Bitcoin Forum
December 12, 2024, 01:52:34 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: What's wrong with this picture?  (Read 464 times)
Gleb Gamow (OP)
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145



View Profile
February 10, 2016, 12:30:30 AM
 #1

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&authuser=0&tbm=nws&q=%22butterfly+labs%22&oq=%22Butterfly+Labs%22&gs_l=serp.3...6526.8849.0.9001.2.2.0.0.0.0.191.272.1j1.2.0....0...1c.1.64.serp..0.0.0.2nPtFiw04UI

franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4438
Merit: 4819



View Profile
February 10, 2016, 12:40:50 AM
 #2

the top link is a crawl of a article wrote in 2013
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/bitcoin-developer-receives-first-butterfly-labs-asic-1364858475
it was
Quote
by Vitalik Buterin

............................................................

12:21 AM GMT Daylight Time
April 2nd, 2013

............................................................


the second link is from january 2015
http://coinjournal.net/return-butterfly-labs/

Quote
By Oliver Carding - January 8, 2015

i think google 'dun goofed' and recrawled old websites.. maybe google found the articles had been updated is some minimal way (spelling mistake or update of website code) that tricked google into thinking it was a new article.

to me this is just a failure on googles part

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
Gleb Gamow (OP)
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145



View Profile
February 10, 2016, 12:51:55 AM
 #3

the top link is a crawl of a article wrote in 2013
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/bitcoin-developer-receives-first-butterfly-labs-asic-1364858475
it was
Quote
by Vitalik Buterin

............................................................

12:21 AM GMT Daylight Time
April 2nd, 2013

............................................................


the second link is from january 2015
http://coinjournal.net/return-butterfly-labs/

Quote
By Oliver Carding - January 8, 2015

i think google 'dun goofed' and recrawled old websites.. maybe google found the articles had been updated is some minimal way (spelling mistake or update of website code) that tricked google into thinking it was a new article.

to me this is just a failure on googles part

I'll accept your assessment, albeit I honestly was leaning toward a consorted effort by the entities somehow adjusting their time- slash daystamps for the ranking juice, hence starting this thread to see if I'm correct or in error in my assessment.
commandrix
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 10, 2016, 02:30:00 AM
 #4

Can't see the picture, but is this about the court case involving Butterfly Labs from April 2015?
Gleb Gamow (OP)
In memoriam
VIP
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145



View Profile
February 10, 2016, 07:52:56 AM
Last edit: February 10, 2016, 08:06:40 AM by Gleb Gamow
 #5

Can't see the picture, but is this about the court case involving Butterfly Labs from April 2015?

This thread is about dates and times and not about any one entity that the articles are about.

Either Google is at fault or the system is being gamed. That's the gist of this thread.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!