Bitcoin was adopted because lot of people believed transactions are not
traceable, so first motive was anon trading em l wrong?
So future belongs to those who deliver best anonymous transactions and if possible decentralized markets..
You think BTC got big because it was perceived to be Anon ?
I think it got big because it was / is a new concept with a lot of perks -combined-
One of them may* have been the "perception" it was a "anon".
But i find it hard to believe that was a major driving force.
I was around and watched it unfold from worthless to over a grand so i know.
untraceable transactions seemed to have no bearing on any of it.
The majority couldn't care less about ANON bullshit and many like myself think..
it's highly detrimental for adoption.What i
did see is many cases where a guy got robbed in Crypto over the years with Bitcoin
and they wanted to track down the thief.. and thanks to traceability a lot of users got their money back.
What i didn't see was guys running around wearing hoodies that say "Bitcoin=Untraceable" on them like Monero idiots DO !
Anon was called out LONG ago in the Alt scene for what it is..
a stupid GIMMICK !Most of us had said this long and hard for years now.. nothing has changed.
Aside from some users leaving and new idiots showing up..
thinking they can replay the anon gimmick game.So nub's ..been there and done that and got the hoodie There you have it my opinion.. the correct one.. what more do you all want ?