[ABCbits]

 

[yugo23]

It's obviously skilled games as they're the only one where you can (or at least might) have a chance to win.

On luck games you MUST lose, whatever who you are you will lose at a moment or another.

But I don't know a lot of skilled base games... Poker but what else?

[LFC_Bitcoin]

A good poker player will, I guess, make more money per year than a person who plays games of luck.

On average obviously, the guy playing games of luck could scoop a jackpot

[panjul07]

As subject said, Which one is more profitable? Skill-based games or Lucky-based games?
Some say Skill-based games is more profitable when you're know how to pay, while some say Lucky-based games is easy to play & easier to win.

What do you think? I think both of them are unprofitable.

Depends on your own luck, because there is no game which is 100% skill-based. They only skill-based game I know is just poker, with this game I could earn more satoshi. So I can say that skill-based game is more profitable especially if we have better skills than our opponents.

[amrulshare]

I think if only we are in need of luck alone will not win constantly, I think it is crucial skill we play. when to stop and when to go 

[onlinedragon]

A good poker player will, I guess, make more money per year than a person who plays games of luck.

On average obviously, the guy playing games of luck could scoop a jackpot

Poker is for the most people also luck or you will have to play 30 tables at the same time. Not something all people can who know how to play good poker. The running time of a tournament is long and most of time only final table pays good.

[SFR10]

Skilled based are always much more profitable since you develope certain skills the longer you learn how every thing works and makes it easier to earn profit in the long run. On the other hand lucky based is purely on luck therefor more chances of losing in the long run.

[znickelbackz]

don't know, don't care. gamble is not profitable anyway. just care about the fun, which brings more fun. oh and, i think gamble should be devided to 2 types: skill-based and not skill-based.

[adibe]

Both are good. But i choose gamble on sportsbook. and sportsbook is skill-based games or lucky-based games ? because i think sportsbook is really gambling and not about that type. CMIIW.

[safi71]

As subject said, Which one is more profitable? Skill-based games or Lucky-based games?
Some say Skill-based games is more profitable when you're know how to pay, while some say Lucky-based games is easy to play & easier to win.

What do you think? I think both of them are unprofitable.

I think Skill-based and Lucky-based Both are profitable.It's my opinion,sometimes luck is more profitable for you and some time your skill.

[BAGOBO]

Skill based seems profitable,
For example : if you're experet on sport betting, you will get advantage for guessing the winning team.

Meanwhile luck based game depend on luck and their house edge

[pinoycash]

Luck is more profitable, Because your only enemy is the house edge. while skill base games, required skills to win, and you dont know how skilled your opponent are

[azguard]

Luck is more profitable, Because your only enemy is the house edge. while skill base games, required skills to win, and you dont know how skilled your opponent are

true but in basic you always need luck in both cases so primary everything is luck if you think about it dont you think the same no mater now skill you or your opponent is luck is main factor

[darkangel11]

Skill based games are more profitable. Of course there are always bad players playing and they end up losing, but the more you can influence the game the greater chance of winning.

[sana54210]

It's obviously skilled games as they're the only one where you can (or at least might) have a chance to win.

On luck games you MUST lose, whatever who you are you will lose at a moment or another.

But I don't know a lot of skilled base games... Poker but what else?

But all games of gambling require one to have luck as well. Skill alone can't make a person win. I have a good knowledge in card games but many a times I lose as I am out of luck and when I win I give credit to my luck. Luck doesn't have to be always good as back luck also counts.

[koshgel]

You don't see anything completely skill-based in the gambling world. There is always a luck factor. Although for some games, you have to be luckier than others to be profitable. For the games with lots of luck involved, you wanna try for big wins in the short term. With the skill games like poker you grind to get to profit. So really depends which one you consider to be more profitable.

[davinchi]

Luck based games are more profitable as when a person is lucky, the amount they win is higher but skill based games require you to know and understand the game well else there are high chances of losing.

In my case, I mainly just bet without thinking a lot and if I win, credit goes to my luck.

[Patatas]

The games which are provably fair.Period.
Doesn't matter if the game is skill based or Luck based ,if its giving you fair chances to win,its profitable .You can take an example of a chess game highly skill based,but if the opponent bot is highly advanced to beat humans of course in this case,skill base games won't be really profitable.Same goes to Luck based games.My advice would still be skill based games.

[European Central Bank]

You can't develop luck. You either got it or you don't and I don't. You can work on your skills with the right system so that gets my vote.

[nickaizoku]

Do you mean games like sport?
If it sports i think skilled are really help here.
But if provably fair.. i guess its need luck. But sometimes i think its not luck.. its based on your capital funda