My proposal to reduce signature campaign spamming

[mexxer-2]

Quora's rules seem awesome

So Quoraing instead of Signaturing ?

Just see any thread/post in Quora and tell me if thats not the type of posts you want to see.

Personally Quora's rules seem awesome

I don't know what is that? An how this is going to help?

Its too awesome to speak of in one post, here: https://www.quora.com/What-are-major-policies-and-guidelines-on-Quora

[1715540787]

1715540787

[1715540787]

1715540787

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Much spam comes from 20 posts per day.. or more.. Just quit this practice paying per day and per post.
Best is paying per week or per month.
Number of posts must not be over 5 paid posts per day.

All is on managers and Admins..

That is absolute nonsense and ironic coming from a Yobit campaigner.  You can certainly make 20 constructive posts and more per day if--and this is a big if--you take your time and think about what you're writing.   But a lot of posters obviously don't.   But that doesn't mean it can't be done, it just means some folks are lazy and like to do the absolute minimum ( or less).

[arbitrage]

That is absolute nonsense and ironic coming from a Yobit campaigner.

Many of us are trying to give more than 50 characters in posts..
And English is not my native, and much time i have grammar in my hands..
(As member i can accumulate about 1$ per 20 posts, i wont tell you how much time is needed for this. Is this worth of it?)
But i enjoy talking to others so i can learn more and also contribute to topic.
That's my motives.
Thanks.

[Heutenamos]

I don't know why alway someone must say things like you did ?

Start the mission,let me see where you can take this 

[arbitrage]

I don't think i'm on the mission and i certainly won't be persistent furthermore.
just tried to talk about practical things. Admins will take care for this anyway.

[Druze]

i like that idea and i think that it could work
but what if there was a captcha that you had to answer after every x amount of posts
that could eliminate the automated bots at least

[jonathgb25]

Trust feature is enough and high ranking members will farm that thanks system as if right now, they were farming their trust by using it to send unnecessary and nonsense feedbacks to the members if the post they saw was not fitted to them. I hate that kind of members.

Almost all of the signature campaign right now do not accept members with negative trust.

My suggestion was to have a captcha for posting to lessen the bots and without removing the post duration restriction.

[arbitrage]

i like that idea and i think that it could work
but what if there was a captcha that you had to answer after every x amount of posts
that could eliminate the automated bots at least

This could be very annoying. I don't like this idea.
Yes this could be end for most of bots, but i will "survive" if something like this become mandatory.

[shorena]

i like that idea and i think that it could work
but what if there was a captcha that you had to answer after every x amount of posts
that could eliminate the automated bots at least

This could be very annoying. I don't like this idea.
Yes this could be end for most of bots, but i will "survive" if something like this become mandatory.

The bots only post 1-3 posts until they are nuked, they have to solve a captcha to register a new account. I dont think its a solution.

[Lauda]

I don't think i'm on the mission and i certainly won't be persistent furthermore.
just tried to talk about practical things. Admins will take care for this anyway.

I don't think you understand the situation on the forum well. You should avoid posting in such threads and focus on reading. The fight against signature campaign spammers is going on for a few years.

My suggestion was to have a captcha for posting to lessen the bots and without removing the post duration restriction.

This effectively does nothing. It is quite rare for a bot to go unnoticed for a longer period of time.

The problem is deciding whether to reward for posting, or post for rewards.

You should be rewarded for posting. Once you start posting for the rewards the likelihood of a ban increases significantly.

[Goms]

But that is what the forum moderator does, he deletes posts that are irrelevant and considered as spam. I do not see low quality posts in the ones I've been reading thus far.

[BitcoinBlackjack]

Don't forget that the different membership tiers also encourage spam! People trying to get their postcount up to be able to put better signatures / make more BTC off the signature campaigns

[shorena]

Don't forget that the different membership tiers also encourage spam! People trying to get their postcount up to be able to put better signatures / make more BTC off the signature campaigns

One post a day is hardly spam in itself. Rank do not increase based on the post count, but on activity. Since activity is capped at 14 every 14 days I dont see your point here.

[botany]

Don't forget that the different membership tiers also encourage spam! People trying to get their postcount up to be able to put better signatures / make more BTC off the signature campaigns

If anything, the different membership tiers discourage spam. Higher ranked members make more from signature campaigns. You wouldn't want a hero account (for which you have put in a lot off effort) to get banned. You wouldn't care if a newbie account gets banned.