest as well).
That is my 2 cents, depending on how the situation really happened.
Thank you for weighing in. So I guess first it comes to, what was really advertised and what was really delivered? Do we know that yet? I am working on it. This was so unexpected that I had to cancel my Christmas plans to come back to test these things. I am short a few power supplies because Finksy boards came defective. They are on the way back to him now.
|
|
|
|
allinvain (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 01:10:57 AM |
|
Here is my opinion on the matter...
If the units were advertised correctly and the buyer had some issue with setting them up to run them to their full potential, then it is not the sellers fault and he should receive the units back, plus compensation for shipping, plus a reasonable estimate of what the units would have made in the amount of time they were not running at his location (as the buyer wasted the sellers time).
If the units were advertised incorrectly and the buyer is correct, then the buyer should receive their full payment back and be reimbursed for shipping. (If the coins are held in escrow much longer I would include a reasonable amount of interest as well).
That is my 2 cents, depending on how the situation really happened.
Thank you for weighing in. So I guess first it comes to, what was really advertised and what was really delivered? Do we know that yet? What was advertised was 3.0 TH stable miners. What was delivered is unstable miners that hashed nowwhere near that - when they were hashing. Seller blames our PSUs. Our PSUs have no problems powering Batch 1 Neptunes, SP20s, S5s, just his miners for some reason are special. Maybe just maybe somehow our PSUs don't have the magic juice to make them work. That's why I approached to send the gear back to the seller and not waste our time and his while we wait and find other PSUs (which takes time and at the time we had other priorities). Seller agreed to this, and I though there would be no hurt feelings. We both tried to get them up and running reliably and failed. We tried all tricks we could think of. Nothing worked.
|
|
|
|
allinvain (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 01:14:51 AM |
|
$620 + shipping and it is a deal.
I have the units are all boxed up already, I would prefer not to open them up again. The lowest I saw was 3TH, but most did more. I put a lot more packing materials in than KNC did, so they will stay put inside the box. They should make it there safely. Then take a USD refund. Not sure why there is a double standard here. I am taking DebitMe's advice and get them all up and running. I am not wasting my time with you. You already wasted enough of my time. There is no double standard man. You are just trying to swing the deal in your favor so you come out the winner on top no matter what. That is the problem here. You get a USD refund and I get a USD refund and the remaining btc is still mine. It's the same in the end man. Well duh, of course you would get them up and running right away. I do not care what you do with them from this point on. Accept the 5.10 btc compensation and get lost please you have already stressed me enough with your greedy selfish self-entitled nonsense. You just can't take any business loss can you. You must always be on top, right? I won't take responsibility for your mistakes. That is the bottom line. You got to grow a pair and be responsible for your actions. It is the principle for me at this point. I won't let up at any point, not until I get every penny of damages you caused. I will not let you rob me blindly. That is what you are doing. Your compensation is unreasonable. I offered to pay for everything now including the difference in price between current market value and purchase price and yet you refuse. Every time you come up with a bigger compensation number which is obvious evidence that you are just using your position of power to squeeze as much money out of me as possible. You operate like the mafia.
|
|
|
|
allinvain (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 01:17:02 AM |
|
Here is my opinion on the matter...
If the units were advertised correctly and the buyer had some issue with setting them up to run them to their full potential, then it is not the sellers fault and he should receive the units back, plus compensation for shipping, plus a reasonable estimate of what the units would have made in the amount of time they were not running at his location (as the buyer wasted the sellers time).
If the units were advertised incorrectly and the buyer is correct, then the buyer should receive their full payment back and be reimbursed for shipping. (If the coins are held in escrow much longer I would include a reasonable amount of interest as well).
That is my 2 cents, depending on how the situation really happened.
Thank you for weighing in. So I guess first it comes to, what was really advertised and what was really delivered? Do we know that yet? I am working on it. This was so unexpected that I had to cancel my Christmas plans to come back to test these things. I am short a few power supplies because Finksy boards came defective. They are on the way back to him now. Please do not use emotional appeals. I have PM proof where you tell me precisely when you'll be back to test them. I doubt you missed your Christmas plans to test them.
|
|
|
|
allinvain (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 01:23:34 AM |
|
Based on $620 purchase price (see my quote of your PM) I will adjust my compensation offer higher to $2445 to account for the $20 per miner difference. $2445 is 5.48 btc at today's rate.
|
|
|
|
allinvain (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 01:25:40 AM |
|
Here is my opinion on the matter...
If the units were advertised correctly and the buyer had some issue with setting them up to run them to their full potential, then it is not the sellers fault and he should receive the units back, plus compensation for shipping, plus a reasonable estimate of what the units would have made in the amount of time they were not running at his location (as the buyer wasted the sellers time).
If the units were advertised incorrectly and the buyer is correct, then the buyer should receive their full payment back and be reimbursed for shipping. (If the coins are held in escrow much longer I would include a reasonable amount of interest as well).
That is my 2 cents, depending on how the situation really happened.
Thank you for weighing in. So I guess first it comes to, what was really advertised and what was really delivered? Do we know that yet? What I cannot believe is how nobody is noticing how the seller is trying to get the full value of his miners (at market price) AND still keep the miners AND still hash with them! So basically he is asking for free money and nobody noticed this yet. Astounding.
|
|
|
|
scyth3
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 01:27:01 AM |
|
Here is my opinion on the matter...
If the units were advertised correctly and the buyer had some issue with setting them up to run them to their full potential, then it is not the sellers fault and he should receive the units back, plus compensation for shipping, plus a reasonable estimate of what the units would have made in the amount of time they were not running at his location (as the buyer wasted the sellers time).
If the units were advertised incorrectly and the buyer is correct, then the buyer should receive their full payment back and be reimbursed for shipping. (If the coins are held in escrow much longer I would include a reasonable amount of interest as well).
That is my 2 cents, depending on how the situation really happened.
Thank you for weighing in. So I guess first it comes to, what was really advertised and what was really delivered? Do we know that yet? What I cannot believe is how nobody is noticing how the seller is trying to get the full value of his miners (at market price) AND still keep the miners AND still hash with them! So basically he is asking for free money and nobody noticed this yet. Astounding. Because that is only true in your world buddy.
|
|
|
|
allinvain (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 12, 2016, 01:30:43 AM |
|
Here is my opinion on the matter...
If the units were advertised correctly and the buyer had some issue with setting them up to run them to their full potential, then it is not the sellers fault and he should receive the units back, plus compensation for shipping, plus a reasonable estimate of what the units would have made in the amount of time they were not running at his location (as the buyer wasted the sellers time).
If the units were advertised incorrectly and the buyer is correct, then the buyer should receive their full payment back and be reimbursed for shipping. (If the coins are held in escrow much longer I would include a reasonable amount of interest as well).
That is my 2 cents, depending on how the situation really happened.
Thank you for weighing in. So I guess first it comes to, what was really advertised and what was really delivered? Do we know that yet? What I cannot believe is how nobody is noticing how the seller is trying to get the full value of his miners (at market price) AND still keep the miners AND still hash with them! So basically he is asking for free money and nobody noticed this yet. Astounding. Because that is only true in your world buddy. Maybe you suck at communication. How about you put a bit more effort into it and try to make yourself clearly understood. Do I have to second guess your words? "My compensation = 12.14BTC" You mean this amount comes back to me or YOU? When people use the word "my" they typically mean themselves. So please do explain what you mean. I understood it to mean that YOU want 12.14 BTC to YOU..YOURSELF. If by this somehow you mean that is the refund I get than I'd be fine with that!
|
|
|
|
allinvain (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1080
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 13, 2016, 07:39:57 AM |
|
I'll leave this for posterity's sake. We have both come to an agreement:
syth3 receives 7.7338 BTC as compensation.
allinvain receives a 10 BTC refund.
|
|
|
|
|